Inpatient thrombophilia workup; does hematology consult prevent unnecessary testing?

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Journal of Investigative Medicine Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-08 DOI:10.1177/10815589241235663
Zackary Anderson, Mohammed Ahsan, Carlos Aguirre, Michele Ramirez, Keegan Plowman
{"title":"Inpatient thrombophilia workup; does hematology consult prevent unnecessary testing?","authors":"Zackary Anderson, Mohammed Ahsan, Carlos Aguirre, Michele Ramirez, Keegan Plowman","doi":"10.1177/10815589241235663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hypercoagulable disorders are best described as a group of acquired and hereditary conditions that increase the risk for the development of thrombi within veins or arteries. In the setting of an unprovoked venous thromboembolism, common practice in the inpatient setting has been further investigation via a thrombophilia workup to establish an underlying cause. Current Hematology-Oncology guidelines argue against inpatient workup as the results rarely influence inpatient management. Following American Society of Hematology guidelines (Middledorp), the current study found that only 15% (11/72) of patients met appropriate criteria for thrombophilia testing. There was no relationship between appropriate thrombophilia testing and diagnosis of thrombophilia or initiation of anticoagulation. There was a relationship between appropriate thrombophilia testing and Hematology-Oncology consultation. This demonstrates the need for expert consultation if thrombophilia testing is being considered. The current study provides more evidence that a strong recommendation against inpatient testing should be made as testing does not aid in diagnosis or change management and is an overutilization of healthcare resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":16112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investigative Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"392-395"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Investigative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10815589241235663","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hypercoagulable disorders are best described as a group of acquired and hereditary conditions that increase the risk for the development of thrombi within veins or arteries. In the setting of an unprovoked venous thromboembolism, common practice in the inpatient setting has been further investigation via a thrombophilia workup to establish an underlying cause. Current Hematology-Oncology guidelines argue against inpatient workup as the results rarely influence inpatient management. Following American Society of Hematology guidelines (Middledorp), the current study found that only 15% (11/72) of patients met appropriate criteria for thrombophilia testing. There was no relationship between appropriate thrombophilia testing and diagnosis of thrombophilia or initiation of anticoagulation. There was a relationship between appropriate thrombophilia testing and Hematology-Oncology consultation. This demonstrates the need for expert consultation if thrombophilia testing is being considered. The current study provides more evidence that a strong recommendation against inpatient testing should be made as testing does not aid in diagnosis or change management and is an overutilization of healthcare resources.

快讯:血栓性疾病的住院检查;血液科会诊能否避免不必要的检查?
高凝血症是一组后天和遗传性疾病,会增加静脉或动脉内形成血栓的风险。在发生无诱因 VTE 的情况下,住院病人的通常做法是通过血栓性疾病检查进行进一步调查,以确定潜在病因。目前的血液肿瘤学指南反对住院患者进行检查,因为检查结果很少会影响住院患者的治疗。根据 ASH 指南[Middledorp],本研究发现只有 15%(11/72)的患者符合血栓性疾病检测的适当标准。适当的血栓性疾病检测与血栓性疾病诊断或开始抗凝之间没有关系。适当的血栓性疾病检测与血液肿瘤科会诊之间存在关系。这表明,如果考虑进行血栓性疾病检测,则需要专家会诊。目前的研究提供了更多证据,表明应强烈建议不要进行住院检测,因为检测无助于诊断或改变管理,而且会过度使用医疗资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Investigative Medicine
Journal of Investigative Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
审稿时长
24 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Investigative Medicine (JIM) is the official publication of the American Federation for Medical Research. The journal is peer-reviewed and publishes high-quality original articles and reviews in the areas of basic, clinical, and translational medical research. JIM publishes on all topics and specialty areas that are critical to the conduct of the entire spectrum of biomedical research: from the translation of clinical observations at the bedside, to basic and animal research to clinical research and the implementation of innovative medical care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信