L’échelle Positive and Negative Affect Schedule abrégée en langue française : développement, validation et comparaison de ses propriétés psychométriques avec les autres versions courtes

IF 1.3 4区心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED

European Review of Applied Psychology-Revue Europeenne De Psychologie Appliquee Pub Date : 2024-02-24 DOI:10.1016/j.erap.2022.100853

F. Boiroux

{"title":"L’échelle Positive and Negative Affect Schedule abrégée en langue française : développement, validation et comparaison de ses propriétés psychométriques avec les autres versions courtes","authors":"F. Boiroux","doi":"10.1016/j.erap.2022.100853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The PANAS scale is the most widely used instrument to measure positive and negative affects.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The abbreviated scale “Brief Positive and Negative Affect Schedule” (B-PANAS; 10 items) is developed in comparison with the short versions PANAS-SF (Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Short-Form; Kercher, 1992) and the International Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Short-Form (I-PANAS-SF; Thompson, 2007).</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Three studies carried out on 1047 adults (sample 1=201 students, sample 2=319 working people, sample 3=527 adults) led to the development of the B-PANAS as well as the comparison of the factor structure, internal consistency and the validity of the three short scales.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The B-PANAS scale demonstrates robust psychometric properties, unlike the other short versions. The bidimensional structure of the B-PANAS scale is replicated in the three studies and is invariant across age and sex. Internal consistency is supported by all reliability indicators. The nomological network is equivalent to that of the PANAS scale in terms of correlations with instruments representing indicators of cognitive evaluation such as the Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale (Rosenberg, 1965), the Life Orientation Test-Revised (Scheier et al., 1994) and the Satisfaction With Life Scale (Diener et al., 1985).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This research provides a valid scale intended to briefly measure Positive Affects and Negative Affects in French.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46883,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Applied Psychology-Revue Europeenne De Psychologie Appliquee","volume":"74 3","pages":"Article 100853"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Review of Applied Psychology-Revue Europeenne De Psychologie Appliquee","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1162908822001049","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The PANAS scale is the most widely used instrument to measure positive and negative affects.

Objective

The abbreviated scale “Brief Positive and Negative Affect Schedule” (B-PANAS; 10 items) is developed in comparison with the short versions PANAS-SF (Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Short-Form; Kercher, 1992) and the International Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Short-Form (I-PANAS-SF; Thompson, 2007).

Method

Three studies carried out on 1047 adults (sample 1 = 201 students, sample 2 = 319 working people, sample 3 = 527 adults) led to the development of the B-PANAS as well as the comparison of the factor structure, internal consistency and the validity of the three short scales.

Results

The B-PANAS scale demonstrates robust psychometric properties, unlike the other short versions. The bidimensional structure of the B-PANAS scale is replicated in the three studies and is invariant across age and sex. Internal consistency is supported by all reliability indicators. The nomological network is equivalent to that of the PANAS scale in terms of correlations with instruments representing indicators of cognitive evaluation such as the Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale (Rosenberg, 1965), the Life Orientation Test-Revised (Scheier et al., 1994) and the Satisfaction With Life Scale (Diener et al., 1985).

Conclusion

This research provides a valid scale intended to briefly measure Positive Affects and Negative Affects in French.

查看原文本刊更多论文

法文缩写的积极和消极情绪表：开发、验证及其与其他简易版心理测量特性的比较

目的通过与简易版 PANAS-SF（Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Short-Form；Kercher，1992 年）和国际简易版 PANAS-SF （International Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Short-Form；I-PANAS-SF；Thompson，2007 年）进行比较，编制了简易量表 "简易积极和消极情绪表"（Brief Positive and Negative Affect Schedule，B-PANAS；10 个项目）。方法通过对 1047 名成年人（样本 1 = 201 名学生，样本 2 = 319 名上班族，样本 3 = 527 名成年人）进行的三项研究，开发了 B-PANAS 量表，并对三个短量表的因子结构、内部一致性和有效性进行了比较。B-PANAS 量表的二维结构在三项研究中都得到了验证，并且在不同年龄和性别的情况下都是不变的。所有信度指标都支持内部一致性。从与代表认知评价指标的工具（如罗森伯格自尊量表（Rosenberg，1965 年）、生活取向测试修订版（Scheier 等人，1994 年）和生活满意度量表（Diener 等人，1985 年））的相关性来看，B-PANAS 量表的名义网络与 PANAS 量表的名义网络相当。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

European Review of Applied Psychology-Revue Europeenne De Psychologie Appliquee PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-

CiteScore

2.20

自引率

20.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The aim of the Revue européenne de Psychologie appliquée / European Review of Applied Psychology is to promote high-quality applications of psychology to all areas of specialization, and to foster exchange among researchers and professionals. Its policy is to attract a wide range of contributions, including empirical research, overviews of target issues, case studies, descriptions of instruments for research and diagnosis, and theoretical work related to applied psychology. In all cases, authors will refer to published and verificable facts, whether established in the study being reported or in earlier publications.