The Impact of Implant Abutment Angle and Height on Peri-implant Tissue Health: Retrospective Analyses from a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Florian Rathe, Rüdiger Junker, Julia Blumenröhr, Lukas Martin, Niklas Löhlein, Christian Heumann, Thorsten Auschill, Nicole Arweiler, Markus Schlee
{"title":"The Impact of Implant Abutment Angle and Height on Peri-implant Tissue Health: Retrospective Analyses from a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.","authors":"Florian Rathe, Rüdiger Junker, Julia Blumenröhr, Lukas Martin, Niklas Löhlein, Christian Heumann, Thorsten Auschill, Nicole Arweiler, Markus Schlee","doi":"10.11607/ijp.8138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To examine the influence of abutment emergence angle and abutment height on marginal peri-implant bone stability in patients not considered susceptible to peri-implantitis. Furthermore, it was analyzed whether titanium-base (Ti-base) abutments lead to wider abutment emergence angles compared to one-piece abutments.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 48 abutments (ie, 24 Ti-base and 24 one-piece abutments in 24 patients) were evaluated at abutment installation, after 1 year, and thereafter on a yearly basis for up to 5 years. Clinical and radiographic outcome variables were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With regard to peri-implant marginal bone stability, only moderately negative, albeit significant, correlations were found on the mesial sides of the one-piece abutments after 4 and 5 years for an abutment emergence angle > 30 degrees. No statistically significant negative correlations were found for distances of ≤ 1.5 mm between the restoration margin and the crestal peri-implant bone level for either Ti-base or for one-piece abutments. Furthermore, abutments bonded to Ti-bases were not associated with larger emergence angles than one-piece abutments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For patients at low risk of developing peri-implantitis, it can be concluded that neither a larger abutment emergence angle (> 30 degrees) nor a distance of ≤ 1.5 mm between the restoration margin and the crestal peri-implant bone level are associated with marginal peri-implant bone loss. Furthermore, abutments bonded to Ti-bases are not associated with wider emergence angles than one-piece abutments.</p>","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.8138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the influence of abutment emergence angle and abutment height on marginal peri-implant bone stability in patients not considered susceptible to peri-implantitis. Furthermore, it was analyzed whether titanium-base (Ti-base) abutments lead to wider abutment emergence angles compared to one-piece abutments.

Materials and methods: A total of 48 abutments (ie, 24 Ti-base and 24 one-piece abutments in 24 patients) were evaluated at abutment installation, after 1 year, and thereafter on a yearly basis for up to 5 years. Clinical and radiographic outcome variables were assessed.

Results: With regard to peri-implant marginal bone stability, only moderately negative, albeit significant, correlations were found on the mesial sides of the one-piece abutments after 4 and 5 years for an abutment emergence angle > 30 degrees. No statistically significant negative correlations were found for distances of ≤ 1.5 mm between the restoration margin and the crestal peri-implant bone level for either Ti-base or for one-piece abutments. Furthermore, abutments bonded to Ti-bases were not associated with larger emergence angles than one-piece abutments.

Conclusions: For patients at low risk of developing peri-implantitis, it can be concluded that neither a larger abutment emergence angle (> 30 degrees) nor a distance of ≤ 1.5 mm between the restoration margin and the crestal peri-implant bone level are associated with marginal peri-implant bone loss. Furthermore, abutments bonded to Ti-bases are not associated with wider emergence angles than one-piece abutments.

种植体基台角度和高度对种植体周围组织健康的影响:一项随机对照临床试验的回顾性分析
目的:在不容易患种植体周围炎的患者中,研究基台出现角和基台高度对种植体周围边缘骨稳定性的影响。此外,还分析了与一体式基台相比,钛基台(Ti-base)是否会导致更宽的基台出现角:共对48个基台(即24名患者的24个钛基台和24个一体式基台)进行了基台安装时、1年后的评估,此后每年评估一次,评估期长达5年。结果:结果:在种植体周围边缘骨稳定性方面,4年和5年后,在基台出现角度大于30度的情况下,在一片式基台的中侧仅发现中度负相关,尽管有显著性。无论是钛基底基台还是一体式基台,在修复体边缘与种植体周围骨水平之间的距离≤ 1.5 mm时,都没有发现统计学意义上的负相关。此外,与一体式基台相比,与钛基台粘结的基台与较大的出龈角无关:结论:对于种植体周围炎发病风险较低的患者来说,无论是较大的基台倾角(大于30度),还是修复体边缘与种植体周围骨嵴之间的距离小于1.5 mm,都不会导致种植体周围骨质流失。此外,与一体式基台相比,与钛基台粘结的基台与更大的出龈角无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信