{"title":"How are middle- and older-age women employees perceived and treated at work? A review and analysis","authors":"Lucy Ryan, Caroline Gatrell","doi":"10.1111/ijmr.12365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Building on the rich array of literatures that explore women's ageing and employment, we conduct a comprehensive review of research on middle- and older-age women and work (including menopause and post-menopause). In reviewing these studies, we blend our interdisciplinary discussions across several domains. We reflect on the question: <i>How are employed, middle- and older-age women treated in organizations, and what are employers’ perceptions of these workers?</i> Through our analysis, we identify and critique two predominant, conflicting yet inter-related themes. These are, namely, notions of <i>constraint</i> (and women's supposed/perceived reduced competencies as they age) versus ideas of <i>flexibility</i> (foregrounding assumptions that employed women experience fewer limitations as they age). As a theoretical lens for theorizing the <i>constraints</i> theme, we draw upon the concept of abjection, highlighting how employer perceptions of women's health as supposedly diminishing can lead to discriminatory treatment at work. In analysing theoretical assumptions regarding apparently enhanced <i>flexibility</i> among middle- and older-age women, we note how women's differing circumstances and requirements might go unrecognized. We argue the need to deepen theoretical understandings about ideas of flexibility during women's middle and older age. Reflecting on the limitations of both themes, we consider the implications for future research agendas.</p>","PeriodicalId":48326,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Management Reviews","volume":"26 4","pages":"536-555"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijmr.12365","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Management Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijmr.12365","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Building on the rich array of literatures that explore women's ageing and employment, we conduct a comprehensive review of research on middle- and older-age women and work (including menopause and post-menopause). In reviewing these studies, we blend our interdisciplinary discussions across several domains. We reflect on the question: How are employed, middle- and older-age women treated in organizations, and what are employers’ perceptions of these workers? Through our analysis, we identify and critique two predominant, conflicting yet inter-related themes. These are, namely, notions of constraint (and women's supposed/perceived reduced competencies as they age) versus ideas of flexibility (foregrounding assumptions that employed women experience fewer limitations as they age). As a theoretical lens for theorizing the constraints theme, we draw upon the concept of abjection, highlighting how employer perceptions of women's health as supposedly diminishing can lead to discriminatory treatment at work. In analysing theoretical assumptions regarding apparently enhanced flexibility among middle- and older-age women, we note how women's differing circumstances and requirements might go unrecognized. We argue the need to deepen theoretical understandings about ideas of flexibility during women's middle and older age. Reflecting on the limitations of both themes, we consider the implications for future research agendas.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Management Reviews (IJMR) stands as the premier global review journal in Organisation and Management Studies (OMS). Its published papers aim to provide substantial conceptual contributions, acting as a strategic platform for new research directions. IJMR plays a pivotal role in influencing how OMS scholars conceptualize research in their respective fields. The journal's reviews critically assess the state of knowledge in specific fields, appraising the conceptual foundations of competing paradigms to advance current and future research in the area.