Effects of ipragliflozin on left ventricular diastolic function in patients with type 2 diabetes: A sub-analysis of the PROTECT trial

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
{"title":"Effects of ipragliflozin on left ventricular diastolic function in patients with type 2 diabetes: A sub-analysis of the PROTECT trial","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jjcc.2024.02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>We hypothesized that the beneficial effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors on diastolic function might depend on baseline left ventricular (LV) </span>systolic function.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span><span>To investigate the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on LV diastolic function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), we conducted a post-hoc sub-study of the PROTECT trial, stratifying the data according to </span>LV ejection fraction<span> (LVEF) at baseline. After excluding patients without echocardiographic data at baseline or 24 months into the PROTECT trial, 31 and 38 patients with T2DM from the full analysis dataset of the PROTECT trial who received ipragliflozin or no SGLT2 inhibitor (control), respectively, were included. The primary endpoint was a comparison of the changes in echocardiographic parameters and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels from baseline to 24 months between the two groups stratified according to baseline </span></span>LVEF.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>Differences in diastolic functional parameters (e' and E/e') were noted between the two groups. Among the subgroups defined according to median LVEF values, those with higher LVEF (≥60 %) who received ipragliflozin appeared to have a higher e' and lower E/e' than did those who received the standard of care with no SGLT2 inhibitor, indicating longitudinal improvements between baseline and follow up (</span><em>p</em> = 0.001 and 0.016, respectively).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Ipragliflozin generally improved LV diastolic function in patients with type 2 diabetes, the extent of this improvement might appear to vary with LV systolic function.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15223,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiology","volume":"84 4","pages":"Pages 246-252"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0914508724000200","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

We hypothesized that the beneficial effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors on diastolic function might depend on baseline left ventricular (LV) systolic function.

Methods

To investigate the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on LV diastolic function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), we conducted a post-hoc sub-study of the PROTECT trial, stratifying the data according to LV ejection fraction (LVEF) at baseline. After excluding patients without echocardiographic data at baseline or 24 months into the PROTECT trial, 31 and 38 patients with T2DM from the full analysis dataset of the PROTECT trial who received ipragliflozin or no SGLT2 inhibitor (control), respectively, were included. The primary endpoint was a comparison of the changes in echocardiographic parameters and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels from baseline to 24 months between the two groups stratified according to baseline LVEF.

Results

Differences in diastolic functional parameters (e' and E/e') were noted between the two groups. Among the subgroups defined according to median LVEF values, those with higher LVEF (≥60 %) who received ipragliflozin appeared to have a higher e' and lower E/e' than did those who received the standard of care with no SGLT2 inhibitor, indicating longitudinal improvements between baseline and follow up (p = 0.001 and 0.016, respectively).

Conclusions

Ipragliflozin generally improved LV diastolic function in patients with type 2 diabetes, the extent of this improvement might appear to vary with LV systolic function.

Abstract Image

ipragliflozin对2型糖尿病患者左心室舒张功能的影响:PROTECT 试验的子分析。
背景:我们假设钠-葡萄糖共转运体-2(SGLT2)抑制剂对舒张功能的有益影响可能取决于基线左心室(LV)收缩功能:为了研究 SGLT2 抑制剂对 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)患者左心室舒张功能的影响,我们对 PROTECT 试验进行了一项事后子研究,根据基线左心室射血分数(LVEF)对数据进行了分层。在排除了基线时没有超声心动图数据或在 PROTECT 试验 24 个月后没有超声心动图数据的患者后,从 PROTECT 试验的完整分析数据集中分别纳入了 31 名和 38 名 T2DM 患者,他们分别接受了 ipragliflozin 或未接受 SGLT2 抑制剂(对照组)治疗。主要终点是比较根据基线LVEF分层的两组患者从基线到24个月期间超声心动图参数和N末端前脑钠尿肽水平的变化:结果:两组患者的舒张功能参数(e'和E/e')存在差异。在根据 LVEF 中位值定义的亚组中,接受 ipragliflozin 治疗的 LVEF 较高者(≥60%)的 e'和 E/e' 似乎高于接受不含 SGLT2 抑制剂的标准治疗者,这表明基线和随访之间的纵向改善(p = 0.001 和 0.016,分别为 0.001 和 0.016):结论:Ipragliflozin能普遍改善2型糖尿病患者的左心室舒张功能,但改善程度可能因左心室收缩功能而异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of cardiology
Journal of cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.00%
发文量
202
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The official journal of the Japanese College of Cardiology is an international, English language, peer-reviewed journal publishing the latest findings in cardiovascular medicine. Journal of Cardiology (JC) aims to publish the highest-quality material covering original basic and clinical research on all aspects of cardiovascular disease. Topics covered include ischemic heart disease, cardiomyopathy, valvular heart disease, vascular disease, hypertension, arrhythmia, congenital heart disease, pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment, new diagnostic techniques, and cardiovascular imaging. JC also publishes a selection of review articles, clinical trials, short communications, and important messages and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信