Supportive but Exhausting: A Dual-path Model of Team Interdependence and Member Negative Emotional States

IF 3.7 2区 心理学 Q2 BUSINESS
Dana R. Vashdi, Jingqiu Chen, Qingyue Fan, Peter A. Bamberger
{"title":"Supportive but Exhausting: A Dual-path Model of Team Interdependence and Member Negative Emotional States","authors":"Dana R. Vashdi, Jingqiu Chen, Qingyue Fan, Peter A. Bamberger","doi":"10.1007/s10869-024-09937-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Although the implications of team interdependence for team performance are well established, little is known regarding its consequences on the team members’ emotional states. Drawing from Conservation of Resources (COR) theory, we propose a dual-path model of the impact of team interdependence on two distinct negative emotional states (NES), powerlessness and loneliness. More specifically, we argue that on the one hand, team interdependence can reduce member’s vulnerability to NES by facilitating a gain in support resources (i.e., social support). On the other hand, team interdependence may also increase members’ vulnerability to NES via the depletion of regulatory resources manifesting in the form of emotional exhaustion. Additionally, we propose that team goal orientations moderate these indirect effects. Testing this model using three waves of time-lagged data from a sample of manufacturing workers, we find support for the hypothesized dual pathways, and more specifically evidence of: (a) an indirect protective effect of team interdependence via social support on both powerlessness and loneliness, and (b) an indirect vulnerability effect of team interdependence via emotional exhaustion on both powerlessness and loneliness, particularly among members of teams characterized by a high team performance goal orientation. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business and Psychology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business and Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-024-09937-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although the implications of team interdependence for team performance are well established, little is known regarding its consequences on the team members’ emotional states. Drawing from Conservation of Resources (COR) theory, we propose a dual-path model of the impact of team interdependence on two distinct negative emotional states (NES), powerlessness and loneliness. More specifically, we argue that on the one hand, team interdependence can reduce member’s vulnerability to NES by facilitating a gain in support resources (i.e., social support). On the other hand, team interdependence may also increase members’ vulnerability to NES via the depletion of regulatory resources manifesting in the form of emotional exhaustion. Additionally, we propose that team goal orientations moderate these indirect effects. Testing this model using three waves of time-lagged data from a sample of manufacturing workers, we find support for the hypothesized dual pathways, and more specifically evidence of: (a) an indirect protective effect of team interdependence via social support on both powerlessness and loneliness, and (b) an indirect vulnerability effect of team interdependence via emotional exhaustion on both powerlessness and loneliness, particularly among members of teams characterized by a high team performance goal orientation. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

Abstract Image

支持但令人精疲力竭:团队相互依赖与成员负面情绪状态的双路径模型
尽管团队相互依赖对团队绩效的影响已得到公认,但人们对团队相互依赖对团队成员情绪状态的影响却知之甚少。借鉴资源保护(COR)理论,我们提出了团队相互依赖对两种不同负面情绪状态(NES)--无力感和孤独感--影响的双路径模型。更具体地说,我们认为,一方面,团队相互依赖可以通过促进支持资源(即社会支持)的增加来降低成员对消极情绪状态的脆弱性。另一方面,团队相互依赖也可能通过以情绪衰竭形式表现出来的调节资源耗竭而增加成员对 NES 的脆弱性。此外,我们还提出,团队目标导向可以缓和这些间接影响。我们使用制造业工人样本的三波时滞数据对这一模型进行了测试,发现假设的双重途径得到了支持,更具体地说,有证据表明:(a)团队相互依赖通过社会支持对无力感和孤独感产生了间接的保护作用;(b)团队相互依赖通过情绪耗竭对无力感和孤独感产生了间接的脆弱性作用,尤其是在以高团队绩效目标为导向的团队成员中。本文还讨论了其理论和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business and Psychology (JBP) is an international outlet publishing high quality research designed to advance organizational science and practice. Since its inception in 1986, the journal has published impactful scholarship in Industrial/Organizational Psychology, Organizational Behavior, Human Resources Management, Work Psychology, Occupational Psychology, and Vocational Psychology. Typical subject matters include Team processes and effectiveness Customer service and satisfaction Employee recruitment, selection, and promotion Employee engagement and withdrawal Organizational culture and climate Training, development and coaching Mentoring and socialization Performance management, appraisal and feedback Workplace diversity Leadership Workplace health, stress, and safety Employee attitudes and satisfaction Careers and retirement Organizational communication Technology and work Employee motivation and job design Organizational change and development Employee citizenship and deviance Organizational effectiveness Work-nonwork/work-family Rigorous quantitative, qualitative, field-based, and lab-based empirical studies are welcome. Interdisciplinary scholarship is valued and encouraged. Submitted manuscripts should be well-grounded conceptually and make meaningful contributions to scientific understandingsand/or the advancement of science-based practice. The Journal of Business and Psychology is - A high quality/impactful outlet for organizational science research - A journal dedicated to bridging the science/practice divide - A journal striving to create interdisciplinary connections For details on submitting manuscripts, please read the author guidelines found in the far right menu.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信