Tyler K Fenstermaker, Svetlana Petruk, Alexander Mazo
{"title":"An emerging paradigm in epigenetic marking: coordination of transcription and replication.","authors":"Tyler K Fenstermaker, Svetlana Petruk, Alexander Mazo","doi":"10.1080/21541264.2024.2316965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>DNA replication and RNA transcription both utilize DNA as a template and therefore need to coordinate their activities. The predominant theory in the field is that in order for the replication fork to proceed, transcription machinery has to be evicted from DNA until replication is complete. If that does not occur, these machineries collide, and these collisions elicit various repair mechanisms which require displacement of one of the enzymes, often RNA polymerase, in order for replication to proceed. This model is also at the heart of the epigenetic bookmarking theory, which implies that displacement of RNA polymerase during replication requires gradual re-building of chromatin structure, which guides recruitment of transcriptional proteins and resumption of transcription. We discuss these theories but also bring to light newer data that suggest that these two processes may not be as detrimental to one another as previously thought. This includes findings suggesting that these processes can occur without fork collapse and that RNA polymerase may only be transiently displaced during DNA replication. We discuss potential mechanisms by which RNA polymerase may be retained at the replication fork and quickly rebind to DNA post-replication. These discoveries are important, not only as new evidence as to how these two processes are able to occur harmoniously but also because they have implications on how transcriptional programs are maintained through DNA replication. To this end, we also discuss the coordination of replication and transcription in light of revising the current epigenetic bookmarking theory of how the active gene status can be transmitted through S phase.</p>","PeriodicalId":47009,"journal":{"name":"Transcription-Austin","volume":" ","pages":"22-37"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11093037/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transcription-Austin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21541264.2024.2316965","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
DNA replication and RNA transcription both utilize DNA as a template and therefore need to coordinate their activities. The predominant theory in the field is that in order for the replication fork to proceed, transcription machinery has to be evicted from DNA until replication is complete. If that does not occur, these machineries collide, and these collisions elicit various repair mechanisms which require displacement of one of the enzymes, often RNA polymerase, in order for replication to proceed. This model is also at the heart of the epigenetic bookmarking theory, which implies that displacement of RNA polymerase during replication requires gradual re-building of chromatin structure, which guides recruitment of transcriptional proteins and resumption of transcription. We discuss these theories but also bring to light newer data that suggest that these two processes may not be as detrimental to one another as previously thought. This includes findings suggesting that these processes can occur without fork collapse and that RNA polymerase may only be transiently displaced during DNA replication. We discuss potential mechanisms by which RNA polymerase may be retained at the replication fork and quickly rebind to DNA post-replication. These discoveries are important, not only as new evidence as to how these two processes are able to occur harmoniously but also because they have implications on how transcriptional programs are maintained through DNA replication. To this end, we also discuss the coordination of replication and transcription in light of revising the current epigenetic bookmarking theory of how the active gene status can be transmitted through S phase.
DNA 复制和 RNA 转录都以 DNA 为模板,因此需要协调它们的活动。该领域的主流理论认为,为了使复制叉继续进行,转录机制必须从 DNA 上驱逐出去,直到复制完成。如果不这样做,这些机器就会发生碰撞,这些碰撞会引发各种修复机制,需要其中一种酶(通常是 RNA 聚合酶)发生位移,复制才能继续进行。这一模型也是表观遗传书签理论的核心,该理论认为在复制过程中 RNA 聚合酶的移位需要逐步重建染色质结构,从而引导转录蛋白的招募和转录的恢复。我们在讨论这些理论的同时,也提出了一些新的数据,这些数据表明这两个过程可能不像以前认为的那样相互不利。这包括一些发现,它们表明这些过程可以在没有分叉崩溃的情况下发生,而且 RNA 聚合酶在 DNA 复制过程中可能只会发生短暂的移位。我们讨论了 RNA 聚合酶可能保留在复制叉上并在复制后迅速与 DNA 重新结合的潜在机制。这些发现非常重要,不仅是这两个过程如何能够和谐进行的新证据,还因为它们对转录程序如何通过 DNA 复制得以维持产生了影响。为此,我们还讨论了复制和转录的协调问题,以修正目前关于活性基因状态如何通过 S 期传递的表观遗传书签理论。