Analyzing Linear and Angular Deviations After Guided Surgery for Dental Implant Placement: A Preliminary Study.

Catarina Mendes Fonseca, Patrícia Alexandra Barroso da Fonseca, Margarida Martins Quezada, Tiago Marques, Javier Montero, Dean Morton, André Correia
{"title":"Analyzing Linear and Angular Deviations After Guided Surgery for Dental Implant Placement: A Preliminary Study.","authors":"Catarina Mendes Fonseca, Patrícia Alexandra Barroso da Fonseca, Margarida Martins Quezada, Tiago Marques, Javier Montero, Dean Morton, André Correia","doi":"10.11607/jomi.10787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the accuracy and precision of prosthetically driven implant placement achieved through static computer-aided implant surgery by analyzing the linear and angular deviations of implants.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 53 implants were included in the study. The implants were positioned using either tooth-supported templates or tooth-and-tissue-supported templates with fixation pins. Two distinct guided surgery approaches were used: pilot drill guided and fully guided. 3D data from the implant planning phase was superimposed with the 3D data from the final implant positions using the 'Treatment Evaluation' tool within coDiagnostiX implant planning software (Straumann). This enabled the automatic calculation of deviations in implant placement accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average angular deviation observed was 3.90 degrees. For linear deviations, the mean 3D deviation was 1.04 mm at the most coronal point of the implants and 1.56 mm at the implant apex.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This research demonstrates the feasibility of a digital workflow for guided implant surgery, offering a promising treatment option. Nonetheless, it is important to note that deviations do occur, particularly in the apical region of the implant. Care should be taken, particularly in cases of limited bone availability.</p>","PeriodicalId":94230,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","volume":"0 0","pages":"738-744"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.10787","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the accuracy and precision of prosthetically driven implant placement achieved through static computer-aided implant surgery by analyzing the linear and angular deviations of implants.

Materials and methods: A total of 53 implants were included in the study. The implants were positioned using either tooth-supported templates or tooth-and-tissue-supported templates with fixation pins. Two distinct guided surgery approaches were used: pilot drill guided and fully guided. 3D data from the implant planning phase was superimposed with the 3D data from the final implant positions using the 'Treatment Evaluation' tool within coDiagnostiX implant planning software (Straumann). This enabled the automatic calculation of deviations in implant placement accuracy.

Results: The average angular deviation observed was 3.90 degrees. For linear deviations, the mean 3D deviation was 1.04 mm at the most coronal point of the implants and 1.56 mm at the implant apex.

Conclusions: This research demonstrates the feasibility of a digital workflow for guided implant surgery, offering a promising treatment option. Nonetheless, it is important to note that deviations do occur, particularly in the apical region of the implant. Care should be taken, particularly in cases of limited bone availability.

分析种植牙引导手术后的线性和角度偏差:初步研究
目的:本研究旨在评估通过静态计算机辅助种植手术实现的修复驱动种植体植入的准确性和精确度。主要目的是分析在一所大学牙科诊所接受治疗的患者种植体的线性偏差和角度偏差。利用各种手术技术和模板来优化种植体定位:本研究共包括 53 个种植体。种植体使用牙齿支撑模板或牙齿组织支撑模板与固定钉进行定位。使用了两种不同的引导手术方法,即先导钻引导和完全引导。使用CoDiagnostix.种植规划软件(Straumann AG)中的 "治疗评估 "工具,将种植规划阶段的三维数据与最终种植体位置的三维数据进行叠加。这样就可以自动计算种植体植入精度的偏差:结果:观察到的平均角度偏差为 3.90 度。在线性偏差方面,种植体最冠状点的平均三维偏差为1.04毫米,而种植体顶点的平均三维偏差为1.56毫米:这项研究证明了数字化工作流程在引导种植手术方面的可行性,为治疗提供了一种很有前景的选择。然而,需要注意的是,偏差确实存在,种植体顶端区域是受影响最大的区域。尤其是在骨量有限的情况下,更应小心谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信