Impact of scanning range and image count on the precision of digitally recorded intermaxillary relationships in interocclusal record using intraoral scanner

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Yusuke Koshiishi, Shinpei Tanaka, Yotaro Iwauchi, Kazuyoshi Baba
{"title":"Impact of scanning range and image count on the precision of digitally recorded intermaxillary relationships in interocclusal record using intraoral scanner","authors":"Yusuke Koshiishi, Shinpei Tanaka, Yotaro Iwauchi, Kazuyoshi Baba","doi":"10.2334/josnusd.23-0379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"</p><p><b>Purpose: </b>The effect of scan range and the number of scanned images on the precision of in vivo intermaxillary relationship reproduction was evaluated using digital scans acquired with an intraoral scanner.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> The study involved 15 participants with normal occlusion. Two different interocclusal recording settings were employed using the intraoral scanner (TRIOS 4): 'MIN,' focusing on the minimal scan range of the first molar region, and 'MAX,' including the scan range from the right first premolar to the right second molar. These settings were combined with three different image counts, resulting in six experimental conditions. Interocclusal recordings were performed four times for each condition. Dimensional discrepancies between datasets were analyzed using three-dimensional morphometric software and compared using two-way analysis of variance.</p><p><b>Results:</b> Median dimensional discrepancies (interquartile range; IQR) of 39.2 (30.7-49.4), 42.2 (32.6-49.3), 30.3 (26.8-44.1), 20.1 (16.0-34.8), 21.8 (19.0-25.1), and 26.6 (19.9-34.5) µm were found for MIN/200, MIN/400, MIN/600, MAX/200, MAX/400, and MAX/600, respectively. Significant differences in dimensional discrepancies according to scan range were found. Wilcoxon signed-rank test showed significant differences between MAX and MIN (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.01).</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> Scan range may affect the precision of intermaxillary relationship reproduction. Thus, scanning of the most extensive region practically achievable is recommended.</p>\n<p></p>","PeriodicalId":16646,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.23-0379","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The effect of scan range and the number of scanned images on the precision of in vivo intermaxillary relationship reproduction was evaluated using digital scans acquired with an intraoral scanner.

Methods: The study involved 15 participants with normal occlusion. Two different interocclusal recording settings were employed using the intraoral scanner (TRIOS 4): 'MIN,' focusing on the minimal scan range of the first molar region, and 'MAX,' including the scan range from the right first premolar to the right second molar. These settings were combined with three different image counts, resulting in six experimental conditions. Interocclusal recordings were performed four times for each condition. Dimensional discrepancies between datasets were analyzed using three-dimensional morphometric software and compared using two-way analysis of variance.

Results: Median dimensional discrepancies (interquartile range; IQR) of 39.2 (30.7-49.4), 42.2 (32.6-49.3), 30.3 (26.8-44.1), 20.1 (16.0-34.8), 21.8 (19.0-25.1), and 26.6 (19.9-34.5) µm were found for MIN/200, MIN/400, MIN/600, MAX/200, MAX/400, and MAX/600, respectively. Significant differences in dimensional discrepancies according to scan range were found. Wilcoxon signed-rank test showed significant differences between MAX and MIN (P < 0.01).

Conclusion: Scan range may affect the precision of intermaxillary relationship reproduction. Thus, scanning of the most extensive region practically achievable is recommended.

扫描范围和图像数量对使用口内扫描仪进行咬合间记录的颌间关系数字记录精度的影响
目的:使用口内扫描仪获取的数字扫描图像,评估扫描范围和扫描图像数量对活体颌间关系再现精度的影响:研究涉及 15 名咬合正常的参与者。口内扫描仪(TRIOS 4)采用了两种不同的咬合间记录设置:最小 "侧重于第一臼齿区域的最小扫描范围,"最大 "包括从右第一前臼齿到右第二臼齿的扫描范围。这些设置与三种不同的图像计数相结合,产生了六种实验条件。每种条件进行四次闭合间记录。使用三维形态计量软件分析数据集之间的尺寸差异,并使用双向方差分析进行比较:结果:MIN/200、MIN/400、MIN/600、MAX/200、MAX/400 和 MAX/600 的中位尺寸差异(四分位数间距;IQR)分别为 39.2 (30.7-49.4)、42.2 (32.6-49.3)、30.3 (26.8-44.1)、20.1 (16.0-34.8)、21.8 (19.0-25.1) 和 26.6 (19.9-34.5) µm。扫描范围不同,尺寸差异也有显著差异。Wilcoxon 符号秩检验显示 MAX 和 MIN 之间存在显著差异(P < 0.01):结论:扫描范围可能会影响颌间关系再现的精确度。结论:扫描范围可能会影响颌间关系再现的精度,因此建议扫描实际可达到的最大范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of oral science
Journal of oral science DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信