Stress and Coping Among Community-Dwelling Black Older Adults with Depression

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Camryn Dixon BA , Jin Joo MD, MA , Melissa Davey-Rothwell PhD , Namkee Choi PhD , Joseph Gallo MD, MPH , Ryan A. Mace PhD , Alice Xie BA, BS
{"title":"Stress and Coping Among Community-Dwelling Black Older Adults with Depression","authors":"Camryn Dixon BA ,&nbsp;Jin Joo MD, MA ,&nbsp;Melissa Davey-Rothwell PhD ,&nbsp;Namkee Choi PhD ,&nbsp;Joseph Gallo MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Ryan A. Mace PhD ,&nbsp;Alice Xie BA, BS","doi":"10.1016/j.jagp.2024.01.127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>In the U.S., there are disparities between the well-being of Black and white older adults. Black older adults are more likely to develop chronic illnesses such as hypertension, heart disease, and diabetes, which can diminish their quality of life. The prevalence of chronic illness is compounded by the stressors common in aging, such as decreased income, changes in physical function, and the loss of spouses and friends. Psychological well-being contributes to an individual's overall health, along with their environment and quality of life. Despite Black older adults' burden of stressors and increased vulnerability to stress, only a few qualitative studies focus on the well-being or coping of community-dwelling Black older adults in the U.S. This mixed methods study aims to assess stressors older Black adults experience and how they cope.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We used data obtained as part of the Peer Enhanced Depression Care (PEERS) study, a randomized clinical trial testing the effectiveness of a community-based peer support intervention that provided depression care to low-income white older adults and older adults of color in an urban setting. Among 149 participants enrolled in the study, we focused on Black older adults (N=27) who completed the intervention and underwent an hour-long semi-structured interview to assess their experience of the study. We reviewed baseline survey data to describe stressors related to their medical comorbidities, social determinants of health, and the most common coping strategies they endorsed. In addition to baseline surveys, we analyzed their transcripts of semi-structured interviews, using thematic analysis as a framework to guide coding and theme generation. NVivo software was used for the organization of the data.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Participants ranged in age from 54 to 90, with a mean age of 70 (SD= 8.0) years, and 89% were women. Participants had a mean income between 16,000 and 19,999 per year. 67% lived alone, and 33% were widowed. Social determinants of health needs were common; 56% experienced housing, transportation or food insecurity. The mean number of total chronic conditions was 5 (SD=1.7). Black participants in our sample, on average, were highly engaged with religion (M=7.1, SD= 1.28), planning (M= 6.2, SD= 1.6) and acceptance (M= 6.5, SD= 1.25) as coping mechanisms. In our analysis of transcripts, older adults described various stressors in their lives including limited resources, social isolation, family conflicts and grief. We found that many participants described self-reliance and emotional repression as ways in which they manage the stress in their lives.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Participants experienced many stressors in multiple aspects of their lives, ranging from resources to familial relationships, which was captured in the qualitative data. These stressors were compounded by high co-morbidity, resource insecurity, and widowhood. Although quantitative data showed the use of adaptive coping strategies, such as religion, acceptance, and planning, qualitative data showed less adaptive behaviors, such as self-reliance and emotional repression. A mixed methods approach provided a holistic view of coping since qualitative interviews allowed older adults to express experiences constrained by expert-derived survey questions. Additionally, future research should focus on developing interventions to support positive coping mechanisms for Black older adults while also addressing resource insecurities and managing chronic conditions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55534,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1064748124001386","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

In the U.S., there are disparities between the well-being of Black and white older adults. Black older adults are more likely to develop chronic illnesses such as hypertension, heart disease, and diabetes, which can diminish their quality of life. The prevalence of chronic illness is compounded by the stressors common in aging, such as decreased income, changes in physical function, and the loss of spouses and friends. Psychological well-being contributes to an individual's overall health, along with their environment and quality of life. Despite Black older adults' burden of stressors and increased vulnerability to stress, only a few qualitative studies focus on the well-being or coping of community-dwelling Black older adults in the U.S. This mixed methods study aims to assess stressors older Black adults experience and how they cope.

Methods

We used data obtained as part of the Peer Enhanced Depression Care (PEERS) study, a randomized clinical trial testing the effectiveness of a community-based peer support intervention that provided depression care to low-income white older adults and older adults of color in an urban setting. Among 149 participants enrolled in the study, we focused on Black older adults (N=27) who completed the intervention and underwent an hour-long semi-structured interview to assess their experience of the study. We reviewed baseline survey data to describe stressors related to their medical comorbidities, social determinants of health, and the most common coping strategies they endorsed. In addition to baseline surveys, we analyzed their transcripts of semi-structured interviews, using thematic analysis as a framework to guide coding and theme generation. NVivo software was used for the organization of the data.

