Psychometric proprieties of the French Version of the Family-Focused Mental Health Practice Questionnaire (FFMHPQ)

IF 1.3 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Geneviève Piché , Aude Villatte , Marianne Fournier-Marceau , Marie-Ève Clément , Marie-Hélène Morin , Darryl Maybery , Andrea Reupert , Stéphane Richard-Devantoy , Catherine Cyr-Villeneuve , Annie Lemieux
{"title":"Psychometric proprieties of the French Version of the Family-Focused Mental Health Practice Questionnaire (FFMHPQ)","authors":"Geneviève Piché ,&nbsp;Aude Villatte ,&nbsp;Marianne Fournier-Marceau ,&nbsp;Marie-Ève Clément ,&nbsp;Marie-Hélène Morin ,&nbsp;Darryl Maybery ,&nbsp;Andrea Reupert ,&nbsp;Stéphane Richard-Devantoy ,&nbsp;Catherine Cyr-Villeneuve ,&nbsp;Annie Lemieux","doi":"10.1016/j.erap.2023.100969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Children living with a mentally ill parent are a vulnerable group in the population, at higher risk of various psychosocial and mental health problems. They are also over-represented in youth mental health and child protective services. Adult mental health services that treat parents have an opportunity to identify and support children in these families.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This study determines the structure and reliability of an adapted French version of the Family-Focused Mental Health Practice Questionnaire (FFMHPQ), that has been validated to assess the use of family-focused practices (FFP) by professionals offering services to adults with mental illnesses.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In total, 512 French-speaking adult mental health workers from all regions of Quebec, Canada, completed the French version of the FFMHPQ. Participants were mostly women (87.1%), with a mean age of 40.3<!--> <!-->years, and an average of 8.70<!--> <!-->years of experience in their current job. The sample included professionals from a variety of disciplines, including social work, nursing, psychology, psycho-education, special education, medicine, and occupational therapy. The FFMHPQ-FR was examined using exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and other psychometric properties.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Exploratory factor analysis revealed 5 factors: family-focused practices; workplace support, professionals’ perceived skills, knowledge and confidence; professionals’ openness to improving their practice, and professionals’ attitudes and beliefs toward FFP. The Cronbach's alphas of the first four factors qualified as high reliability (α<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.85; α<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.87; α<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.89; α<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.82), and the fifth factor indicated moderate reliability (α<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.61). Confirmatory factor analysis showed that all single-factor models presented good fit indices (RMSEA<!--> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->.08, SRMR<!--> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->.08, CFI<!--> <!-->&gt;<!--> <!-->.90 and CMIN/DF<!--> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->3) and loadings. Results of the full five-factor model presented good fit on all indices, except for the CFI.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The findings suggest that the French version of the FFMHPQ is reliable and can be used to estimate the scope of FFP in mental health services, and to inform stakeholders about possible enablers and barriers to FFP among professionals, making it a highly relevant tool for improving professional practices in mental health services.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46883,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Applied Psychology-Revue Europeenne De Psychologie Appliquee","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Review of Applied Psychology-Revue Europeenne De Psychologie Appliquee","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1162908823001032","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Children living with a mentally ill parent are a vulnerable group in the population, at higher risk of various psychosocial and mental health problems. They are also over-represented in youth mental health and child protective services. Adult mental health services that treat parents have an opportunity to identify and support children in these families.

Objectives

This study determines the structure and reliability of an adapted French version of the Family-Focused Mental Health Practice Questionnaire (FFMHPQ), that has been validated to assess the use of family-focused practices (FFP) by professionals offering services to adults with mental illnesses.

Methods

In total, 512 French-speaking adult mental health workers from all regions of Quebec, Canada, completed the French version of the FFMHPQ. Participants were mostly women (87.1%), with a mean age of 40.3 years, and an average of 8.70 years of experience in their current job. The sample included professionals from a variety of disciplines, including social work, nursing, psychology, psycho-education, special education, medicine, and occupational therapy. The FFMHPQ-FR was examined using exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and other psychometric properties.

Results

Exploratory factor analysis revealed 5 factors: family-focused practices; workplace support, professionals’ perceived skills, knowledge and confidence; professionals’ openness to improving their practice, and professionals’ attitudes and beliefs toward FFP. The Cronbach's alphas of the first four factors qualified as high reliability (α = .85; α = .87; α = .89; α = .82), and the fifth factor indicated moderate reliability (α = .61). Confirmatory factor analysis showed that all single-factor models presented good fit indices (RMSEA < .08, SRMR < .08, CFI > .90 and CMIN/DF < 3) and loadings. Results of the full five-factor model presented good fit on all indices, except for the CFI.

Conclusion

The findings suggest that the French version of the FFMHPQ is reliable and can be used to estimate the scope of FFP in mental health services, and to inform stakeholders about possible enablers and barriers to FFP among professionals, making it a highly relevant tool for improving professional practices in mental health services.

以家庭为重点的心理健康实践问卷(FFMHPQ)法文版的心理测量特性
背景与患有精神疾病的父母生活在一起的儿童是人口中的弱势群体,他们面临各种社会心理和精神健康问题的风险较高。他们在青少年心理健康和儿童保护服务中的比例也过高。本研究确定了改编后的法文版 "以家庭为中心的心理健康实践问卷"(FFMHPQ)的结构和可靠性,该问卷已通过验证,可用于评估为成人精神病患者提供服务的专业人员对以家庭为中心的实践(FFP)的使用情况。参与者大多为女性(87.1%),平均年龄为 40.3 岁,平均工作年限为 8.70 年。样本包括来自不同学科的专业人员,包括社会工作、护理、心理学、心理教育、特殊教育、医学和职业治疗。结果探索性因子分析揭示了 5 个因子:以家庭为中心的实践;工作场所支持;专业人员感知到的技能、知识和信心;专业人员对改进实践的开放性;专业人员对家庭护理的态度和信念。前四个因子的克朗巴赫系数(Cronbach's alphas)为高可靠性(α = .85;α = .87;α = .89;α = .82),第五个因子为中等可靠性(α = .61)。确认性因素分析表明,所有单因素模型都具有良好的拟合指数(RMSEA < .08,SRMR < .08,CFI > .90,CMIN/DF < 3)和载荷。结论研究结果表明,法文版的 FFMHPQ 是可靠的,可用于估算心理健康服务中的 FFP 范围,并让利益相关者了解专业人员中实现 FFP 的可能推动因素和障碍,使其成为改善心理健康服务专业实践的重要工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
20.00%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: The aim of the Revue européenne de Psychologie appliquée / European Review of Applied Psychology is to promote high-quality applications of psychology to all areas of specialization, and to foster exchange among researchers and professionals. Its policy is to attract a wide range of contributions, including empirical research, overviews of target issues, case studies, descriptions of instruments for research and diagnosis, and theoretical work related to applied psychology. In all cases, authors will refer to published and verificable facts, whether established in the study being reported or in earlier publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信