Leander Schwaibold, Sven Mattern, Markus Mählmann, Leon Lobert, Thomas Breunig, Christian M Schürch
{"title":"[Effects of upstream laboratory processes on the digitization of histological slides].","authors":"Leander Schwaibold, Sven Mattern, Markus Mählmann, Leon Lobert, Thomas Breunig, Christian M Schürch","doi":"10.1007/s00292-024-01303-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several factors in glass slide (GS) preparation affect the quality and data volume of a digitized histological slide. In particular, reducing contamination and selecting the appropriate coverslip have the potential to significantly reduce scan time and data volume.</p><p><strong>Goals: </strong>To objectify observations from our institute's digitization process to determine the impact of laboratory processes on the quality of digital histology slides.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Experiment 1: Scanning the GS before and after installation of a central console in the microtomy area to reduce dirt and statistical analysis of the determined parameters. Experiment 2: Re-coverslipping the GS (post diagnostics) with glass and film. Scanning the GS and statistical analysis of the collected parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The targeted restructuring in the laboratory process leads to a reduction of GS contamination. This causes a significant reduction in the amount of data generated and scanning time required for the digitized sections. Film as a coverslip material minimizes processing errors in contrast to glass. According to our estimation, all the above-mentioned points lead to considerable cost savings.</p>","PeriodicalId":74402,"journal":{"name":"Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":"90-97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10901962/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00292-024-01303-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Several factors in glass slide (GS) preparation affect the quality and data volume of a digitized histological slide. In particular, reducing contamination and selecting the appropriate coverslip have the potential to significantly reduce scan time and data volume.
Goals: To objectify observations from our institute's digitization process to determine the impact of laboratory processes on the quality of digital histology slides.
Materials and methods: Experiment 1: Scanning the GS before and after installation of a central console in the microtomy area to reduce dirt and statistical analysis of the determined parameters. Experiment 2: Re-coverslipping the GS (post diagnostics) with glass and film. Scanning the GS and statistical analysis of the collected parameters.
Conclusion: The targeted restructuring in the laboratory process leads to a reduction of GS contamination. This causes a significant reduction in the amount of data generated and scanning time required for the digitized sections. Film as a coverslip material minimizes processing errors in contrast to glass. According to our estimation, all the above-mentioned points lead to considerable cost savings.