Statin Therapy and Flow-Mediated Dilation: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis Using the GRADE of Data from Randomized Controlled Trials.

IF 1.5 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Seyyed Mostafa Arabi, Mahla Chambari, Leila Sadat Bahrami, Saeid Hadi, Amirhossein Sahebkar
{"title":"Statin Therapy and Flow-Mediated Dilation: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis Using the GRADE of Data from Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Seyyed Mostafa Arabi, Mahla Chambari, Leila Sadat Bahrami, Saeid Hadi, Amirhossein Sahebkar","doi":"10.2174/0115734021280797240212091416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A previous meta-analysis reported the positive effects of statin therapy on endothelial function. However, the obtained result had several limitations that necessitated updating the information in this field. Therefore, a systematic and meta-analysis review was conducted to determine whether statin therapy could improve endothelial function, as assessed by flow-- mediated dilation (FMD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE, SciVerse Scopus, and Clarivate Analytics Web of Science were searched to identify randomized placebo-controlled trials assessing the impact of statin therapy on FMD. A random-effects model was used for meta-analysis to calculate the mean difference in weight. Meta- regression and subgroup analyses were used to identify sources of heterogeneity. In addition, nonlinear dose-response, quality of evidence, influence analysis, and publication bias evaluation were assessed using standard methods.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Thirty-five trials (41 arms) involving 2178 participants were included in the meta-analysis study. Statin treatment significantly improved FMD [weighted mean difference (WMD): 1.7%, 95% CI: 1.3-2.2, p < 0.001). However, significant heterogeneity was observed (I<sup>2</sup>=97.9%, p < 0.001). The results of the subgroup analysis showed that health status can contribute to heterogeneity. Non-linear dose-response analysis revealed the most significant improvement in FMD with atorvastatin at a dose of 20 mg/day and simvastatin at 80 mg/day.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Statin therapy significantly improved endothelial function, as assessed by FMD. These changes are clinically significant, but their use should be approached with caution.</p>","PeriodicalId":45941,"journal":{"name":"Current Hypertension Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Hypertension Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115734021280797240212091416","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: A previous meta-analysis reported the positive effects of statin therapy on endothelial function. However, the obtained result had several limitations that necessitated updating the information in this field. Therefore, a systematic and meta-analysis review was conducted to determine whether statin therapy could improve endothelial function, as assessed by flow-- mediated dilation (FMD).

Methods: MEDLINE, SciVerse Scopus, and Clarivate Analytics Web of Science were searched to identify randomized placebo-controlled trials assessing the impact of statin therapy on FMD. A random-effects model was used for meta-analysis to calculate the mean difference in weight. Meta- regression and subgroup analyses were used to identify sources of heterogeneity. In addition, nonlinear dose-response, quality of evidence, influence analysis, and publication bias evaluation were assessed using standard methods.

Result: Thirty-five trials (41 arms) involving 2178 participants were included in the meta-analysis study. Statin treatment significantly improved FMD [weighted mean difference (WMD): 1.7%, 95% CI: 1.3-2.2, p < 0.001). However, significant heterogeneity was observed (I2=97.9%, p < 0.001). The results of the subgroup analysis showed that health status can contribute to heterogeneity. Non-linear dose-response analysis revealed the most significant improvement in FMD with atorvastatin at a dose of 20 mg/day and simvastatin at 80 mg/day.

Conclusion: Statin therapy significantly improved endothelial function, as assessed by FMD. These changes are clinically significant, but their use should be approached with caution.

他汀类药物治疗与血流介导的扩张:使用随机对照试验数据 GRADE 进行的系统回顾和剂量反应元分析
导言之前的一项荟萃分析报告了他汀类药物治疗对内皮功能的积极影响。然而,所获得的结果存在一些局限性,因此有必要更新这一领域的信息。因此,我们进行了一项系统性荟萃分析综述,以确定他汀类药物治疗是否能改善内皮功能,该功能通过血流介导的扩张(FMD)进行评估:方法:检索了MEDLINE、SciVerse Scopus和Clarivate Analytics Web of Science,以确定评估他汀类药物治疗对FMD影响的随机安慰剂对照试验。荟萃分析采用随机效应模型计算体重的平均差异。元回归和亚组分析用于确定异质性的来源。此外,还使用标准方法评估了非线性剂量反应、证据质量、影响分析和发表偏倚评价:荟萃分析研究共纳入 35 项试验(41 项研究),涉及 2178 名参与者。他汀类药物治疗可明显改善 FMD [加权平均差(WMD):1.7%,95% CI:1.3-2.2,P < 0.001]。然而,观察到了明显的异质性(I2=97.9%,p < 0.001)。亚组分析结果表明,健康状况可能导致异质性。非线性剂量反应分析显示,阿托伐他汀剂量为20毫克/天时,FMD的改善最为显著;辛伐他汀剂量为80毫克/天时,FMD的改善最为显著:结论:他汀类药物治疗可明显改善内皮功能(以 FMD 评估)。结论:他汀类药物能明显改善血管内皮功能(以 FMD 评估)。这些变化具有临床意义,但应谨慎使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Hypertension Reviews
Current Hypertension Reviews PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Current Hypertension Reviews publishes frontier reviews/ mini-reviews, original research articles and guest edited thematic issues on all the latest advances on hypertension and its related areas e.g. nephrology, clinical care, and therapy. The journal’s aim is to publish the highest quality review articles dedicated to clinical research in the field. The journal is essential reading for all clinicians and researchers in the field of hypertension.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信