Comparative Study on Lightning Data between the Fengyun-4A Satellite and the National Lightning Monitoring Network in Guizhou, China

IF 1.8 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Ankun Wu , Lujin Cai , Juncheng Guo , Min Ding
{"title":"Comparative Study on Lightning Data between the Fengyun-4A Satellite and the National Lightning Monitoring Network in Guizhou, China","authors":"Ankun Wu ,&nbsp;Lujin Cai ,&nbsp;Juncheng Guo ,&nbsp;Min Ding","doi":"10.1016/j.jastp.2024.106194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Clustered data from the Lightning Mapping Imager (LMI) onboard the Fengyun-4A satellite were compared with lightning strike data from the National Lightning Monitoring Network (NLMN) for the period of 22 June–21 September 2020 over Guizhou Province, China. Spatial and temporal distributions of lightning counts for LMI and NLMN were mostly consistent, although the NMLN detected approximately ten times more lightning per hour than LMI. Influenced by background solar radiation, LMI data exhibited strong diurnal variations in lightning radiance, with significantly higher values during daytime. In contrast, NLMN lightning peak currents showed no similar variations. While no clear relationship was observed between the spatial distributions of LMI lightning density and radiance, a negative correlation was found between NLMN lightning density and peak current. Additionally, the matching rate (MR) for LMI and NLMN data, dependent on spatiotemporal matching criteria, was analyzed. The MR increased sharply with the extension of the temporal interval up to 2 s, then stabilized for longer intervals. In contrast, the MR was strongly influenced by the spatial matching grid cell size. For instance, within a 2-s temporal interval, an MR of 81.1% was estimated for NLMN data within a 27.5-km radius, compared to an MR of 79.8% for LMIG data within a 42.5-km radius. Furthermore, the MR was consistently higher for NLMN compared to LMI. Finally, using Bayes' theorem, we conducted a preliminary assessment of LMI's conditional detection efficiency, employing NLMN lightning data as prior information. The LMI detection efficiency was found to be significantly higher during nighttime than daytime, with values of 50.06% and 100% for daytime and nighttime detections, respectively, within a 2-s temporal interval and a 37.5-km grid cell.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15096,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364682624000221/pdfft?md5=ea283e2ebbe8025505c8917eed6bd56d&pid=1-s2.0-S1364682624000221-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364682624000221","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clustered data from the Lightning Mapping Imager (LMI) onboard the Fengyun-4A satellite were compared with lightning strike data from the National Lightning Monitoring Network (NLMN) for the period of 22 June–21 September 2020 over Guizhou Province, China. Spatial and temporal distributions of lightning counts for LMI and NLMN were mostly consistent, although the NMLN detected approximately ten times more lightning per hour than LMI. Influenced by background solar radiation, LMI data exhibited strong diurnal variations in lightning radiance, with significantly higher values during daytime. In contrast, NLMN lightning peak currents showed no similar variations. While no clear relationship was observed between the spatial distributions of LMI lightning density and radiance, a negative correlation was found between NLMN lightning density and peak current. Additionally, the matching rate (MR) for LMI and NLMN data, dependent on spatiotemporal matching criteria, was analyzed. The MR increased sharply with the extension of the temporal interval up to 2 s, then stabilized for longer intervals. In contrast, the MR was strongly influenced by the spatial matching grid cell size. For instance, within a 2-s temporal interval, an MR of 81.1% was estimated for NLMN data within a 27.5-km radius, compared to an MR of 79.8% for LMIG data within a 42.5-km radius. Furthermore, the MR was consistently higher for NLMN compared to LMI. Finally, using Bayes' theorem, we conducted a preliminary assessment of LMI's conditional detection efficiency, employing NLMN lightning data as prior information. The LMI detection efficiency was found to be significantly higher during nighttime than daytime, with values of 50.06% and 100% for daytime and nighttime detections, respectively, within a 2-s temporal interval and a 37.5-km grid cell.

风云-4A 雷电测绘成像仪与中国贵州国家雷电监测网的雷电探测比较
将风云四号 A 卫星上的闪电测绘成像仪(LMI)提供的集群数据与国家雷电监测网(NLMN)提供的 2020 年 6 月 22 日至 9 月 21 日期间中国贵州省上空的雷击数据进行了比较。尽管国家雷电监测网每小时探测到的闪电数量约为风云四号卫星的十倍,但风云四号卫星和国家雷电监测网的闪电数量的空间和时间分布基本一致。受背景太阳辐射的影响,LMI 数据显示出强烈的闪电辐射率昼夜变化,白天的数值明显更高。相比之下,北大西洋监测网的闪电峰值电流则没有类似的变化。虽然 LMI 闪电密度和辐射度的空间分布之间没有明显的关系,但 NLMN 闪电密度和峰值电流之间存在负相关。此外,还分析了取决于时空匹配标准的 LMI 和 NLMN 数据的匹配率(MR)。随着时间间隔延长至 2 秒,匹配率急剧上升,然后在更长的时间间隔内趋于稳定。相反,MR 受空间匹配网格单元大小的影响很大。例如,在 2 秒的时间间隔内,半径为 27.5 千米的 NLMN 数据的 MR 估计值为 81.1%,而半径为 42.5 千米的 LMIG 数据的 MR 估计值为 79.8%。此外,与 LMI 相比,NLMN 的 MR 一直较高。最后,我们利用贝叶斯定理,将 NLMN 闪电数据作为先验信息,对 LMI 的条件检测效率进行了初步评估。结果发现,在 2 秒时间间隔和 37.5 千米网格单元内,LMI 的探测效率在夜间明显高于白天,白天和夜间的探测效率值分别为 50.06% 和 100%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics
Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.30%
发文量
95
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics (JASTP) is an international journal concerned with the inter-disciplinary science of the Earth''s atmospheric and space environment, especially the highly varied and highly variable physical phenomena that occur in this natural laboratory and the processes that couple them. The journal covers the physical processes operating in the troposphere, stratosphere, mesosphere, thermosphere, ionosphere, magnetosphere, the Sun, interplanetary medium, and heliosphere. Phenomena occurring in other "spheres", solar influences on climate, and supporting laboratory measurements are also considered. The journal deals especially with the coupling between the different regions. Solar flares, coronal mass ejections, and other energetic events on the Sun create interesting and important perturbations in the near-Earth space environment. The physics of such "space weather" is central to the Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics and the journal welcomes papers that lead in the direction of a predictive understanding of the coupled system. Regarding the upper atmosphere, the subjects of aeronomy, geomagnetism and geoelectricity, auroral phenomena, radio wave propagation, and plasma instabilities, are examples within the broad field of solar-terrestrial physics which emphasise the energy exchange between the solar wind, the magnetospheric and ionospheric plasmas, and the neutral gas. In the lower atmosphere, topics covered range from mesoscale to global scale dynamics, to atmospheric electricity, lightning and its effects, and to anthropogenic changes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信