Fabricio Rodrigues Lapolli , Pedro da Silva Peixoto , Peter Korn
{"title":"Accuracy and stability analysis of horizontal discretizations used in unstructured grid ocean models","authors":"Fabricio Rodrigues Lapolli , Pedro da Silva Peixoto , Peter Korn","doi":"10.1016/j.ocemod.2024.102335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>One important tool at our disposal to evaluate the robustness of Global Circulation Models (GCMs) is to understand the horizontal discretization of the dynamical core under a shallow water approximation. Here, we evaluate the accuracy and stability of different methods used in, or adequate for, unstructured ocean models considering shallow water models. Our results show that the schemes have different accuracy capabilities, with the A- (NICAM) and B-grid (FeSOM 2.0) schemes providing at least 1st order accuracy in most operators and time integrated variables, while the two C-grid (ICON and MPAS) schemes display more difficulty in adequately approximating the horizontal dynamics. Moreover, the theory of the inertia-gravity wave representation on regular grids can be extended for our unstructured based schemes, where from least to most accurate we have: A-, B, and C-grid, respectively. Considering only C-grid schemes, the MPAS scheme has shown a more accurate representation of inertia-gravity waves than ICON. In terms of stability, we see that both A- and C-grid MPAS scheme display the best stability properties, but the A-grid scheme relies on artificial diffusion, while the C-grid scheme does not. Alongside, the B-grid and C-grid ICON schemes are within the least stable. Finally, in an effort to understand the effects of potential instabilities in ICON, we note that the full 3D model without a filtering term does not destabilize as it is integrated in time. However, spurious oscillations are responsible for decreasing the kinetic energy of the oceanic currents. Furthermore, an additional decrease of the currents’ turbulent kinetic energy is also observed, creating a spurious mixing, which also plays a role in the strength decrease of these oceanic currents.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19457,"journal":{"name":"Ocean Modelling","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1463500324000222/pdfft?md5=9caf7e4ad314a4e6136390bd78ddafc7&pid=1-s2.0-S1463500324000222-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocean Modelling","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1463500324000222","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
One important tool at our disposal to evaluate the robustness of Global Circulation Models (GCMs) is to understand the horizontal discretization of the dynamical core under a shallow water approximation. Here, we evaluate the accuracy and stability of different methods used in, or adequate for, unstructured ocean models considering shallow water models. Our results show that the schemes have different accuracy capabilities, with the A- (NICAM) and B-grid (FeSOM 2.0) schemes providing at least 1st order accuracy in most operators and time integrated variables, while the two C-grid (ICON and MPAS) schemes display more difficulty in adequately approximating the horizontal dynamics. Moreover, the theory of the inertia-gravity wave representation on regular grids can be extended for our unstructured based schemes, where from least to most accurate we have: A-, B, and C-grid, respectively. Considering only C-grid schemes, the MPAS scheme has shown a more accurate representation of inertia-gravity waves than ICON. In terms of stability, we see that both A- and C-grid MPAS scheme display the best stability properties, but the A-grid scheme relies on artificial diffusion, while the C-grid scheme does not. Alongside, the B-grid and C-grid ICON schemes are within the least stable. Finally, in an effort to understand the effects of potential instabilities in ICON, we note that the full 3D model without a filtering term does not destabilize as it is integrated in time. However, spurious oscillations are responsible for decreasing the kinetic energy of the oceanic currents. Furthermore, an additional decrease of the currents’ turbulent kinetic energy is also observed, creating a spurious mixing, which also plays a role in the strength decrease of these oceanic currents.
评估全球环流模式(GCM)稳健性的一个重要工具是了解浅水近似条件下动态核心的水平离散。在此,我们评估了考虑到浅水模型的非结构化海洋模型中使用或适用的不同方法的准确性和稳定性。我们的结果表明,这些方案具有不同的精度能力,A 网格(NICAM)和 B 网格(FeSOM 2.0)方案在大多数算子和时间积分变量方面至少具有一阶精度,而两种 C 网格(ICON 和 MPAS)方案在充分近似水平动力学方面表现出更大的困难。此外,规则网格上的惯性-重力波表示理论可以扩展到我们的非结构化方案,从精度最低到最高,我们有从精确度最低到最高分别为:A 网格、B 网格和 C 网格。仅考虑 C 网格方案,MPAS 方案比 ICON 方案更精确地表示了惯性重力波。在稳定性方面,我们看到 A 网格和 C 网格 MPAS 方案都显示出最佳的稳定性,但 A 网格方案依赖于人工扩散,而 C 网格方案不依赖于人工扩散。同时,B 网格和 C 网格 ICON 方案的稳定性最差。最后,为了了解 ICON 中潜在不稳定性的影响,我们注意到不带滤波项的全三维模型在进行时间积分时不会失稳。然而,虚假振荡导致洋流动能下降。此外,我们还观测到洋流湍流动能的额外降低,从而产生了虚假混合,这也是这些洋流强度降低的原因之一。
期刊介绍:
The main objective of Ocean Modelling is to provide rapid communication between those interested in ocean modelling, whether through direct observation, or through analytical, numerical or laboratory models, and including interactions between physical and biogeochemical or biological phenomena. Because of the intimate links between ocean and atmosphere, involvement of scientists interested in influences of either medium on the other is welcome. The journal has a wide scope and includes ocean-atmosphere interaction in various forms as well as pure ocean results. In addition to primary peer-reviewed papers, the journal provides review papers, preliminary communications, and discussions.