Factors influencing midwives' conversations about smoking and referral to specialist support: a qualitative study informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework.

IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Nicky Knowles, Megan Elliott, Alice Cline, Helen Poole
{"title":"Factors influencing midwives' conversations about smoking and referral to specialist support: a qualitative study informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework.","authors":"Nicky Knowles, Megan Elliott, Alice Cline, Helen Poole","doi":"10.1177/17579139241231213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to identify factors influencing midwives' conversations about smoking, and referral to specialist smoking cessation services, using an evidence-based theoretical framework.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured, qualitative interviews were undertaken with community midwives employed within one health board region of Wales. Deductive framework analysis was employed by coding data to the domains of the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and then identifying themes within domains and across participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven midwives took part in the study. 13, out of a possible 14 domains, were mapped from the TDF. Key enablers to conversations and referrals include knowledge of the risks of smoking in pregnancy, congruence with the professional identity of a midwife, and the use of carbon monoxide monitors in initiating conversations and referrals. Limited knowledge of the specialist service, confusion about the opt-out pathway, varied skills in communicating and engaging with women, low confidence in ability to influence women's decisions, limited appointment times, and competing priorities were identified as barriers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Midwives recognise the importance of their role within the provision of smoking cessation advice and referral to specialist services. While there are continued time pressures and competing priorities for midwives, enhancing skills and confidence in collaborative, empowering approaches to addressing smoking would further support in optimising the uptake of maternity smoking cessation support. This could also enhance conversations about other public health issues such diet, physical activity, and alcohol use.</p>","PeriodicalId":47256,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in Public Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives in Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17579139241231213","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: The aim of this study was to identify factors influencing midwives' conversations about smoking, and referral to specialist smoking cessation services, using an evidence-based theoretical framework.

Methods: Semi-structured, qualitative interviews were undertaken with community midwives employed within one health board region of Wales. Deductive framework analysis was employed by coding data to the domains of the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and then identifying themes within domains and across participants.

Results: Seven midwives took part in the study. 13, out of a possible 14 domains, were mapped from the TDF. Key enablers to conversations and referrals include knowledge of the risks of smoking in pregnancy, congruence with the professional identity of a midwife, and the use of carbon monoxide monitors in initiating conversations and referrals. Limited knowledge of the specialist service, confusion about the opt-out pathway, varied skills in communicating and engaging with women, low confidence in ability to influence women's decisions, limited appointment times, and competing priorities were identified as barriers.

Conclusion: Midwives recognise the importance of their role within the provision of smoking cessation advice and referral to specialist services. While there are continued time pressures and competing priorities for midwives, enhancing skills and confidence in collaborative, empowering approaches to addressing smoking would further support in optimising the uptake of maternity smoking cessation support. This could also enhance conversations about other public health issues such diet, physical activity, and alcohol use.

助产士关于吸烟和转介到专家支持的谈话的影响因素:一项基于理论领域框架的定性研究。
目的:本研究旨在利用循证理论框架,确定影响助产士有关吸烟的谈话以及转介到专业戒烟服务的因素:对威尔士一个卫生委员会地区的社区助产士进行了半结构化定性访谈。采用演绎框架分析法,根据理论领域框架(TDF)的领域对数据进行编码,然后确定领域内和参与者之间的主题:七名助产士参与了研究。在可能的 14 个领域中,有 13 个是从 TDF 中映射出来的。促进谈话和转诊的关键因素包括对孕期吸烟风险的了解、与助产士职业身份的一致性,以及在启动谈话和转诊时使用一氧化碳监测仪。对专科服务的了解有限、对选择退出途径的困惑、与妇女沟通和接触的技能参差不齐、对影响妇女决定的能力信心不足、预约时间有限以及优先事项相互竞争等都被认为是障碍:助产士认识到她们在提供戒烟建议和转介专科服务中的重要作用。虽然助产士仍面临着时间压力和优先事项的竞争,但如果能提高技能和信心,以合作、授权的方式解决吸烟问题,将有助于优化孕产妇戒烟支持。这也可以加强有关其他公共卫生问题的对话,如饮食、体育锻炼和饮酒。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Perspectives in Public Health
Perspectives in Public Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
1.70%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Perspectives in Public Health is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed journal. It is practice orientated and features current topics and opinions; news and views on current health issues; case studies; book reviews; letters to the Editor; as well as updates on the Society"s work. The journal also commissions articles for themed issues and publishes original peer-reviewed articles. Perspectives in Public Health"s primary aim is to be an invaluable resource for the Society"s members, who are health-promoting professionals from many disciplines, including environmental health, health protection, health and safety, food safety and nutrition, building and engineering, primary care, academia and government.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信