Ophthalmic artery stenosis on three-dimensional rotational angiography: Interrater agreement, prevalence, and risk factors.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
William K Diprose, Michael T M Wang, Joseph Reidy, Alice Ma, James Brodie, Brendan Steinfort
{"title":"Ophthalmic artery stenosis on three-dimensional rotational angiography: Interrater agreement, prevalence, and risk factors.","authors":"William K Diprose, Michael T M Wang, Joseph Reidy, Alice Ma, James Brodie, Brendan Steinfort","doi":"10.1177/15910199241233020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is emerging interest in ophthalmic artery (OA) stenosis angioplasty for the treatment of age-related macular degeneration. Three-dimensional rotational angiography (3DRA) could be used during conventional angiography to determine the presence and severity of OA stenosis. In patients who had undergone 3DRA of the internal carotid artery, we aimed to assess the interrater agreement, prevalence, and risk factors for OA stenosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients from two centers who had undergone conventional angiography with 3DRA of the internal carotid arteries were enrolled in this study. 3DRAs were independently double read for the presence of OA stenosis, as defined as narrowing of the proximal OA of at least 50% when compared to the more distal \"normal\" OA. Interrater agreement for the evaluation of OA stenosis was assessed with the Cohen's kappa coefficient. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression were used to identify potential predictors of OA stenosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred and two patients (97 men; mean ± SD 57.6 ± 13.4 years) were included in the analysis. Cohen's kappa coefficient (95% CI) was 0.877 (0.798-0.956). OA stenosis was present in 45 patients (14.9%). Multiple logistic regression demonstrated that female sex (odds ratio [OR] = 2.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18-6.09, <i>p</i> = 0.02) and smoking (OR = 2.11, 95% CI 1.10-4.06, <i>p</i> = 0.03) were significant risk factors for OA stenosis. Age, hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease, and subarachnoid hemorrhage were not associated with OA stenosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The evaluation of OA stenosis on 3DRA had excellent interrater agreement. OA stenosis was common and was associated with smoking and female sex.</p>","PeriodicalId":49174,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199241233020","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is emerging interest in ophthalmic artery (OA) stenosis angioplasty for the treatment of age-related macular degeneration. Three-dimensional rotational angiography (3DRA) could be used during conventional angiography to determine the presence and severity of OA stenosis. In patients who had undergone 3DRA of the internal carotid artery, we aimed to assess the interrater agreement, prevalence, and risk factors for OA stenosis.

Methods: Consecutive patients from two centers who had undergone conventional angiography with 3DRA of the internal carotid arteries were enrolled in this study. 3DRAs were independently double read for the presence of OA stenosis, as defined as narrowing of the proximal OA of at least 50% when compared to the more distal "normal" OA. Interrater agreement for the evaluation of OA stenosis was assessed with the Cohen's kappa coefficient. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression were used to identify potential predictors of OA stenosis.

Results: Three hundred and two patients (97 men; mean ± SD 57.6 ± 13.4 years) were included in the analysis. Cohen's kappa coefficient (95% CI) was 0.877 (0.798-0.956). OA stenosis was present in 45 patients (14.9%). Multiple logistic regression demonstrated that female sex (odds ratio [OR] = 2.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18-6.09, p = 0.02) and smoking (OR = 2.11, 95% CI 1.10-4.06, p = 0.03) were significant risk factors for OA stenosis. Age, hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease, and subarachnoid hemorrhage were not associated with OA stenosis.

Conclusion: The evaluation of OA stenosis on 3DRA had excellent interrater agreement. OA stenosis was common and was associated with smoking and female sex.

三维旋转血管造影中的眼动脉狭窄:互译一致性、患病率和风险因素。
背景:眼动脉(OA)狭窄血管成形术治疗老年性黄斑变性的兴趣日渐浓厚。三维旋转血管造影术(3DRA)可用于传统血管造影术,以确定是否存在OA狭窄及其严重程度。在颈内动脉接受过三维旋转血管造影术的患者中,我们旨在评估三者之间的一致性、OA狭窄的发生率和风险因素:本研究招募了来自两个中心的连续患者,他们都接受了常规血管造影术和颈内动脉 3DRA 检查。对 3DRA 进行独立双读,以确定是否存在 OA 狭窄,OA 狭窄的定义是与较远端 "正常 "的 OA 相比,近端 OA 至少狭窄 50%。用科恩卡帕系数评估了评估 OA 狭窄的相互间一致性。采用单变量和多变量逻辑回归确定 OA 狭窄的潜在预测因素:分析共纳入 32 名患者(97 名男性;平均 ± SD 57.6 ± 13.4 岁)。科恩卡帕系数(95% CI)为 0.877 (0.798-0.956)。45 名患者(14.9%)存在 OA 狭窄。多元逻辑回归显示,女性(几率比[OR] = 2.70,95% 置信区间[CI] 1.18-6.09,P = 0.02)和吸烟(OR = 2.11,95% 置信区间[CI] 1.10-4.06,P = 0.03)是导致 OA 狭窄的重要风险因素。年龄、高血压、糖尿病、冠状动脉疾病和蛛网膜下腔出血与 OA 狭窄无关:结论:3DRA 对 OA 狭窄的评估具有极佳的互评一致性。结论:3DRA 对 OA 狭窄的评估具有极佳的相互一致性,OA 狭窄很常见,与吸烟和女性性别有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Interventional Neuroradiology
Interventional Neuroradiology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信