[Feasibility study of expectant management of different degrees of vaginal fluid in pregnant women with premature rupture of membranes in the second trimester].

Y M Gao, S H Wu, H X Shang, Y L Yang, B H Zhou, X Yang
{"title":"[Feasibility study of expectant management of different degrees of vaginal fluid in pregnant women with premature rupture of membranes in the second trimester].","authors":"Y M Gao, S H Wu, H X Shang, Y L Yang, B H Zhou, X Yang","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20230915-00100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To investigate the feasibility of expectant management of different degrees of vaginal fluid in pregnant women with premature rupture of membranes in the second trimester. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective cohort study was conducted to collect 103 pregnant women who were diagnosed with premature rupture of membranes in the second trimester of pregnancy and insisted on continuing the pregnancy in Shanxi Bethune Hospital from July 2012 to July 2022. According to the degree of vaginal fluid, pregnant women were divided into rupture group (with typical vaginal fluid, 48 cases) and leakage group (without typical vaginal fluid, 55 cases). The rupture latency (the time from rupture of membranes to termination of pregnancy), gestational weeks of termination, indications and methods of termination of pregnancy, maternal infection related indicators and perinatal outcomes were compared between the two groups. Univariate regression model was used to analyze the correlation between different degrees of vaginal fluid in pregnant women with premature rupture of membranes and maternal and neonatal outcomes. <b>Results:</b> (1) Obstetric indicators: there was no significant difference in the gestational age of rupture of membranes between the two groups (<i>P</i>>0.05). However, the proportion of rupture latency >28 days in the leakage group was significantly higher than that in the rupture group [42% (23/55) vs 13% (6/48); <i>χ</i><sup>2</sup><i>=</i>33.673, <i>P</i><0.001], and the incidence of pregnancy termination ≥28 weeks was significantly higher [47% (26/55) vs 19% (9/48); <i>χ</i><sup>2</sup>=9.295, <i>P</i>=0.002]. (2) Indications and methods of termination: the incidence of progressive reduction of amniotic fluid as the indication for termination in the leakage group was significantly lower than that in the rupture group [22% (12/55) vs 42% (20/48); <i>χ</i><sup>2</sup>=4.715, <i>P</i>=0.030], and the incidence of full-term termination in the leakage group was significantly higher than that in the rupture group [31% (17/55) vs 12% (6/48); <i>χ</i><sup>2</sup>=5.008, <i>P</i>=0.025], while there were no significant differences in the indications of termination of pregnancy, including amniotic cavity infection, uterine contraction failure and fetal distress between the two groups (all <i>P</i>>0.05). The incidence of induced labor or spontaneous contraction in the leakage group was significantly lower than that in the rupture group [53% (29/55) vs 81% (39/48); <i>χ</i><sup>2</sup>=9.295, <i>P</i>=0.002], while the cesarean section rate and vaginal delivery rate were similar between the two groups (both <i>P</i>>0.05). (3) Infection related indicators: the incidence of amniotic cavity infection in the leakage group was significantly higher than that in the rupture group [31% (17/55) vs 13% (6/48); <i>χ</i><sup>2</sup>=4.003, <i>P</i>=0.045]. However, there were no significant differences in the elevation of inflammatory indicators, the positive rate of cervical secretion bacterial culture and the incidence of tissue chorioamnionitis between the two groups (all <i>P</i>>0.05). (4) Perinatal outcomes: the live birth rate in the leakage group was significantly higher than that in the rupture group [51% (28/55) vs 27% (13/48); <i>χ</i><sup>2</sup>=5.119, <i>P</i>=0.024]. The proportion of live births with 1-minute Apgar score >7 in the leakage group was significantly higher than that in the rupture group [38% (21/55) vs 17% (8/48); <i>χ</i><sup>2</sup>=4.850, <i>P</i>=0.028]. However, there were no significant differences in the birth weight of live births and the incidence of neonatal complications between the two groups (all <i>P</i>>0.05). (5) Univariate regression analysis showed that compared with the rupture group, the leakage group had a higher risk of pregnancy termination at ≥28 gestational weeks (<i>RR</i>=2.521, 95%<i>CI</i>: 1.314-4.838; <i>P</i>=0.002), amniotic infection (<i>RR</i>=2.473, 95%<i>CI</i>: 1.061-5.764; <i>P</i>=0.025), perinatal survival (<i>RR</i>=1.880, 95%<i>CI</i>: 