A Review of Analytic Frameworks for Noticing in Mathematics and Science: Comparing Noticing Frameworks Across Disciplines and over Time

IF 1.9 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Julie M. Amador, Tracy L. Weston
{"title":"A Review of Analytic Frameworks for Noticing in Mathematics and Science: Comparing Noticing Frameworks Across Disciplines and over Time","authors":"Julie M. Amador, Tracy L. Weston","doi":"10.1007/s10763-024-10452-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We review analytic frameworks related to the study of noticing in mathematics and science education for the purpose of suggesting trends in research literature across both disciplines over time. We focus on highly cited articles in both mathematics and science noticing research, along with recent articles in both disciplines. We focus specifically on research articles that include an analytic framework, to understand the state of how data on noticing are analyzed. We conducted an extensive review of literature, intentionally related to population, temporality, methodology, and quality. The purpose was to provide an overview of the field of noticing, based on particular search criteria for articles including an analytic framework. To be considered an analytic framework, the article had to include a framework that could be used to analyze teacher noticing. We found frameworks in science education are frequently adapted from mathematics education and are moving toward pairing noticing with aspects of effective instruction (formative assessment, sense-making, pedagogical content knowledge), whereas the frameworks in mathematics education now consider context and equity, which was not an explicit focus in the initial noticing literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":14267,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-024-10452-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We review analytic frameworks related to the study of noticing in mathematics and science education for the purpose of suggesting trends in research literature across both disciplines over time. We focus on highly cited articles in both mathematics and science noticing research, along with recent articles in both disciplines. We focus specifically on research articles that include an analytic framework, to understand the state of how data on noticing are analyzed. We conducted an extensive review of literature, intentionally related to population, temporality, methodology, and quality. The purpose was to provide an overview of the field of noticing, based on particular search criteria for articles including an analytic framework. To be considered an analytic framework, the article had to include a framework that could be used to analyze teacher noticing. We found frameworks in science education are frequently adapted from mathematics education and are moving toward pairing noticing with aspects of effective instruction (formative assessment, sense-making, pedagogical content knowledge), whereas the frameworks in mathematics education now consider context and equity, which was not an explicit focus in the initial noticing literature.

回顾数学和科学中的注意分析框架:比较不同学科和不同时期的注意框架
我们回顾了与数学和科学教育中的 "注意 "研究相关的分析框架,目的是提出这两个学科的研究文献随时间推移的趋势。我们重点关注数学和科学注意研究中的高引用率文章,以及这两个学科的最新文章。我们特别关注包含分析框架的研究文章,以了解如何分析有关注意的数据。我们进行了广泛的文献综述,有意识地将其与人群、时间性、方法和质量联系起来。这样做的目的是根据特定的搜索标准,对包含分析框架的文章进行搜索,从而提供关于注意领域的概况。要被视为分析框架,文章必须包含一个可用于分析教师注意的框架。我们发现,科学教育领域的框架经常改编自数学教育领域的框架,并逐渐将 "注意 "与有效教学的各个方面(形成性评估、感性认识、教学内容知识)结合起来,而数学教育领域的框架现在考虑到了情境和公平,这在最初的 "注意 "文献中并不是一个明确的重点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: The objective of this journal is to publish original, fully peer-reviewed articles on a variety of topics and research methods in both science and mathematics education. The journal welcomes articles that address common issues in mathematics and science education and cross-curricular dimensions more widely. Specific attention will be paid to manuscripts written by authors whose native language is not English and the editors have made arrangements for support in re-writing where appropriate. Contemporary educators highlight the importance of viewing knowledge as context-oriented and not limited to one domain. This concurs with current curriculum reforms worldwide for interdisciplinary and integrated curricula. Modern educational practice also focuses on the use of new technology in assisting instruction which may be easily implemented into such an integrated curriculum. The journal welcomes studies that explore science and mathematics education from different cultural perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信