Results

Participants ranged in age from 54 to 90, with a mean age of 70 (SD= 8.0) years, and 89% were women. Participants had a mean income between 16,000 and 19,999 per year. 67% lived alone, and 33% were widowed. Social determinants of health needs were common; 56% experienced housing, transportation or food insecurity. The mean number of total chronic conditions was 5 (SD=1.7). Black participants in our sample, on average, were highly engaged with religion (M=7.1, SD= 1.28), planning (M= 6.2, SD= 1.6) and acceptance (M= 6.5, SD= 1.25) as coping mechanisms. In our analysis of transcripts, older adults described various stressors in their lives including limited resources, social isolation, family conflicts and grief. We found that many participants described self-reliance and emotional repression as ways in which they manage the stress in their lives.

Conclusions

Participants experienced many stressors in multiple aspects of their lives, ranging from resources to familial relationships, which was captured in the qualitative data. These stressors were compounded by high co-morbidity, resource insecurity, and widowhood. Although quantitative data showed the use of adaptive coping strategies, such as religion, acceptance, and planning, qualitative data showed less adaptive behaviors, such as self-reliance and emotional repression. A mixed methods approach provided a holistic view of coping since qualitative interviews allowed older adults to express experiences constrained by expert-derived survey questions. Additionally, future research should focus on developing interventions to support positive coping mechanisms for Black older adults while also addressing resource insecurities and managing chronic conditions.

居住在社区的患有抑郁症的黑人老年人的压力和应对方法
导言在美国,黑人和白人老年人的福祉存在差距。黑人老年人更容易罹患高血压、心脏病和糖尿病等慢性疾病,这些疾病会降低他们的生活质量。收入减少、身体机能改变、失去配偶和朋友等老龄化过程中常见的压力因素加剧了慢性病的流行。心理健康会影响个人的整体健康,同时也会影响他们所处的环境和生活质量。本混合方法研究旨在评估黑人老年人所经历的压力以及他们如何应对压力。方法我们使用的数据是 "同伴加强抑郁护理(PEERS)"研究的一部分,该研究是一项随机临床试验,旨在测试以社区为基础的同伴支持干预措施的有效性,该干预措施为城市环境中的低收入白人老年人和有色人种老年人提供抑郁护理。在参加该研究的 149 名参与者中,我们重点关注了黑人老年人(27 人),他们完成了干预并接受了一小时的半结构化访谈,以评估他们的研究体验。我们回顾了基线调查数据,以描述与他们的医疗合并症、健康的社会决定因素有关的压力,以及他们认可的最常见的应对策略。除了基线调查,我们还分析了他们的半结构化访谈记录,并使用主题分析作为指导编码和主题生成的框架。结果参与者的年龄从 54 岁到 90 岁不等,平均年龄为 70 岁(SD= 8.0),89% 为女性。参与者的平均年收入在 16,000 到 19,999 之间。67% 的人独居,33% 的人丧偶。健康需求的社会决定因素很常见;56%的人经历过住房、交通或食品不安全问题。慢性病的平均总数为 5 种(SD=1.7)。我们样本中的黑人参与者平均高度参与宗教(M=7.1,SD=1.28)、计划(M=6.2,SD=1.6)和接受(M=6.5,SD=1.25)作为应对机制。在我们对记录誊本的分析中,老年人描述了他们生活中的各种压力,包括资源有限、社会孤立、家庭冲突和悲伤。我们发现,许多参与者将自力更生和情感压抑描述为他们应对生活压力的方式。这些压力因高度共病、资源无保障和丧偶而加剧。虽然定量数据显示了适应性应对策略的使用,如宗教、接受和规划,但定性数据显示了适应性较差的行为,如自力更生和情感压抑。由于定性访谈允许老年人表达受专家调查问题限制的经验,因此混合方法提供了应对的整体视角。此外,未来的研究应侧重于开发干预措施,以支持黑人老年人的积极应对机制,同时解决资源不安全和慢性病管理问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
4.20%
发文量
381
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry is the leading source of information in the rapidly evolving field of geriatric psychiatry. This esteemed journal features peer-reviewed articles covering topics such as the diagnosis and classification of psychiatric disorders in older adults, epidemiological and biological correlates of mental health in the elderly, and psychopharmacology and other somatic treatments. Published twelve times a year, the journal serves as an authoritative resource for professionals in the field.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信