Unpacking LGBT+ hate crimes discourse in Italy: between symbolic recognition and claims for sexual citizenship

IF 0.6 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Caterina Peroni, Pietro Demurtas
{"title":"Unpacking LGBT+ hate crimes discourse in Italy: between symbolic recognition and claims for sexual citizenship","authors":"Caterina Peroni, Pietro Demurtas","doi":"10.1108/sc-12-2023-0055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The purpose of this article is to provide a critical account of the hate crime (HC) paradigm by exploring its historical legal definition and the limitations in addressing the multiple and structural discriminations faced by minority groups. Specifically, the article focuses on the case of Italy, where in recent years a fierce debate over a proposed law on HC against LGBT+ and disabled people ended in its rejection due to neoconservative and Catholic opposition.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Drawing on critical socio-criminological literature on HC, the paper analyses the Italian debates and socio-legal context over the past two decades regarding discrimination against LGBT+ groups and its (lack of) criminalization. It also provides a secondary analysis of recent data on violence and discrimination against LGBT+ people, collected by the Fundamental Rights Agency (FRA).</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The analysis of the debate and the data collected shows that the criminal definition of HC is insufficient to capture the wider range of social and cultural violence and discrimination against LGBT+ people. Indeed, data analysis shows the effect of the low level of recognition of rights on the propensity of people to denounce and of social practitioners to recognize, discrimination and violence against LGBT+ people. It is therefore argued that the discussion on HC should move beyond the criminalization of individual violence to be entrenched in a broader reflection over the lack of recognition of sexual citizenship rights which perpetuates the vulnerability of LGBT+ people.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This paper contributes to the international socio-criminological debate on HC. It argues for a comprehensive framework that recognizes the structural nature of discrimination and violence against vulnerable groups by framing discrimination and violence against LGBT+ people as a citizenship right rather than a criminal justice issue.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":43879,"journal":{"name":"Safer Communities","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Safer Communities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sc-12-2023-0055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this article is to provide a critical account of the hate crime (HC) paradigm by exploring its historical legal definition and the limitations in addressing the multiple and structural discriminations faced by minority groups. Specifically, the article focuses on the case of Italy, where in recent years a fierce debate over a proposed law on HC against LGBT+ and disabled people ended in its rejection due to neoconservative and Catholic opposition.

Design/methodology/approach

Drawing on critical socio-criminological literature on HC, the paper analyses the Italian debates and socio-legal context over the past two decades regarding discrimination against LGBT+ groups and its (lack of) criminalization. It also provides a secondary analysis of recent data on violence and discrimination against LGBT+ people, collected by the Fundamental Rights Agency (FRA).

Findings

The analysis of the debate and the data collected shows that the criminal definition of HC is insufficient to capture the wider range of social and cultural violence and discrimination against LGBT+ people. Indeed, data analysis shows the effect of the low level of recognition of rights on the propensity of people to denounce and of social practitioners to recognize, discrimination and violence against LGBT+ people. It is therefore argued that the discussion on HC should move beyond the criminalization of individual violence to be entrenched in a broader reflection over the lack of recognition of sexual citizenship rights which perpetuates the vulnerability of LGBT+ people.

Originality/value

This paper contributes to the international socio-criminological debate on HC. It argues for a comprehensive framework that recognizes the structural nature of discrimination and violence against vulnerable groups by framing discrimination and violence against LGBT+ people as a citizenship right rather than a criminal justice issue.

解读意大利的 LGBT+ 仇恨犯罪言论:象征性承认与性公民权诉求之间的关系
本文旨在通过探讨仇恨犯罪(HC)的历史法律定义及其在解决少数群体面临的多重结构性歧视方面的局限性,对仇恨犯罪范式进行批判性阐述。设计/方法/途径本文借鉴了有关仇恨犯罪的批判性社会犯罪学文献,分析了意大利在过去二十年中有关歧视 LGBT+ 群体及其(缺乏)刑事定罪的辩论和社会法律背景。对辩论和所收集数据的分析表明,"HC "的刑事定义不足以涵盖针对 LGBT+ 群体的更广泛的社会和文化暴力与歧视。事实上,数据分析表明,对权利的承认程度低会影响人们谴责和社会从业者承认对 LGBT+ 的歧视和暴力行为的倾向。因此,本文认为,关于 "性权利 "的讨论不应局限于将个人暴力定为刑事犯罪,而应更广泛地反思性公民权利得不到承认的问题,因为这使 LGBT+ 长期处于弱势地位。它主张建立一个全面的框架,承认针对弱势群体的歧视和暴力的结构性性质,将针对 LGBT+ 的歧视和暴力视为公民权利而非刑事司法问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Safer Communities
Safer Communities CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信