Abbas Gholami , Norollah Kasiri , Amirhossein Khalili-Garakani , Juan Gabriel Segovia-Hernández
{"title":"Enviro-economic investigation of Novel heat-integrated configurations for pressure swing distillation","authors":"Abbas Gholami , Norollah Kasiri , Amirhossein Khalili-Garakani , Juan Gabriel Segovia-Hernández","doi":"10.1016/j.cherd.2024.02.033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Pressure Swing Distillation is a widely adopted solution for the separation of pressure-sensitive azeotropic mixtures in various chemical industries. While this method yields high-purity products, it comes with inherent challenges such as elevated operating costs and energy consumption. However, the temperature differential between the two columns involved presents a compelling opportunity for heat integration. In this study, 18 distinct heat integration scenarios were systematically evaluated using a process simulation software to identify the optimal column configuration for minimizing the Total Annualized Cost. These scenarios span five categories: the Conventional Method, Partial Heat Integration, Full Heat Integration, Internal Heat Integration Distillation Column, and External Heat Integration Distillation Column. The Vapor Recompression Column and Divided Wall Column schemes were applied to each method. Genetic Algorithm served as the optimization tool to determine the best arrangement with TAC as the objective function. Additionally, the environmental impact, assessed through CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, was considered. Results indicate that the most economically and environmentally friendly solution is the I-HIDiC with divided wall columns, incorporating VRC systems in both columns. This approach offers a remarkable 66.5% cost savings and a substantial 96.3% reduction in CO<sub>2</sub> emissions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10019,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Engineering Research & Design","volume":"204 ","pages":"Pages 97-111"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Engineering Research & Design","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263876224001151","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Pressure Swing Distillation is a widely adopted solution for the separation of pressure-sensitive azeotropic mixtures in various chemical industries. While this method yields high-purity products, it comes with inherent challenges such as elevated operating costs and energy consumption. However, the temperature differential between the two columns involved presents a compelling opportunity for heat integration. In this study, 18 distinct heat integration scenarios were systematically evaluated using a process simulation software to identify the optimal column configuration for minimizing the Total Annualized Cost. These scenarios span five categories: the Conventional Method, Partial Heat Integration, Full Heat Integration, Internal Heat Integration Distillation Column, and External Heat Integration Distillation Column. The Vapor Recompression Column and Divided Wall Column schemes were applied to each method. Genetic Algorithm served as the optimization tool to determine the best arrangement with TAC as the objective function. Additionally, the environmental impact, assessed through CO2 emissions, was considered. Results indicate that the most economically and environmentally friendly solution is the I-HIDiC with divided wall columns, incorporating VRC systems in both columns. This approach offers a remarkable 66.5% cost savings and a substantial 96.3% reduction in CO2 emissions.
期刊介绍:
ChERD aims to be the principal international journal for publication of high quality, original papers in chemical engineering.
Papers showing how research results can be used in chemical engineering design, and accounts of experimental or theoretical research work bringing new perspectives to established principles, highlighting unsolved problems or indicating directions for future research, are particularly welcome. Contributions that deal with new developments in plant or processes and that can be given quantitative expression are encouraged. The journal is especially interested in papers that extend the boundaries of traditional chemical engineering.