The Use of Coagulation Markers to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Therapeutic Protocols.

Naida Omerovic, Tamer Bego, Besim Prnjavorac, Nermina Ziga Smajic, Fahir Becic, Halil Corovic, Selma Skrbo
{"title":"The Use of Coagulation Markers to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Therapeutic Protocols.","authors":"Naida Omerovic, Tamer Bego, Besim Prnjavorac, Nermina Ziga Smajic, Fahir Becic, Halil Corovic, Selma Skrbo","doi":"10.5455/msm.2023.35.270-274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients infected by coronavirus disease (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), display various symptoms and severity of the clinical picture. Thus, the therapy and pathophysiology of this disease are a dilemma for health professionals and scientists.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This paper aims to evaluate the effectiveness of therapeutic protocols (the use of anticoagulants) in the treatment of COVID-19 patients of various severity of the clinical picture by monitoring coagulation markers (PT, INR, aPTT and D-dimer), as well as the impact of the type and number of comorbidities patients had on these markers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 200 patients with a mild (n=76), moderate (n=70) or severe (n=54) clinical picture was included. Coagulation markers [PT (prothrombin time), INR (international normalized ratio), aPTT (activated partial thromboplastin time), D-dimer] were examined on three occasions: twice during hospitalization and once after hospital discharge. Anticoagulants used intrahospital were fraxiparine, rivaroxaban or unfractionated heparin. Posthospital, patients were taking either rivaroxaban or did not use any anticoagulants. For statistical analysis, SPSS 26.0 and Microsoft Excel 2019 were used, with a level of significance of α=0.05. Nonparametric tests (Kruskal-Wallis, Wilcoxon Signed-Rank and Bonferroni) were applied and effect size (ES) was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three anticoagulants used intrahospital caused a significant decrease in PT, INR and D-dimer and a significant increase in aPTT, especially in patients with a severe clinical picture, but the ES was the biggest with fraxiparine, then rivaroxaban, and lastly unfractionated heparin. Posthospital, rivaroxaban caused a significant decrease in PT, INR and D-dimer and a significant increase in aPTT, especially in patients with a severe clinical picture. Hypertension was the most common comorbidity in all patients, as well as in patients with a severe clinical picture. There was a statistically significant impact of the number of comorbidities patients had on D-dimer, and none on PT, INR and aPTT, but the highest number of comorbidities was in patients with a severe clinical picture.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of anticoagulants, especially fraxiparine intrahospital and rivaroxaban posthospital, is justified in most COVID-19 cases as there is a significant correlation between this disease's pathophysiology and the coagulation process. There is also a positive correlation between the severity of the clinical picture and the number of comorbidities patients have.</p>","PeriodicalId":94128,"journal":{"name":"Materia socio-medica","volume":"35 4","pages":"270-274"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10875943/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materia socio-medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/msm.2023.35.270-274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients infected by coronavirus disease (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), display various symptoms and severity of the clinical picture. Thus, the therapy and pathophysiology of this disease are a dilemma for health professionals and scientists.

Objective: This paper aims to evaluate the effectiveness of therapeutic protocols (the use of anticoagulants) in the treatment of COVID-19 patients of various severity of the clinical picture by monitoring coagulation markers (PT, INR, aPTT and D-dimer), as well as the impact of the type and number of comorbidities patients had on these markers.

Methods: A total of 200 patients with a mild (n=76), moderate (n=70) or severe (n=54) clinical picture was included. Coagulation markers [PT (prothrombin time), INR (international normalized ratio), aPTT (activated partial thromboplastin time), D-dimer] were examined on three occasions: twice during hospitalization and once after hospital discharge. Anticoagulants used intrahospital were fraxiparine, rivaroxaban or unfractionated heparin. Posthospital, patients were taking either rivaroxaban or did not use any anticoagulants. For statistical analysis, SPSS 26.0 and Microsoft Excel 2019 were used, with a level of significance of α=0.05. Nonparametric tests (Kruskal-Wallis, Wilcoxon Signed-Rank and Bonferroni) were applied and effect size (ES) was calculated.

Results: Three anticoagulants used intrahospital caused a significant decrease in PT, INR and D-dimer and a significant increase in aPTT, especially in patients with a severe clinical picture, but the ES was the biggest with fraxiparine, then rivaroxaban, and lastly unfractionated heparin. Posthospital, rivaroxaban caused a significant decrease in PT, INR and D-dimer and a significant increase in aPTT, especially in patients with a severe clinical picture. Hypertension was the most common comorbidity in all patients, as well as in patients with a severe clinical picture. There was a statistically significant impact of the number of comorbidities patients had on D-dimer, and none on PT, INR and aPTT, but the highest number of comorbidities was in patients with a severe clinical picture.

Conclusion: The use of anticoagulants, especially fraxiparine intrahospital and rivaroxaban posthospital, is justified in most COVID-19 cases as there is a significant correlation between this disease's pathophysiology and the coagulation process. There is also a positive correlation between the severity of the clinical picture and the number of comorbidities patients have.

使用凝血标志物评估冠状病毒病 (COVID-19) 治疗方案的效果。
背景:由严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒-2(SARS-CoV-2)引起的冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的感染者表现出不同的症状和临床表现的严重程度。因此,这种疾病的治疗和病理生理学是卫生专业人员和科学家面临的一个难题:本文旨在通过监测凝血指标(PT、INR、aPTT 和 D-二聚体),评估治疗方案(使用抗凝剂)对不同临床症状严重程度的 COVID-19 患者的治疗效果,以及患者合并症的类型和数量对这些指标的影响:共纳入 200 名临床症状为轻度(76 人)、中度(70 人)或重度(54 人)的患者。对凝血指标[PT(凝血酶原时间)、INR(国际标准化比值)、aPTT(活化部分凝血活酶时间)、D-二聚体]进行了三次检查:两次在住院期间,一次在出院后。住院期间使用的抗凝药物有氟西帕林、利伐沙班或非丝裂肝素。出院后,患者要么服用利伐沙班,要么不使用任何抗凝药物。统计分析采用 SPSS 26.0 和 Microsoft Excel 2019,显著性水平为 α=0.05。应用非参数检验(Kruskal-Wallis、Wilcoxon Signed-Rank和Bonferroni)并计算效应大小(ES):院内使用的三种抗凝血剂可显著降低 PT、INR 和 D-二聚体,显著升高 aPTT,尤其是在临床症状严重的患者中。入院后,利伐沙班可显著降低 PT、INR 和 D-二聚体,显著升高 aPTT,尤其是在临床症状严重的患者中。高血压是所有患者中最常见的合并症,在临床症状严重的患者中也是如此。在统计学上,患者的合并症数量对 D-二聚体有显著影响,而对 PT、INR 和 aPTT 没有影响,但合并症数量最多的是临床症状严重的患者:结论:在大多数 COVID-19 病例中,使用抗凝剂,尤其是院内使用弗来西帕林和院后使用利伐沙班是合理的,因为这种疾病的病理生理学与凝血过程之间存在显著的相关性。临床症状的严重程度与患者合并症的数量之间也存在正相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信