The Border Disease virus (BDV) prevalence and genetic typing in ruminant flocks in Turkey.

IF 0.5 4区 农林科学 Q4 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Semra Okur Gumusova, Ayhan Akman
{"title":"The Border Disease virus (BDV) prevalence and genetic typing in ruminant flocks in Turkey.","authors":"Semra Okur Gumusova, Ayhan Akman","doi":"10.12834/VetIt.2693.17780.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aims to update current data regarding Border Disease in sheep and goats, determine the first prevalence of BDV in cattle and identify its circulated genotype in Turkey. For this purpose, 100 sheep, 20 goats and 193 cattle aborted fetuses sent for diagnosis to Samsun Veterinary Control Institute between 2015 and 2017 were analyzed in terms of pestivirus by Ag‑ELISA, BDV by Real‑Time test (RT‑PCR) and Conventional RT‑PCR test. The rate of pestivirus positive animals was found at 50.26% (97/193) in cattle, 58% (58/100) in sheep and 55% (11/20) in goats by the pestivirus Ag‑ELISA test. Total of 58 Ag‑ELISA positive sheep were tested by Real‑Time RT‑PCR and conventional RT‑PCR tests. End of the tests, one sheep sample (1.72%) was found BDV positive by Real‑Time RT‑PCR test and three sheep (5.17%) and one cattle (1.03%) samples were detected as BDV positive by conventional RT‑PCR test. BDV positivity was not detected in goats in this research. All samples that were found positive by conventional RT‑PCR test and Real‑Time RT‑PCR test were genotyped by phylogenetic sequence analysis, and obtained results showed that BDV‑3 and BDV‑7 genotypes of BDV in sheep and BVDV‑1 genotype in cattle circulated in the investigated area. The sequence analysis results revealed that conventional RT‑PCR and Real‑Time RT‑PCR tests detected genotype BDV‑3, while genotype BDV‑7 was only detected by conventional RT‑PCR test in sheep abortion materials. Additionally, it was found that one bovine specimen was BDV positive by conventional PCR, but the same sample was identified as BVDV‑1 at sequence analysis. The obtained data of this study showed that new probes should be designed using our local strains for BDV diagnosis by Real‑Time RT‑PCR assay, and cattle must be sampled for BDV screening, and PCR tests results should always be confirmed by sequence analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":23550,"journal":{"name":"Veterinaria italiana","volume":"59 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinaria italiana","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12834/VetIt.2693.17780.2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to update current data regarding Border Disease in sheep and goats, determine the first prevalence of BDV in cattle and identify its circulated genotype in Turkey. For this purpose, 100 sheep, 20 goats and 193 cattle aborted fetuses sent for diagnosis to Samsun Veterinary Control Institute between 2015 and 2017 were analyzed in terms of pestivirus by Ag‑ELISA, BDV by Real‑Time test (RT‑PCR) and Conventional RT‑PCR test. The rate of pestivirus positive animals was found at 50.26% (97/193) in cattle, 58% (58/100) in sheep and 55% (11/20) in goats by the pestivirus Ag‑ELISA test. Total of 58 Ag‑ELISA positive sheep were tested by Real‑Time RT‑PCR and conventional RT‑PCR tests. End of the tests, one sheep sample (1.72%) was found BDV positive by Real‑Time RT‑PCR test and three sheep (5.17%) and one cattle (1.03%) samples were detected as BDV positive by conventional RT‑PCR test. BDV positivity was not detected in goats in this research. All samples that were found positive by conventional RT‑PCR test and Real‑Time RT‑PCR test were genotyped by phylogenetic sequence analysis, and obtained results showed that BDV‑3 and BDV‑7 genotypes of BDV in sheep and BVDV‑1 genotype in cattle circulated in the investigated area. The sequence analysis results revealed that conventional RT‑PCR and Real‑Time RT‑PCR tests detected genotype BDV‑3, while genotype BDV‑7 was only detected by conventional RT‑PCR test in sheep abortion materials. Additionally, it was found that one bovine specimen was BDV positive by conventional PCR, but the same sample was identified as BVDV‑1 at sequence analysis. The obtained data of this study showed that new probes should be designed using our local strains for BDV diagnosis by Real‑Time RT‑PCR assay, and cattle must be sampled for BDV screening, and PCR tests results should always be confirmed by sequence analysis.

土耳其反刍动物群中边境病病毒(BDV)的流行和基因分型。
本研究旨在更新目前有关绵羊和山羊边境病的数据,确定牛BDV在土耳其的首次流行情况,并确定其流行基因型。为此,对2015年至2017年期间送往萨姆松兽医控制研究所诊断的100只绵羊、20只山羊和193头牛流产胎儿进行了虫媒病毒Ag-ELISA分析、BDV实时检测(RT-PCR)分析和常规RT-PCR检测分析。通过虫媒病毒Ag-ELISA检测发现,牛的虫媒病毒阳性率为50.26%(97/193),绵羊为58%(58/100),山羊为55%(11/20)。共有 58 只 Ag-ELISA 阳性绵羊接受了实时 RT-PCR 和传统 RT-PCR 检测。检测结果显示,实时 RT-PCR 检测发现一个绵羊样本(1.72%)BDV 阳性,传统 RT-PCR 检测发现三个绵羊样本(5.17%)和一个牛样本(1.03%)BDV 阳性。本研究未在山羊中检测到 BDV 阳性。对所有经传统 RT-PCR 检测和实时 RT-PCR 检测呈阳性的样本进行了系统进化序列分析,结果显示,绵羊的 BDV-3 和 BDV-7 基因型以及牛的 BVDV-1 基因型在调查区域内流行。序列分析结果显示,常规 RT-PCR 和实时 RT-PCR 检测均能检测到 BDV-3 基因型,而 BDV-7 基因型仅在羊流产材料中通过常规 RT-PCR 检测检测到。此外,研究还发现,有一份牛样本经常规 PCR 检测为 BDV 阳性,但经序列分析,同一样本被鉴定为 BVDV-1。本研究获得的数据表明,应利用本地菌株设计新的探针,用于 Real-Time RT-PCR 检测法诊断 BDV,同时必须对牛进行采样筛查 BDV,并通过序列分析确认 PCR 检测结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Veterinaria italiana
Veterinaria italiana VETERINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal was created as the Croce Azzurra in 1950. A quarterly peer-reviewed journal devoted to veterinary public health and other aspects of veterinary science and medicine, Veterinaria Italiana is published by the Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell’Abruzzo e del Molise ‘G. Caporale’ (Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell''Abruzzo e del Molise) in Teramo, Italy. The goal of the journal is to provide an international platform for veterinary public health information from Italy and other countries, particularly those in Eastern Europe and Africa, Asia and South America. Veterinarians and veterinary public health specialists are encouraged to share their knowledge and experience on this platform.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信