Prevention of Postoperative Malnutrition with Oral Nutritional Supplements in Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Surgery.

IF 1.7 3区 农林科学 Q4 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL
Journal of medicinal food Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-23 DOI:10.1089/jmf.2023.0204
Jarosław Cwaliński, Agnieszka Cwalińska, Barbara Kuczyńska, Wiktoria Zasada, Hanna Cholerzyńska, Tomasz Banasiewicz, Jacek Paszkowski
{"title":"Prevention of Postoperative Malnutrition with Oral Nutritional Supplements in Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Surgery.","authors":"Jarosław Cwaliński, Agnieszka Cwalińska, Barbara Kuczyńska, Wiktoria Zasada, Hanna Cholerzyńska, Tomasz Banasiewicz, Jacek Paszkowski","doi":"10.1089/jmf.2023.0204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Oral nutritional supplements (ONSs) offer support for the nutritional needs of surgical patients. However, their efficacy is contingent upon the nutrient composition, absorption efficiency, and postingestion tolerance. Our study included a cohort of 84 patients who underwent elective open surgery involving at least one intestine anastomosis. To mitigate the risk of malnutrition, 2 groups of 28 patients each received either a high-protein low-osmotic ONS (Group I) or a high-calorie high-osmotic ONS (Group II). A standard diet was used in the control group (Group III). The metabolic effects were evaluated by measuring body weight and relative change in body weight (Δkg) from 24 h (-1 day) presurgery to 28 days postprocedure. Subjective tolerance following ONS consumption on the second postoperative day was also assessed. Our findings showed that, across all groups, the average body weight decreased during the initial 2 weeks postsurgery, subsequently stabilizing or returning to baseline levels by the third and fourth week of observation. Patients receiving ONS demonstrated greater weight gain between days 14 and 28, with Group I exhibiting the highest rate of gain. Low-osmotic ONS displayed superior tolerance and elicited fewer patient complaints postconsumption. Postoperative hospitalization duration did not differ significantly among the nutritional strategies. In conclusion, early administration of ONS supplies essential nutrients and facilitates refeeding, thereby reducing the risk of malnutrition. Low-osmotic preparations are better tolerated and contribute more effectively to the restoration of preoperative body weight, despite their lower caloric content.</p>","PeriodicalId":16440,"journal":{"name":"Journal of medicinal food","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of medicinal food","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jmf.2023.0204","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Oral nutritional supplements (ONSs) offer support for the nutritional needs of surgical patients. However, their efficacy is contingent upon the nutrient composition, absorption efficiency, and postingestion tolerance. Our study included a cohort of 84 patients who underwent elective open surgery involving at least one intestine anastomosis. To mitigate the risk of malnutrition, 2 groups of 28 patients each received either a high-protein low-osmotic ONS (Group I) or a high-calorie high-osmotic ONS (Group II). A standard diet was used in the control group (Group III). The metabolic effects were evaluated by measuring body weight and relative change in body weight (Δkg) from 24 h (-1 day) presurgery to 28 days postprocedure. Subjective tolerance following ONS consumption on the second postoperative day was also assessed. Our findings showed that, across all groups, the average body weight decreased during the initial 2 weeks postsurgery, subsequently stabilizing or returning to baseline levels by the third and fourth week of observation. Patients receiving ONS demonstrated greater weight gain between days 14 and 28, with Group I exhibiting the highest rate of gain. Low-osmotic ONS displayed superior tolerance and elicited fewer patient complaints postconsumption. Postoperative hospitalization duration did not differ significantly among the nutritional strategies. In conclusion, early administration of ONS supplies essential nutrients and facilitates refeeding, thereby reducing the risk of malnutrition. Low-osmotic preparations are better tolerated and contribute more effectively to the restoration of preoperative body weight, despite their lower caloric content.

通过口服营养补充剂预防胃肠道手术患者术后营养不良。
口服营养补充剂(ONS)可满足手术患者的营养需求。然而,其疗效取决于营养成分、吸收效率和消化道耐受性。我们的研究纳入了 84 名接受择期开放手术(至少涉及一个肠吻合术)的患者。为了降低营养不良的风险,两组各 28 名患者分别接受了高蛋白低渗透压 ONS(I 组)或高热量高渗透压 ONS(II 组)。对照组(第三组)采用标准饮食。通过测量从手术前 24 小时(-1 天)到手术后 28 天的体重和体重相对变化(Δkg)来评估代谢效应。还评估了术后第二天服用 ONS 后的主观耐受性。我们的研究结果表明,在术后最初两周内,所有组别的平均体重都有所下降,随后趋于稳定或在观察的第三周和第四周恢复到基线水平。接受 ONS 治疗的患者在术后第 14 天和第 28 天的体重增加较多,其中 I 组的体重增加率最高。低渗透性 ONS 显示出更高的耐受性,服用后引起的患者投诉也更少。不同营养策略的术后住院时间差异不大。总之,早期服用 ONS 可以提供必需的营养物质,促进再喂养,从而降低营养不良的风险。低渗制剂尽管热量较低,但患者的耐受性更好,也更有助于恢复术前体重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of medicinal food
Journal of medicinal food 医学-食品科技
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
154
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Medicinal Food is the only peer-reviewed journal focusing exclusively on the medicinal value and biomedical effects of food materials. International in scope, the Journal advances the knowledge of the development of new food products and dietary supplements targeted at promoting health and the prevention and treatment of disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信