When dietary modification turns problematic in patients with esophageal conditions.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurogastroenterology and Motility Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-21 DOI:10.1111/nmo.14772
Madison Simons, Sonia Zavala, Tiffany Taft
{"title":"When dietary modification turns problematic in patients with esophageal conditions.","authors":"Madison Simons, Sonia Zavala, Tiffany Taft","doi":"10.1111/nmo.14772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with chronic illness affecting the esophagus often modify their eating habits to manage symptoms. Although this begins as a protective strategy, anxiety around eating can become problematic, and lead to poor outcomes. We administered a survey to examine the factors associated with problematic eating behaviors in patients who have reflux and difficulty swallowing (esophageal dysphagia).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 277 adult patients aged above 18 diagnosed with achalasia, eosinophilic esophagitis, and gastroesophageal reflux completed an online survey: (1) demographic and disease information; (2) reflux and dysphagia severity (3) eating behaviors, as measured by a study-specific, modified version of the Eating Disorder Questionnaire (EDE-Q) for patients with esophageal conditions; and (4) Food related quality of life (FRQOL). Descriptive statistics, one-way ANOVA, and Pearson's correlations evaluated the sample data and a hierarchical linear regression evaluated predictors of problematic eating behaviors.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Problematic eating behaviors were associated with reflux severity, dysphagia severity, symptom anxiety, and hypervigilance, and negatively associated with FRQOL. While reflux and dysphagia severity predicted greater problematic eating, symptom anxiety explained more of these behaviors. Although hypervigilance and anxiety also predicted poorer FRQOL, problematic eating was the largest predictor.</p><p><strong>Conclusion & inferences: </strong>Problematic eating behaviors are associated with increased symptom severity and symptom anxiety, and diminished FRQoL. Symptom anxiety, rather than symptom severity, appears to be a driving factor in problematic eating behaviors. Interventions aimed at diminishing symptom anxiety may be useful in reducing problematic eating behaviors in patients with gastrointestinal symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":19123,"journal":{"name":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14772","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with chronic illness affecting the esophagus often modify their eating habits to manage symptoms. Although this begins as a protective strategy, anxiety around eating can become problematic, and lead to poor outcomes. We administered a survey to examine the factors associated with problematic eating behaviors in patients who have reflux and difficulty swallowing (esophageal dysphagia).

Methods: In total, 277 adult patients aged above 18 diagnosed with achalasia, eosinophilic esophagitis, and gastroesophageal reflux completed an online survey: (1) demographic and disease information; (2) reflux and dysphagia severity (3) eating behaviors, as measured by a study-specific, modified version of the Eating Disorder Questionnaire (EDE-Q) for patients with esophageal conditions; and (4) Food related quality of life (FRQOL). Descriptive statistics, one-way ANOVA, and Pearson's correlations evaluated the sample data and a hierarchical linear regression evaluated predictors of problematic eating behaviors.

Key results: Problematic eating behaviors were associated with reflux severity, dysphagia severity, symptom anxiety, and hypervigilance, and negatively associated with FRQOL. While reflux and dysphagia severity predicted greater problematic eating, symptom anxiety explained more of these behaviors. Although hypervigilance and anxiety also predicted poorer FRQOL, problematic eating was the largest predictor.

Conclusion & inferences: Problematic eating behaviors are associated with increased symptom severity and symptom anxiety, and diminished FRQoL. Symptom anxiety, rather than symptom severity, appears to be a driving factor in problematic eating behaviors. Interventions aimed at diminishing symptom anxiety may be useful in reducing problematic eating behaviors in patients with gastrointestinal symptoms.

Abstract Image

当食道疾病患者的饮食调整出现问题时。
背景:患有影响食道的慢性疾病的患者通常会改变饮食习惯来控制症状。虽然开始时这是一种保护性策略,但围绕饮食的焦虑可能会成为问题,并导致不良后果。我们进行了一项调查,以研究与有反流和吞咽困难(食道吞咽困难)的患者的不良饮食行为相关的因素:共有 277 名 18 岁以上被诊断为贲门失弛缓症、嗜酸性粒细胞食管炎和胃食管反流的成年患者完成了一项在线调查:(1) 人口统计学和疾病信息;(2) 反流和吞咽困难的严重程度;(3) 饮食行为,采用针对食管疾病患者的研究专用饮食紊乱问卷 (EDE-Q) 的修订版进行测量;以及 (4) 与食物有关的生活质量 (FRQOL)。描述性统计、单因素方差分析和皮尔逊相关性评估了样本数据,分层线性回归评估了问题饮食行为的预测因素:主要结果:问题饮食行为与反流严重程度、吞咽困难严重程度、症状焦虑和过度警觉相关,与 FRQOL 负相关。虽然反流和吞咽困难的严重程度预示着更严重的进食问题,但症状焦虑却能解释更多的进食行为。虽然过度警觉和焦虑也可预测 FRQOL 较差,但问题饮食是最大的预测因素:有问题的进食行为与症状严重性和症状焦虑的增加以及 FRQoL 的降低有关。症状焦虑,而非症状严重程度,似乎是问题饮食行为的驱动因素。旨在减轻症状焦虑的干预措施可能有助于减少胃肠道症状患者的问题性进食行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurogastroenterology and Motility
Neurogastroenterology and Motility 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.60%
发文量
178
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurogastroenterology & Motility (NMO) is the official Journal of the European Society of Neurogastroenterology & Motility (ESNM) and the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society (ANMS). It is edited by James Galligan, Albert Bredenoord, and Stephen Vanner. The editorial and peer review process is independent of the societies affiliated to the journal and publisher: Neither the ANMS, the ESNM or the Publisher have editorial decision-making power. Whenever these are relevant to the content being considered or published, the editors, journal management committee and editorial board declare their interests and affiliations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信