Artificial intelligence support in MR imaging of incidental renal masses: an early health technology assessment.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
European Radiology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-23 DOI:10.1007/s00330-024-10643-5
Alexander W Marka, Johanna Luitjens, Florian T Gassert, Lisa Steinhelfer, Egon Burian, Johannes Rübenthaler, Vincent Schwarze, Matthias F Froelich, Marcus R Makowski, Felix G Gassert
{"title":"Artificial intelligence support in MR imaging of incidental renal masses: an early health technology assessment.","authors":"Alexander W Marka, Johanna Luitjens, Florian T Gassert, Lisa Steinhelfer, Egon Burian, Johannes Rübenthaler, Vincent Schwarze, Matthias F Froelich, Marcus R Makowski, Felix G Gassert","doi":"10.1007/s00330-024-10643-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study analyzes the potential cost-effectiveness of integrating an artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted system into the differentiation of incidental renal lesions as benign or malignant on MR images during follow-up.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>For estimation of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and lifetime costs, a decision model was created, including the MRI strategy and MRI + AI strategy. Model input parameters were derived from recent literature. Willingness to pay (WTP) was set to $100,000/QALY. Costs of $0 for the AI were assumed in the base-case scenario. Model uncertainty and costs of the AI system were assessed using deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Average total costs were at $8054 for the MRI strategy and $7939 for additional use of an AI-based algorithm. The model yielded a cumulative effectiveness of 8.76 QALYs for the MRI strategy and of 8.77 for the MRI + AI strategy. The economically dominant strategy was MRI + AI. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed high robustness of the model with the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), which represents the incremental cost associated with one additional QALY gained, remaining below the WTP for variation of the input parameters. If increasing costs for the algorithm, the ICER of $0/QALY was exceeded at $115, and the defined WTP was exceeded at $667 for the use of the AI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This analysis, rooted in assumptions, suggests that the additional use of an AI-based algorithm may be a potentially cost-effective alternative in the differentiation of incidental renal lesions using MRI and needs to be confirmed in the future.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance statement: </strong>These results hint at AI's the potential impact on diagnosing renal masses. While the current study urges careful interpretation, ongoing research is essential to confirm and seamlessly integrate AI into clinical practice, ensuring its efficacy in routine diagnostics.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>• This is a model-based study using data from literature where AI has been applied in the diagnostic workup of incidental renal lesions. • MRI + AI has the potential to be a cost-effective alternative in the differentiation of incidental renal lesions. • The additional use of AI can reduce costs in the diagnostic workup of incidental renal lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11364579/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-10643-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study analyzes the potential cost-effectiveness of integrating an artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted system into the differentiation of incidental renal lesions as benign or malignant on MR images during follow-up.

Materials and methods: For estimation of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and lifetime costs, a decision model was created, including the MRI strategy and MRI + AI strategy. Model input parameters were derived from recent literature. Willingness to pay (WTP) was set to $100,000/QALY. Costs of $0 for the AI were assumed in the base-case scenario. Model uncertainty and costs of the AI system were assessed using deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis.

Results: Average total costs were at $8054 for the MRI strategy and $7939 for additional use of an AI-based algorithm. The model yielded a cumulative effectiveness of 8.76 QALYs for the MRI strategy and of 8.77 for the MRI + AI strategy. The economically dominant strategy was MRI + AI. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed high robustness of the model with the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), which represents the incremental cost associated with one additional QALY gained, remaining below the WTP for variation of the input parameters. If increasing costs for the algorithm, the ICER of $0/QALY was exceeded at $115, and the defined WTP was exceeded at $667 for the use of the AI.

Conclusions: This analysis, rooted in assumptions, suggests that the additional use of an AI-based algorithm may be a potentially cost-effective alternative in the differentiation of incidental renal lesions using MRI and needs to be confirmed in the future.

Clinical relevance statement: These results hint at AI's the potential impact on diagnosing renal masses. While the current study urges careful interpretation, ongoing research is essential to confirm and seamlessly integrate AI into clinical practice, ensuring its efficacy in routine diagnostics.

Key points: • This is a model-based study using data from literature where AI has been applied in the diagnostic workup of incidental renal lesions. • MRI + AI has the potential to be a cost-effective alternative in the differentiation of incidental renal lesions. • The additional use of AI can reduce costs in the diagnostic workup of incidental renal lesions.

人工智能对偶发性肾肿块 MR 成像的支持:早期健康技术评估。
目的:本研究分析了在随访期间将人工智能(AI)辅助系统整合到核磁共振图像上区分肾脏偶发病变良性或恶性的潜在成本效益:为估算质量调整生命年(QALYs)和终生成本,建立了一个决策模型,包括 MRI 策略和 MRI + AI 策略。模型输入参数来自近期文献。支付意愿 (WTP) 设定为 100,000 美元/QALY。在基础方案中,假定人工智能的成本为 0 美元。使用确定性和概率敏感性分析评估了模型的不确定性和人工智能系统的成本:核磁共振成像策略的平均总成本为 8054 美元,额外使用人工智能算法的平均总成本为 7939 美元。模型得出核磁共振成像策略的累积有效性为 8.76 QALYs,核磁共振成像+人工智能策略的累积有效性为 8.77 QALYs。经济上占优势的策略是 MRI + AI。确定性和概率敏感性分析表明,该模型具有很高的稳健性,其增量成本效益比(ICER)代表了获得一个额外 QALY 所需的增量成本,在输入参数发生变化时仍低于 WTP。如果增加算法的成本,0 美元/QALY 的 ICER 超过了 115 美元,使用人工智能的 WTP 超过了 667 美元:该分析以假设为基础,表明额外使用基于人工智能的算法可能是使用核磁共振成像分辨偶然肾脏病变的一种具有潜在成本效益的替代方法,需要在未来加以证实:这些结果提示了人工智能对诊断肾脏肿块的潜在影响。尽管目前的研究需要谨慎解读,但持续的研究对于确认人工智能并将其无缝整合到临床实践中至关重要,以确保其在常规诊断中的有效性:- 这是一项基于模型的研究,使用的数据来自将人工智能应用于偶发性肾脏病变诊断工作的文献。- 核磁共振成像+人工智能有可能成为鉴别偶然性肾脏病变的一种经济有效的替代方法。- 额外使用人工智能可降低偶发肾脏病变诊断工作的成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Radiology
European Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
874
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field. This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies. From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信