A scoping review of feedback in physical education: Conceptualisations and the role of teachers and students

IF 2.6 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Paul Treschman, Michalis Stylianou, Cam Brooks
{"title":"A scoping review of feedback in physical education: Conceptualisations and the role of teachers and students","authors":"Paul Treschman, Michalis Stylianou, Cam Brooks","doi":"10.1177/1356336x241230829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Given the important role of feedback in student learning, this scoping review investigated how feedback has been conceptualised and examined, and how the teacher and student have been positioned in feedback processes in physical education (PE) research. Following recommended processes for conducting a scoping review, 110 papers were included, and data were extracted and synthesised to address the aim. Findings identified a lack of conceptual and theoretical underpinnings, and considerable variability in feedback terminology used in PE. Feedback was mainly positioned as being transmitted verbally from the teacher to the student to evaluate performances. Research methods mainly focused on the teacher's feedback behaviours, with less attention given to how the student receives, interprets, and uses feedback to advance their learning. Based on the findings, we recommend that future feedback research in PE is underpinned by theory and frameworks that acknowledge the active role of both the teacher and the student in the feedback process. Additionally, given the critical element of feedback effectiveness is not in the provision of feedback, but how it is interpreted and used, research methods that further consider how students engage with feedback opportunities are required. If we are to maximise feedback's learning potential, future PE research and practices should consider how students can be further activated in the feedback process.","PeriodicalId":47681,"journal":{"name":"European Physical Education Review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Physical Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336x241230829","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Given the important role of feedback in student learning, this scoping review investigated how feedback has been conceptualised and examined, and how the teacher and student have been positioned in feedback processes in physical education (PE) research. Following recommended processes for conducting a scoping review, 110 papers were included, and data were extracted and synthesised to address the aim. Findings identified a lack of conceptual and theoretical underpinnings, and considerable variability in feedback terminology used in PE. Feedback was mainly positioned as being transmitted verbally from the teacher to the student to evaluate performances. Research methods mainly focused on the teacher's feedback behaviours, with less attention given to how the student receives, interprets, and uses feedback to advance their learning. Based on the findings, we recommend that future feedback research in PE is underpinned by theory and frameworks that acknowledge the active role of both the teacher and the student in the feedback process. Additionally, given the critical element of feedback effectiveness is not in the provision of feedback, but how it is interpreted and used, research methods that further consider how students engage with feedback opportunities are required. If we are to maximise feedback's learning potential, future PE research and practices should consider how students can be further activated in the feedback process.
对体育教学中的反馈进行范围审查:概念以及教师和学生的作用
鉴于反馈在学生学习中的重要作用,本范围综述调查了在体育教育(PE)研究中如何对反馈进行概念化和研究,以及在反馈过程中如何定位教师和学生。按照建议的范围界定综述流程,共收录了 110 篇论文,并针对目标提取和综合了数据。研究结果表明,体育课中使用的反馈术语缺乏概念和理论依据,而且存在相当大的差异。反馈主要被定位为从教师到学生的口头传递,以评价学生的表现。研究方法主要集中于教师的反馈行为,而较少关注学生如何接收、解释和使用反馈来促进他们的学习。根据研究结果,我们建议今后的体育反馈研究应以承认教师和学生在反馈过程中的积极作用的理论和框架为基础。此外,鉴于反馈有效性的关键因素不在于提供反馈,而在于如何解释和使用反馈,因此需要进一步考虑学生如何利用反馈机会的研究方法。如果我们要最大限度地发挥反馈的学习潜力,未来的体育研究和实践就应考虑如何在反馈过程中进一步激活学生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Physical Education Review
European Physical Education Review EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: - Multidisciplinary Approaches: European Physical Education Review brings together contributions from a wide range of disciplines across the natural and social sciences and humanities. It includes theoretical and research-based articles and occasionally devotes Special Issues to major topics and themes within the field. - International Coverage: European Physical Education Review publishes contributions from Europe and all regions of the world, promoting international communication among scholars and professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信