1.104-3.199; <i>P</i>=0.014). <b>Conclusion:</b> Compared with pregnant women with typical vaginal fluid in the second trimester of premature rupture of membranes, expectant treatment for pregnant women with atypical vaginal fluid is more feasible, which could effectively prolong the gestational weeks and improve the perinatal live birth rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":10050,"journal":{"name":"中华妇产科杂志","volume":"59 2","pages":"121-129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华妇产科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20230915-00100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the feasibility of expectant management of different degrees of vaginal fluid in pregnant women with premature rupture of membranes in the second trimester. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted to collect 103 pregnant women who were diagnosed with premature rupture of membranes in the second trimester of pregnancy and insisted on continuing the pregnancy in Shanxi Bethune Hospital from July 2012 to July 2022. According to the degree of vaginal fluid, pregnant women were divided into rupture group (with typical vaginal fluid, 48 cases) and leakage group (without typical vaginal fluid, 55 cases). The rupture latency (the time from rupture of membranes to termination of pregnancy), gestational weeks of termination, indications and methods of termination of pregnancy, maternal infection related indicators and perinatal outcomes were compared between the two groups. Univariate regression model was used to analyze the correlation between different degrees of vaginal fluid in pregnant women with premature rupture of membranes and maternal and neonatal outcomes. Results: (1) Obstetric indicators: there was no significant difference in the gestational age of rupture of membranes between the two groups (P>0.05). However, the proportion of rupture latency >28 days in the leakage group was significantly higher than that in the rupture group [42% (23/55) vs 13% (6/48); χ2=33.673, P<0.001], and the incidence of pregnancy termination ≥28 weeks was significantly higher [47% (26/55) vs 19% (9/48); χ2=9.295, P=0.002]. (2) Indications and methods of termination: the incidence of progressive reduction of amniotic fluid as the indication for termination in the leakage group was significantly lower than that in the rupture group [22% (12/55) vs 42% (20/48); χ2=4.715, P=0.030], and the incidence of full-term termination in the leakage group was significantly higher than that in the rupture group [31% (17/55) vs 12% (6/48); χ2=5.008, P=0.025], while there were no significant differences in the indications of termination of pregnancy, including amniotic cavity infection, uterine contraction failure and fetal distress between the two groups (all P>0.05). The incidence of induced labor or spontaneous contraction in the leakage group was significantly lower than that in the rupture group [53% (29/55) vs 81% (39/48); χ2=9.295, P=0.002], while the cesarean section rate and vaginal delivery rate were similar between the two groups (both P>0.05). (3) Infection related indicators: the incidence of amniotic cavity infection in the leakage group was significantly higher than that in the rupture group [31% (17/55) vs 13% (6/48); χ2=4.003, P=0.045]. However, there were no significant differences in the elevation of inflammatory indicators, the positive rate of cervical secretion bacterial culture and the incidence of tissue chorioamnionitis between the two groups (all P>0.05). (4) Perinatal outcomes: the live birth rate in the leakage group was significantly higher than that in the rupture group [51% (28/55) vs 27% (13/48); χ2=5.119, P=0.024]. The proportion of live births with 1-minute Apgar score >7 in the leakage group was significantly higher than that in the rupture group [38% (21/55) vs 17% (8/48); χ2=4.850, P=0.028]. However, there were no significant differences in the birth weight of live births and the incidence of neonatal complications between the two groups (all P>0.05). (5) Univariate regression analysis showed that compared with the rupture group, the leakage group had a higher risk of pregnancy termination at ≥28 gestational weeks (RR=2.521, 95%CI: 1.314-4.838; P=0.002), amniotic infection (RR=2.473, 95%CI: 1.061-5.764; P=0.025), perinatal survival (RR=1.880, 95%CI: 1.104-3.199; P=0.014). Conclusion: Compared with pregnant women with typical vaginal fluid in the second trimester of premature rupture of membranes, expectant treatment for pregnant women with atypical vaginal fluid is more feasible, which could effectively prolong the gestational weeks and improve the perinatal live birth rate.

