The Roots of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: What Are the Evolutionary and Neural Bases of Human Mathematics and Technology?

IF 2.1 4区 心理学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Brain Behavior and Evolution Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-17 DOI:10.1159/000537908
Bernard J Crespi
{"title":"The Roots of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: What Are the Evolutionary and Neural Bases of Human Mathematics and Technology?","authors":"Bernard J Crespi","doi":"10.1159/000537908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Neural exaptations represent descent via transitions to novel neural functions. A primary transition in human cognitive and neural evolution was from a predominantly socially oriented primate brain to a brain that also instantiates and subserves science, technology, and engineering, all of which depend on mathematics. Upon what neural substrates and upon what evolved cognitive mechanisms did human capacities for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM), and especially its mathematical underpinnings, emerge? Previous theory focuses on roles for tools, language, and arithmetic in the cognitive origins of STEM, but none of these factors appears sufficient to support the transition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this article, I describe and evaluate a novel hypothesis for the neural origins and substrates of STEM-based cognition: that they are based in human kinship systems and human maximizing of inclusive fitness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The main evidence for this hypothesis is threefold. First, as demonstrated by anthropologists, human kinship systems exhibit complex mathematical and geometrical structures that function under sets of explicit rules, and such systems and rules pervade and organize all human cultures. Second, human kinship underlies the core algebraic mechanism of evolution, maximization of inclusive fitness, quantified as personal reproduction plus the sum of all effects on reproduction of others, each multiplied by their coefficient of relatedness to self. This is the only \"natural\" equation expected to be represented in the human brain. Third, functional imaging studies show that kinship-related cognition activates frontal-parietal regions that are also activated in STEM-related tasks. In turn, the decision-making that integrates kinship levels with costs and benefits from alternative behaviors has recently been shown to recruit the lateral septum, a hub region that combines internal (from the prefrontal cortex, amygdala, and other regions) and external information relevant to social behavior, using a dedicated subsystem of neurons specific to kinship.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Taken together, these lines of evidence suggest that kinship systems and kin-associated behaviors may represent exaptations for the origin of human STEM.</p>","PeriodicalId":56328,"journal":{"name":"Brain Behavior and Evolution","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Behavior and Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000537908","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Neural exaptations represent descent via transitions to novel neural functions. A primary transition in human cognitive and neural evolution was from a predominantly socially oriented primate brain to a brain that also instantiates and subserves science, technology, and engineering, all of which depend on mathematics. Upon what neural substrates and upon what evolved cognitive mechanisms did human capacities for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM), and especially its mathematical underpinnings, emerge? Previous theory focuses on roles for tools, language, and arithmetic in the cognitive origins of STEM, but none of these factors appears sufficient to support the transition.

Methods: In this article, I describe and evaluate a novel hypothesis for the neural origins and substrates of STEM-based cognition: that they are based in human kinship systems and human maximizing of inclusive fitness.

Results: The main evidence for this hypothesis is threefold. First, as demonstrated by anthropologists, human kinship systems exhibit complex mathematical and geometrical structures that function under sets of explicit rules, and such systems and rules pervade and organize all human cultures. Second, human kinship underlies the core algebraic mechanism of evolution, maximization of inclusive fitness, quantified as personal reproduction plus the sum of all effects on reproduction of others, each multiplied by their coefficient of relatedness to self. This is the only "natural" equation expected to be represented in the human brain. Third, functional imaging studies show that kinship-related cognition activates frontal-parietal regions that are also activated in STEM-related tasks. In turn, the decision-making that integrates kinship levels with costs and benefits from alternative behaviors has recently been shown to recruit the lateral septum, a hub region that combines internal (from the prefrontal cortex, amygdala, and other regions) and external information relevant to social behavior, using a dedicated subsystem of neurons specific to kinship.

Conclusions: Taken together, these lines of evidence suggest that kinship systems and kin-associated behaviors may represent exaptations for the origin of human STEM.

STEM 的根源:人类数学和技术的进化和神经基础是什么?
导言 神经外适应代表着通过过渡到新的神经功能的后裔。人类认知和神经进化的一个主要过渡就是从以社会为导向的灵长类大脑转变为同时具有并服务于科学、技术和工程(所有这些都依赖于数学)的大脑。人类的科学、技术和工程能力,尤其是其数学基础,是基于什么样的神经基质和进化的认知机制而产生的?以往的理论侧重于工具、语言和算术在 STEM 认知起源中的作用,但这些因素似乎都不足以支持这一转变。方法 在这篇文章中,我描述并评估了一个关于基于 STEM 认知的神经起源和基质的新假说:它们基于人类的亲属系统和人类最大化的包容性适应。结果 这一假设的主要证据有三个方面。首先,正如人类学家所证明的那样,人类亲缘系统呈现出复杂的数学和几何结构,这些结构在一系列明确的规则下运作,而且这些系统和规则渗透并组织着所有人类文化。其次,人类亲缘关系是进化的核心代数机制的基础,即最大化包容性适应性,量化为个人繁衍加上对他人繁衍的所有影响的总和,每个人乘以他们与自己的亲缘系数。这是唯一有望在人类大脑中体现的 "自然 "等式。第三,功能成像研究表明,与亲属关系相关的认知会激活额叶-顶叶区域,而这些区域在与 STEM 相关的任务中也会被激活。反过来,最近的研究表明,将亲属关系水平与替代行为的成本和收益结合起来的决策过程也需要外侧隔膜的参与。外侧隔膜是一个枢纽区域,它将与社会行为相关的内部信息(来自前额叶皮层、杏仁核和其他区域)和外部信息结合起来,并使用一个专门的亲属关系神经元子系统。结论 综上所述,这些证据表明,亲缘系统和与亲缘相关的行为可能是人类 STEM 起源的外来适应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain Behavior and Evolution
Brain Behavior and Evolution 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
23.50%
发文量
31
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Brain, Behavior and Evolution'' is a journal with a loyal following, high standards, and a unique profile as the main outlet for the continuing scientific discourse on nervous system evolution. The journal publishes comparative neurobiological studies that focus on nervous system structure, function, or development in vertebrates as well as invertebrates. Approaches range from the molecular over the anatomical and physiological to the behavioral. Despite this diversity, most papers published in ''Brain, Behavior and Evolution'' include an evolutionary angle, at least in the discussion, and focus on neural mechanisms or phenomena. Some purely behavioral research may be within the journal’s scope, but the suitability of such manuscripts will be assessed on a case-by-case basis. The journal also publishes review articles that provide critical overviews of current topics in evolutionary neurobiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信