Risk factors and management of iatrogenic colorectal perforation in diagnostic colonoscopy: a single-center cohort study.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Aryoung Kim, Heejung Kim, Eun Ran Kim, Ji Eun Kim, Sung Noh Hong, Dong Kyung Chang, Young-Ho Kim
{"title":"Risk factors and management of iatrogenic colorectal perforation in diagnostic colonoscopy: a single-center cohort study.","authors":"Aryoung Kim, Heejung Kim, Eun Ran Kim, Ji Eun Kim, Sung Noh Hong, Dong Kyung Chang, Young-Ho Kim","doi":"10.1080/00365521.2024.2316766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Diagnostic colonoscopy plays a central role in colorectal cancer screening programs. We analyzed the risk factors for perforation during diagnostic colonoscopy and discussed the treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis of risk factors and treatment outcomes of perforation during 74,426 diagnostic colonoscopies between 2013 and 2018 in a tertiary hospital.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 19 perforations were identified after 74,426 diagnostic colonoscopies or sigmoidoscopies, resulting in a standardized incidence rate of 0.025% or 2.5 per 10,000 colonoscopies. The majority (15 out of 19, 79%) were found at the sigmoid colon and recto-sigmoid junction. Perforation occurred mostly in less than 1000 cases of colonoscopy (16 out of 19, 84%). In particular, the incidence of perforation was higher in more than 200 cases undergoing slightly advanced colonoscopy rather than beginners who had just learned colonoscopy. Old age (≥ 70 years), inpatient setting, low body mass index (BMI), and sedation status were significantly associated with increased risk of perforation. Nine (47%) of the patients underwent operative treatment and ten (53%) were managed non-operatively. Patients who underwent surgery were often diagnosed with delayed or concomitant abdominal pain. Perforations of rectum tended to be successfully treated with endoscopic clipping.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Additional precautions are required to prevent perforation in elderly patients, hospital settings, low BMI, sedated patients, or by a doctor with slight familiarity with endoscopies (but still insufficient experience). Endoscopic treatment should be actively considered if diagnosis is prompt, abdominal pain absent, and especially the rectal perforation is present.</p>","PeriodicalId":21461,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"749-754"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2024.2316766","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Diagnostic colonoscopy plays a central role in colorectal cancer screening programs. We analyzed the risk factors for perforation during diagnostic colonoscopy and discussed the treatment outcomes.

Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of risk factors and treatment outcomes of perforation during 74,426 diagnostic colonoscopies between 2013 and 2018 in a tertiary hospital.

Results: A total of 19 perforations were identified after 74,426 diagnostic colonoscopies or sigmoidoscopies, resulting in a standardized incidence rate of 0.025% or 2.5 per 10,000 colonoscopies. The majority (15 out of 19, 79%) were found at the sigmoid colon and recto-sigmoid junction. Perforation occurred mostly in less than 1000 cases of colonoscopy (16 out of 19, 84%). In particular, the incidence of perforation was higher in more than 200 cases undergoing slightly advanced colonoscopy rather than beginners who had just learned colonoscopy. Old age (≥ 70 years), inpatient setting, low body mass index (BMI), and sedation status were significantly associated with increased risk of perforation. Nine (47%) of the patients underwent operative treatment and ten (53%) were managed non-operatively. Patients who underwent surgery were often diagnosed with delayed or concomitant abdominal pain. Perforations of rectum tended to be successfully treated with endoscopic clipping.

Conclusions: Additional precautions are required to prevent perforation in elderly patients, hospital settings, low BMI, sedated patients, or by a doctor with slight familiarity with endoscopies (but still insufficient experience). Endoscopic treatment should be actively considered if diagnosis is prompt, abdominal pain absent, and especially the rectal perforation is present.

诊断性结肠镜检查中先天性结肠直肠穿孔的风险因素和处理方法:一项单中心队列研究。
背景和目的:诊断性结肠镜检查在结直肠癌筛查项目中发挥着核心作用。我们分析了诊断性结肠镜检查中穿孔的风险因素,并讨论了治疗结果:我们对一家三甲医院 2013 年至 2018 年期间的 74426 例诊断性肠镜检查中穿孔的风险因素和治疗结果进行了回顾性分析:在74426例诊断性结肠镜或乙状结肠镜检查后,共发现19例穿孔,标准化发病率为0.025%,即每10000例结肠镜检查中有2.5例穿孔。大多数(19 例中的 15 例,79%)穿孔发生在乙状结肠和直肠-乙状结肠交界处。穿孔大多发生在不足 1000 例的结肠镜检查中(19 例中有 16 例,占 84%)。特别是在 200 多例接受稍微高级结肠镜检查的病例中,穿孔的发生率要高于刚刚学习结肠镜检查的初学者。高龄(≥ 70 岁)、住院环境、低体重指数(BMI)和镇静状态与穿孔风险增加显著相关。九名患者(47%)接受了手术治疗,十名患者(53%)接受了非手术治疗。接受手术治疗的患者通常是因腹痛延迟或并发腹痛而确诊的。直肠穿孔往往通过内窥镜剪切术成功治疗:在老年患者、医院环境、低体重指数(BMI)、服用镇静剂的患者或对内窥镜略有了解(但经验仍然不足)的医生操作时,需要采取额外的预防措施以防止穿孔。如果诊断及时、无腹痛,尤其是出现直肠穿孔,应积极考虑内镜治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
222
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology is one of the most important journals for international medical research in gastroenterology and hepatology with international contributors, Editorial Board, and distribution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信