Parental Stress, Infant Feeding and Well-being in Families Affected by Cleft Lip and/or Cleft Palate: The Impact of Early Follow-up.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q2 Dentistry
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-21 DOI:10.1177/10556656241231524
Nina Ellefsen Lindberg, Nina Margrethe Kynø, Kristin Billaud Feragen, Are Hugo Pripp, Kim Alexander Tønseth
{"title":"Parental Stress, Infant Feeding and Well-being in Families Affected by Cleft Lip and/or Cleft Palate: The Impact of Early Follow-up.","authors":"Nina Ellefsen Lindberg, Nina Margrethe Kynø, Kristin Billaud Feragen, Are Hugo Pripp, Kim Alexander Tønseth","doi":"10.1177/10556656241231524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveTo document the impact of early follow-up by specialized cleft nurses (SCNs) provided to families affected by cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) and the status of parental stress, infant feeding and well-being.DesignProspective inclusion of a control group, which only received standard care, followed by an intervention group that also received early SCN follow-up.SettingThe cleft lip and palate team at Oslo University Hospital, Norway.ParticipantsSeventy families (69 mothers and 57 fathers) distributed into an intervention group (n = 32) and a control group (n = 38).InterventionSCNs provided a consultation at the maternity ward and a follow-up conversation by phone or face-to-face at scheduled times for six months.Outcome measuresParental Stress Index (PSI), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-14), feeding questionnaire, survey of infant diets, weight percentiles.ResultsThe mothers reported higher stress scores than the fathers, but in the control group only in the PSI parent domain at T2 and T3 (<i>P</i> = .007, <i>P</i> = .018). Infants in the intervention group used pacifiers less frequently than in the control group (55.2% vs. 81.1%, <i>P</i> = .023). Otherwise, no significant differences were found between the groups. Overall, the infants received less breast milk than norms.ConclusionContextual strategies for early follow-up of families affected by clefts need to be developed, with an emphasis on involving fathers and those parents reporting elevated stress and/or feeding difficulties. There is a need for diagnosis-specific guidelines about the use of pacifiers as well as collaboration between the health professionals involved to increase breastmilk feeding.</p>","PeriodicalId":49220,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":" ","pages":"882-893"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241231524","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveTo document the impact of early follow-up by specialized cleft nurses (SCNs) provided to families affected by cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) and the status of parental stress, infant feeding and well-being.DesignProspective inclusion of a control group, which only received standard care, followed by an intervention group that also received early SCN follow-up.SettingThe cleft lip and palate team at Oslo University Hospital, Norway.ParticipantsSeventy families (69 mothers and 57 fathers) distributed into an intervention group (n = 32) and a control group (n = 38).InterventionSCNs provided a consultation at the maternity ward and a follow-up conversation by phone or face-to-face at scheduled times for six months.Outcome measuresParental Stress Index (PSI), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-14), feeding questionnaire, survey of infant diets, weight percentiles.ResultsThe mothers reported higher stress scores than the fathers, but in the control group only in the PSI parent domain at T2 and T3 (P = .007, P = .018). Infants in the intervention group used pacifiers less frequently than in the control group (55.2% vs. 81.1%, P = .023). Otherwise, no significant differences were found between the groups. Overall, the infants received less breast milk than norms.ConclusionContextual strategies for early follow-up of families affected by clefts need to be developed, with an emphasis on involving fathers and those parents reporting elevated stress and/or feeding difficulties. There is a need for diagnosis-specific guidelines about the use of pacifiers as well as collaboration between the health professionals involved to increase breastmilk feeding.

受唇裂和/或腭裂影响家庭的父母压力、婴儿喂养和福祉:早期随访的影响。
摘要记录唇裂和/或腭裂(CL/P)专业护士(SCNs)为受影响家庭提供的早期随访的影响,以及父母的压力、婴儿喂养和福利状况:设计:前瞻性纳入对照组,对照组只接受标准护理,然后纳入干预组,干预组也接受唇腭裂专科护士的早期随访:地点:挪威奥斯陆大学医院唇腭裂小组:70 个家庭(69 位母亲和 57 位父亲)分为干预组(32 人)和对照组(38 人):干预措施:SCN 在产科病房提供咨询,并在预定时间通过电话或面对面进行后续谈话,为期六个月:结果:母亲的压力指数(PSI)、感知压力量表(PSS-14)、喂养问卷、婴儿饮食调查、体重百分位数:母亲的压力得分高于父亲,但对照组仅在 T2 和 T3 的 PSI 父母领域得分较高(P = .007, P = .018)。干预组婴儿使用安抚奶嘴的频率低于对照组(55.2% 对 81.1%,P = .023)。除此之外,两组之间没有发现明显差异。总体而言,干预组婴儿的母乳摄入量低于对照组:结论:需要为受裂隙影响的家庭制定早期随访的背景策略,重点是让父亲和那些报告压力增大和/或喂养困难的父母参与进来。有必要制定有关使用安抚奶嘴的特定诊断指南,以及相关医疗专业人员之间的合作,以增加母乳喂养。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
36.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal (CPCJ) is the premiere peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to current research on etiology, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment in all areas pertaining to craniofacial anomalies. CPCJ reports on basic science and clinical research aimed at better elucidating the pathogenesis, pathology, and optimal methods of treatment of cleft and craniofacial anomalies. The journal strives to foster communication and cooperation among professionals from all specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信