Internet-based behavioural activation therapy versus online psychoeducation for self-reported suicidal ideation in individuals with depression in Indonesia: a secondary analysis of an RCT.
Caroline B B C M Heuschen, Koen Bolhuis, Jasper B Zantvoord, Retha Arjadi, Damiaan A J P Denys, Maaike H Nauta, Anja Lok, Claudi L Bockting
{"title":"Internet-based behavioural activation therapy versus online psychoeducation for self-reported suicidal ideation in individuals with depression in Indonesia: a secondary analysis of an RCT.","authors":"Caroline B B C M Heuschen, Koen Bolhuis, Jasper B Zantvoord, Retha Arjadi, Damiaan A J P Denys, Maaike H Nauta, Anja Lok, Claudi L Bockting","doi":"10.1136/bmjment-2023-300918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Southeast Asia has the highest suicide mortality worldwide. To improve our knowledge on the effectiveness of interventions for suicidal ideation (SI) in individuals with depression in Indonesia, we conducted a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We explored whether an internet-based behavioural activation (BA) intervention ('Guided Act and Feel Indonesia' (GAF-ID)) was superior in targeting SI compared with online-delivered psychoeducation (PE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 313 participants were randomised between treatment allocation. The SI item of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 was the primary outcome measure. Mediation analyses were conducted to identify if BA at week 10 mediated the relationship between intervention and SI at week 24.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The GAF-ID intervention was not superior in reducing SI compared with online minimal PE at week 10 (OR 0.61, 95% CI (0.37 to 1.01)), nor at week 24 (OR 0.84, 95% CI (0.47 to 1.52)). SI at week 24 was not mediated by BA at week 10 (b=-0.03, 95% CI (-0.05 to 0.00), p=0.07).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In individuals with depression in Indonesia, the GAF-ID intervention was not superior in reducing self-reported SI compared with PE. Also, the association between treatment condition and SI at week 24 was not mediated via BA at week 10.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>This study supports the need for further research on the efficacy of psychological treatments targeting SI in the Southeast Asia context.</p>","PeriodicalId":72434,"journal":{"name":"BMJ mental health","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10882357/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2023-300918","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Southeast Asia has the highest suicide mortality worldwide. To improve our knowledge on the effectiveness of interventions for suicidal ideation (SI) in individuals with depression in Indonesia, we conducted a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.
Objective: We explored whether an internet-based behavioural activation (BA) intervention ('Guided Act and Feel Indonesia' (GAF-ID)) was superior in targeting SI compared with online-delivered psychoeducation (PE).
Methods: In total, 313 participants were randomised between treatment allocation. The SI item of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 was the primary outcome measure. Mediation analyses were conducted to identify if BA at week 10 mediated the relationship between intervention and SI at week 24.
Findings: The GAF-ID intervention was not superior in reducing SI compared with online minimal PE at week 10 (OR 0.61, 95% CI (0.37 to 1.01)), nor at week 24 (OR 0.84, 95% CI (0.47 to 1.52)). SI at week 24 was not mediated by BA at week 10 (b=-0.03, 95% CI (-0.05 to 0.00), p=0.07).
Conclusions: In individuals with depression in Indonesia, the GAF-ID intervention was not superior in reducing self-reported SI compared with PE. Also, the association between treatment condition and SI at week 24 was not mediated via BA at week 10.
Clinical implications: This study supports the need for further research on the efficacy of psychological treatments targeting SI in the Southeast Asia context.
背景:东南亚是全球自杀死亡率最高的地区。为了增进我们对印度尼西亚抑郁症患者自杀意念(SI)干预效果的了解,我们对一项随机对照试验进行了二次分析:我们探讨了与在线心理教育(PE)相比,基于互联网的行为激活(BA)干预("印度尼西亚指导行动与感受"(GAF-ID))在针对自杀意念(SI)方面是否更有优势:共有 313 名参与者被随机分配到不同的治疗方案中。患者健康问卷-9中的SI项目是主要的结果测量指标。研究人员进行了中介分析,以确定第 10 周的 BA 是否对第 24 周的干预与 SI 之间的关系起中介作用:在第 10 周(OR 0.61,95% CI (0.37 to 1.01))和第 24 周(OR 0.84,95% CI (0.47 to 1.52)),GAF-ID 干预在降低 SI 方面与在线最小 PE 相比并无优势。第24周的SI不受第10周BA的影响(b=-0.03,95% CI (-0.05 to 0.00),p=0.07):结论:在印度尼西亚的抑郁症患者中,GAF-ID干预与PE相比,在减少自我报告的SI方面并无优势。此外,治疗条件与第 24 周的 SI 之间的关系也不是通过第 10 周的 BA 来调节的:本研究表明,有必要在东南亚地区进一步研究针对 SI 的心理疗法的疗效。