[妊娠后三个月胎膜早破孕妇不同程度阴道积液预期管理的可行性研究]。
目的探究对第二孕期胎膜早破孕妇不同程度阴道积液进行预期管理的可行性。方法:对 103 名胎膜早破孕妇进行回顾性队列研究:通过回顾性队列研究,收集2012年7月-2022年7月在山西白求恩医院确诊为胎膜早破并坚持继续妊娠的103例孕妇。根据阴道积液程度将孕妇分为破膜组(有典型阴道积液,48 例)和漏液组(无典型阴道积液,55 例)。比较了两组孕妇的胎膜破裂潜伏期(从胎膜破裂到终止妊娠的时间)、终止妊娠的孕周、终止妊娠的指征和方法、母体感染相关指标和围产儿结局。采用单变量回归模型分析胎膜早破孕妇不同程度阴道积液与孕产妇及新生儿结局的相关性。结果:(1)产科指标:两组胎膜破裂胎龄差异无学意义(P>0.05)。但漏破组破裂潜伏期>28天的比例明显高于破膜组[42%(23/55)vs 13%(6/48);χ2=33.673,Pχ2=9.295,P=0.002]。(2)终止妊娠的指征与方法:漏胎组以羊水进行性减少作为终止妊娠指征的发生率明显低于破裂组[22%(12/55) vs 42%(20/48);χ2=4.715,P=0.030],漏产组足月终止妊娠的发生率明显高于破裂组[31%(17/55) vs 12%(6/48);χ2=5.008,P=0.025],而两组患者终止妊娠的指征包括羊膜腔感染、子宫收缩乏力、胎儿窘迫等无明显差异(均P>0.05)。漏产组引产或自然宫缩发生率明显低于破裂组[53%(29/55)vs 81%(39/48);χ2=9.295,P=0.002],两组剖宫产率和阴道分娩率相似(均P>0.05)。(3)感染相关指标:漏破组羊膜腔感染发生率明显高于破裂组[31%(17/55)vs 13%(6/48);χ2=4.003,P=0.045]。但两组间炎症指标升高、宫颈分泌物细菌培养阳性率和组织绒毛膜羊膜炎发生率无明显差异(均 P>0.05)。(4)围产期结局:漏吸组的活产率明显高于破裂组[51%(28/55)vs 27%(13/48);χ2=5.119,P=0.024]。漏产组 1 分钟 Apgar 评分大于 7 分的活产婴儿比例明显高于破裂组 [38% (21/55) vs 17% (8/48);χ2=4.850,P=0.028]。然而,两组间活产婴儿的出生体重和新生儿并发症的发生率无明显差异(P>0.05)。(5)单变量回归分析显示,与破裂组相比,漏尿组妊娠周数≥28孕周终止妊娠(RR=2.521,95%CI:1.314-4.838;P=0.002)、羊膜感染(RR=2.473,95%CI:1.061-5.764;P=0.025)、围产儿存活率(RR=1.880,95%CI:1.104-3.199;P=0.014)的风险更高。结论与胎膜早破第二孕期典型阴道积液孕妇相比,非典型阴道积液孕妇的期待治疗更为可行,可有效延长孕周,提高围产儿活产率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12682
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信