Molecular profiling in bee venom allergy: clinical and therapeutic characterization in a Portuguese cohort.

IF 2.6 Q2 ALLERGY
J Cardoso Lopes, P Botelho Alves, H Pires Pereira, F Cunha, I Farinha, A Maresch, R Cunha, G Loureiro, A Todo-Bom, B Tavares
{"title":"Molecular profiling in bee venom allergy: clinical and therapeutic characterization in a Portuguese cohort.","authors":"J Cardoso Lopes, P Botelho Alves, H Pires Pereira, F Cunha, I Farinha, A Maresch, R Cunha, G Loureiro, A Todo-Bom, B Tavares","doi":"10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Summary: </strong><b>Background.</b> Bee venom allergy (BVA) can trigger local and systemic allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis. Recently, the molecular sensitization profile has gained importance in the reaction's stratification and venom immunotherapy (VIT). <b>Methods.</b> Retrospective analysis of patients with hypersensitivity to BVA, confirmed by specific sIgE to Apis mellifera ≥0.35 kU/L and/or positive skin tests to bee venom commercial extract, evaluated in specialized consultation. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data (including molecular Api m 1, 4, and 10) were analyzed, looking for risk factors associated with the severity of the index reaction and reactions during VIT. <b>Results.</b> 93 patients were included (55.9% male; median age of 46 years), 57.3% with atopic comorbidities, and 23.4% with cardiovascular comorbidities. The median specific IgE to Apis mellifera was 6.7 kU/L (IQR 1.0-20.3) kU/L. Regarding the molecular profile, the median IgE to Api m 1 was 0.5 kU/L (57.5% positive out of all measurements); Api m 4 - 0.01 kU/L (11.9% positive), and Api m 10 - 0.3 kU/L (50.0% positive). No patient was monosensitized to Api m 4. The median age of the most severe sting reaction was 36 (IQR 26-48) years, with a median severity (Müeller scale) of 3 (IQR 2-3). Forty-seven patients (50.5%) underwent VIT, with 35.6% of reactions recorded. Allergic reactions during VIT were recorded in 35.6% of cases. The severity of the index reaction correlated positively with older ages (p=0.040; r=0.249), in contrast to monosensitization to Api m 1, which was an independent predictor of milder reactions (p=0.015). Sensitization to Api m 10 was associated with a higher likelihood of reactions during VIT (p=0.038) but potentially less systemic reactions at re-stings (p=0.097). <b>Conclusions.</b> Molecular sensitization profile appears to be relevant not only to the severity of index reactions but also during VIT. Studies of a large cohort of patients with molecular profiles are essential to validate these results and improve the clinical and therapeutic approach to BVA.</p>","PeriodicalId":11890,"journal":{"name":"European annals of allergy and clinical immunology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European annals of allergy and clinical immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary: Background. Bee venom allergy (BVA) can trigger local and systemic allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis. Recently, the molecular sensitization profile has gained importance in the reaction's stratification and venom immunotherapy (VIT). Methods. Retrospective analysis of patients with hypersensitivity to BVA, confirmed by specific sIgE to Apis mellifera ≥0.35 kU/L and/or positive skin tests to bee venom commercial extract, evaluated in specialized consultation. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data (including molecular Api m 1, 4, and 10) were analyzed, looking for risk factors associated with the severity of the index reaction and reactions during VIT. Results. 93 patients were included (55.9% male; median age of 46 years), 57.3% with atopic comorbidities, and 23.4% with cardiovascular comorbidities. The median specific IgE to Apis mellifera was 6.7 kU/L (IQR 1.0-20.3) kU/L. Regarding the molecular profile, the median IgE to Api m 1 was 0.5 kU/L (57.5% positive out of all measurements); Api m 4 - 0.01 kU/L (11.9% positive), and Api m 10 - 0.3 kU/L (50.0% positive). No patient was monosensitized to Api m 4. The median age of the most severe sting reaction was 36 (IQR 26-48) years, with a median severity (Müeller scale) of 3 (IQR 2-3). Forty-seven patients (50.5%) underwent VIT, with 35.6% of reactions recorded. Allergic reactions during VIT were recorded in 35.6% of cases. The severity of the index reaction correlated positively with older ages (p=0.040; r=0.249), in contrast to monosensitization to Api m 1, which was an independent predictor of milder reactions (p=0.015). Sensitization to Api m 10 was associated with a higher likelihood of reactions during VIT (p=0.038) but potentially less systemic reactions at re-stings (p=0.097). Conclusions. Molecular sensitization profile appears to be relevant not only to the severity of index reactions but also during VIT. Studies of a large cohort of patients with molecular profiles are essential to validate these results and improve the clinical and therapeutic approach to BVA.

蜂毒过敏的分子图谱分析:葡萄牙队列中的临床和治疗特征。
摘要:背景。蜂毒过敏(BVA)可引发局部和全身性过敏反应,包括过敏性休克。最近,分子致敏谱在反应分层和毒液免疫疗法(VIT)中变得越来越重要。方法。对经蜂毒特异性sIgE≥0.35 kU/L和/或蜂毒商业提取物皮肤试验阳性证实的蜂毒过敏症患者进行回顾性分析,并在专科门诊中进行评估。对人口统计学、临床和实验室数据(包括分子 Api m 1、4 和 10)进行了分析,寻找与指数反应和 VIT 期间反应严重程度相关的风险因素。结果共纳入 93 名患者(55.9% 为男性,中位年龄为 46 岁),其中 57.3% 患有特应性合并症,23.4% 患有心血管合并症。蜂特异性 IgE 中位数为 6.7 kU/L(IQR 1.0-20.3) kU/L。在分子谱方面,Api m 1 的 IgE 中位数为 0.5 kU/L(在所有测量结果中,57.5% 呈阳性);Api m 4 - 0.01 kU/L(11.9% 呈阳性);Api m 10 - 0.3 kU/L(50.0% 呈阳性)。没有患者对 Api m 4 单敏。最严重蜇伤反应的中位年龄为 36(IQR 26-48)岁,中位严重程度(Müeller 评分)为 3(IQR 2-3)。47 名患者(50.5%)接受了 VIT,其中 35.6% 的反应记录在案。35.6% 的病例在 VIT 期间出现过敏反应。指数反应的严重程度与年龄呈正相关(p=0.040;r=0.249),而对 Api m 1 单敏则是预测较轻反应的独立因素(p=0.015)。对 Api m 10 过敏与在 VIT 期间发生反应的可能性较高(p=0.038)有关,但在再次注射时发生全身反应的可能性较小(p=0.097)。结论。分子致敏特征似乎不仅与指数反应的严重程度有关,还与 VIT 期间有关。要验证这些结果并改进 BVA 的临床和治疗方法,必须对具有分子特征的大量患者进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
102
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信