The New Creatinine-Based Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) 2021 Equation: Potential Impact on Screening for Chronic Kidney Disease in an Asymptomatic Black African Population.

IF 1.8 Q3 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Geoffrey Omuse, Daniel Maina, Ahmed Sokwala
{"title":"The New Creatinine-Based Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) 2021 Equation: Potential Impact on Screening for Chronic Kidney Disease in an Asymptomatic Black African Population.","authors":"Geoffrey Omuse, Daniel Maina, Ahmed Sokwala","doi":"10.1093/jalm/jfae002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2021, a new Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology (CKD-EPI) Collaboration equation was introduced that excluded race correction. We set out to compare estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) determined using the creatinine-based CKD-EPI 2009 and 2021 equations and the reclassification of chronic kidney disease (CKD) eGFR staging to explore the potential ramifications of adopting the 2021 equation on reported eGFR and CKD staging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed secondary data previously utilized to determine reference intervals among Black African individuals residing in urban towns in Kenya. Serum creatinine was measured using a standardized modified Jaffé kinetic method on a Beckman AU5800 analyzer. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was estimated using both the 2009 and 2021 CKD-EPI creatinine equations. Classification of CKD based on eGFR was performed using the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) practice guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using 533 study samples, the median eGFR was highest when determined using the race-corrected CKD-EPI 2009 equation. The CKD-EPI 2021 equation yielded a median eGFR that was similar to the non-race-corrected CKD-EPI 2009 equation. The race-corrected CKD-EPI 2009 equation classified 93.6% of participants into CKD stage G1 compared with 85.6% by the CKD-EPI 2021 equation. The CKD-EPI 2021 equation classified 14.3% of participants into CKD stage G2 compared to 6.4% by the race-corrected CKD-EPI 2009 equation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CKD-EPI 2021 equation gave a comparable eGFR to the non-race-corrected CKD-EPI 2009 equation and its implementation in laboratories reporting eGFR in Kenya will help in identifying patients with an appropriate decrease in renal function.</p>","PeriodicalId":46361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfae002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In 2021, a new Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology (CKD-EPI) Collaboration equation was introduced that excluded race correction. We set out to compare estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) determined using the creatinine-based CKD-EPI 2009 and 2021 equations and the reclassification of chronic kidney disease (CKD) eGFR staging to explore the potential ramifications of adopting the 2021 equation on reported eGFR and CKD staging.

Methods: We analyzed secondary data previously utilized to determine reference intervals among Black African individuals residing in urban towns in Kenya. Serum creatinine was measured using a standardized modified Jaffé kinetic method on a Beckman AU5800 analyzer. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was estimated using both the 2009 and 2021 CKD-EPI creatinine equations. Classification of CKD based on eGFR was performed using the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) practice guidelines.

Results: Using 533 study samples, the median eGFR was highest when determined using the race-corrected CKD-EPI 2009 equation. The CKD-EPI 2021 equation yielded a median eGFR that was similar to the non-race-corrected CKD-EPI 2009 equation. The race-corrected CKD-EPI 2009 equation classified 93.6% of participants into CKD stage G1 compared with 85.6% by the CKD-EPI 2021 equation. The CKD-EPI 2021 equation classified 14.3% of participants into CKD stage G2 compared to 6.4% by the race-corrected CKD-EPI 2009 equation.

Conclusions: The CKD-EPI 2021 equation gave a comparable eGFR to the non-race-corrected CKD-EPI 2009 equation and its implementation in laboratories reporting eGFR in Kenya will help in identifying patients with an appropriate decrease in renal function.

基于肌酸酐的慢性肾脏病流行病学合作(CKD-EPI)2021 新方程:对无症状非洲黑人慢性肾病筛查的潜在影响。
背景:2021年,新的慢性肾脏病流行病学(CKD-EPI)合作方程被引入,其中不包括种族校正。我们对使用基于肌酐的 CKD-EPI 2009 和 2021 方程确定的估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)以及慢性肾脏病(CKD)eGFR 分期的重新分类进行了比较,以探讨采用 2021 方程对报告的 eGFR 和 CKD 分期的潜在影响:我们分析了以前用于确定居住在肯尼亚城镇的非洲黑人参考区间的二手数据。血清肌酐是在贝克曼 AU5800 分析仪上使用标准化的改良贾菲动力学法测定的。肾小球滤过率(GFR)采用 2009 年和 2021 年 CKD-EPI 肌酐方程进行估算。根据 eGFR 对 CKD 进行分类,采用的是肾脏病:结果:结果:在 533 个研究样本中,使用经种族校正的 CKD-EPI 2009 方程确定的 eGFR 中位数最高。CKD-EPI 2021方程得出的eGFR中位数与未经种族校正的CKD-EPI 2009方程相似。经种族校正的 CKD-EPI 2009 方程将 93.6% 的参与者划分为 CKD G1 期,而 CKD-EPI 2021 方程则将 85.6% 的参与者划分为 G1 期。CKD-EPI 2021方程将14.3%的参与者划分为CKD G2期,而种族校正后的CKD-EPI 2009方程则将6.4%的参与者划分为CKD G2期:CKD-EPI 2021方程得出的eGFR与未经种族校正的CKD-EPI 2009方程相当,在肯尼亚报告eGFR的实验室中采用该方程将有助于识别肾功能适当下降的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine
Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
137
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信