Clinical performance of different bulk-fill composite resin systems in class II cavities: A 2-year randomized clinical trial

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Badria Goda BDS, MSc, Kareem Hamdi BDS, MSc, PhD, Radwa I. Eltoukhy BDS, MSc, PhD, Ashraf I. Ali BDS, MSc, PhD, Salah Hasab Mahmoud BDS, MSc, PhD
{"title":"Clinical performance of different bulk-fill composite resin systems in class II cavities: A 2-year randomized clinical trial","authors":"Badria Goda BDS, MSc,&nbsp;Kareem Hamdi BDS, MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Radwa I. Eltoukhy BDS, MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Ashraf I. Ali BDS, MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Salah Hasab Mahmoud BDS, MSc, PhD","doi":"10.1111/jerd.13212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This study evaluated the clinical performance of bulk-fill resin composite systems with different viscosities in class II cavities.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 80 class II restorations were performed with a single operator in 50 patients using four different bulk-fill resin composite materials: Filtek™ Bulk Fill, Heated Filtek™ Bulk Fill, G-ænial™ BULK Injectable, and SonicFill3. A double-blinded randomized clinical trial was designed to evaluate the two-year clinical performance of the four bulk-fill composite resins using modified FDI criteria.</p>\n \n <p>Data were analyzed descriptively. Level of significance was set at 0.05. Differences between groups were tested using Wilcoxon-signed-rank and Mann–Whitney-U test as nonparametric tests.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis, Mann–Whitney U, and Wilcoxon signed rank tests (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Eighty restorations were available for evaluation, with a survival function of 100%. No statistically significant differences were observed between the four groups regarding assessing esthetic, functional, and biological properties during different follow-up periods.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>After 2 years of clinical follow-up, the bulk-fill composite systems with different viscosities seem to be esthetically, functionally, and biologically acceptable, with a promising clinical performance in class II cavities.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15988,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jerd.13212","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

This study evaluated the clinical performance of bulk-fill resin composite systems with different viscosities in class II cavities.

Materials and Methods

A total of 80 class II restorations were performed with a single operator in 50 patients using four different bulk-fill resin composite materials: Filtek™ Bulk Fill, Heated Filtek™ Bulk Fill, G-ænial™ BULK Injectable, and SonicFill3. A double-blinded randomized clinical trial was designed to evaluate the two-year clinical performance of the four bulk-fill composite resins using modified FDI criteria.

Data were analyzed descriptively. Level of significance was set at 0.05. Differences between groups were tested using Wilcoxon-signed-rank and Mann–Whitney-U test as nonparametric tests.

Results

Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis, Mann–Whitney U, and Wilcoxon signed rank tests (p < 0.05). Eighty restorations were available for evaluation, with a survival function of 100%. No statistically significant differences were observed between the four groups regarding assessing esthetic, functional, and biological properties during different follow-up periods.

Conclusions

After 2 years of clinical follow-up, the bulk-fill composite systems with different viscosities seem to be esthetically, functionally, and biologically acceptable, with a promising clinical performance in class II cavities.

不同体填复合树脂系统在 II 类龋洞中的临床表现:为期两年的随机临床试验
研究目的本研究评估了不同粘度的批量填充树脂复合材料系统在II类龋洞中的临床表现:由一名操作者使用四种不同的填充树脂复合材料对 50 名患者进行了 80 例 II 类修复:Filtek™ Bulk Fill、Heated Filtek™ Bulk Fill、G-aenial™ BULK Injectable 和 SonicFill3。设计了一项双盲随机临床试验,采用改良的 FDI 标准评估四种填充型复合树脂两年的临床表现。对数据进行了描述性分析。显著性水平设定为 0.05。组间差异采用 Wilcoxon-signed-rank 检验和 Mann-Whitney-U 检验作为非参数检验:数据采用 Kruskal-Wallis、Mann-Whitney U 和 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验进行分析(P 结论):经过两年的临床随访,不同粘度的膨体填充复合材料系统似乎在美学、功能和生物学方面都是可以接受的,在二类龋洞中的临床表现很有希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
124
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry (JERD) is the longest standing peer-reviewed journal devoted solely to advancing the knowledge and practice of esthetic dentistry. Its goal is to provide the very latest evidence-based information in the realm of contemporary interdisciplinary esthetic dentistry through high quality clinical papers, sound research reports and educational features. The range of topics covered in the journal includes: - Interdisciplinary esthetic concepts - Implants - Conservative adhesive restorations - Tooth Whitening - Prosthodontic materials and techniques - Dental materials - Orthodontic, periodontal and endodontic esthetics - Esthetics related research - Innovations in esthetics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信