Occupational exposure to endotoxins and small cell lung cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

IF 6.4 2区 医学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Nerea Mourino, Leonor Varela-Lema, Alberto Ruano-Ravina, Cristina Peiteado, Cristina Candal-Pedreira, Julia Rey-Brandariz, Eliana Torres-Cadavid, Guadalupe García, Mónica Pérez-Ríos
{"title":"Occupational exposure to endotoxins and small cell lung cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis.","authors":"Nerea Mourino, Leonor Varela-Lema, Alberto Ruano-Ravina, Cristina Peiteado, Cristina Candal-Pedreira, Julia Rey-Brandariz, Eliana Torres-Cadavid, Guadalupe García, Mónica Pérez-Ríos","doi":"10.1080/10937404.2024.2316151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The relationship of occupational exposure to endotoxins with different histologic subtypes of lung cancer has not been established. Our objective was to conduct a systematic review with meta-analysis to assess the effect of exposure to endotoxins on the development of small cell lung cancer (SCLC). A bibliographic search was conducted using MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and Web of Science databases until December 2022, including all cohort and/or case-control studies that examined occupational exposure to endotoxins and SCLC. Risk of bias was assessed using the U.S. Office of Health Assessment and Translation tool. A random effects model was applied, publication bias were assessed, and a sensitivity analysis was conducted. Four papers were selected for meta-analysis purposes. A total of 144 incident cases of SCLC and 897 population or hospital controls were included. Occupational exposure to endotoxins was considered for textile/leather industry and agricultural sector workers exposed to endotoxins originating from wool, cotton, or leather dust. Except for one study, all investigations were classified as having a low probability of risk of biases. The results of the meta-analysis were not statistically significant (pooled OR: 0.86; 95% CI:0.69-1.08). In addition, neither between-study heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup>=0%;p=0.92) nor publication bias was observed (p=0.49). The results of the sensitivity analysis, after including five studies that assessed the risk of SCLC among textile industry and crop/livestock farm workers (not specifically exposed to endotoxins), showed a negative statistically non-significant association and low between-study heterogeneity (pooled OR: 0.90; 95% CI:0.79-1.02; I<sup>2</sup>=22%;p=0.23). Subjects exposed to occupational exposure to endotoxins seem to exhibit a negative association with the development of SCLC, although the results are not conclusive.</p>","PeriodicalId":49971,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health-Part B-Critical Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"91-105"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health-Part B-Critical Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10937404.2024.2316151","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relationship of occupational exposure to endotoxins with different histologic subtypes of lung cancer has not been established. Our objective was to conduct a systematic review with meta-analysis to assess the effect of exposure to endotoxins on the development of small cell lung cancer (SCLC). A bibliographic search was conducted using MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and Web of Science databases until December 2022, including all cohort and/or case-control studies that examined occupational exposure to endotoxins and SCLC. Risk of bias was assessed using the U.S. Office of Health Assessment and Translation tool. A random effects model was applied, publication bias were assessed, and a sensitivity analysis was conducted. Four papers were selected for meta-analysis purposes. A total of 144 incident cases of SCLC and 897 population or hospital controls were included. Occupational exposure to endotoxins was considered for textile/leather industry and agricultural sector workers exposed to endotoxins originating from wool, cotton, or leather dust. Except for one study, all investigations were classified as having a low probability of risk of biases. The results of the meta-analysis were not statistically significant (pooled OR: 0.86; 95% CI:0.69-1.08). In addition, neither between-study heterogeneity (I2=0%;p=0.92) nor publication bias was observed (p=0.49). The results of the sensitivity analysis, after including five studies that assessed the risk of SCLC among textile industry and crop/livestock farm workers (not specifically exposed to endotoxins), showed a negative statistically non-significant association and low between-study heterogeneity (pooled OR: 0.90; 95% CI:0.79-1.02; I2=22%;p=0.23). Subjects exposed to occupational exposure to endotoxins seem to exhibit a negative association with the development of SCLC, although the results are not conclusive.

职业性接触内毒素与小细胞肺癌:系统回顾与荟萃分析。
职业性接触内毒素与不同组织学亚型肺癌之间的关系尚未确定。我们的目的是通过荟萃分析进行系统综述,评估接触内毒素对小细胞肺癌(SCLC)发病的影响。我们使用MEDLINE、Embase、CENTRAL和Web of Science数据库进行了文献检索,包括所有研究职业暴露于内毒素和小细胞肺癌的队列研究和/或病例对照研究,直至2022年12月。采用美国健康评估与转化办公室的工具对偏倚风险进行了评估。采用随机效应模型,评估了发表偏倚,并进行了敏感性分析。最后选择了四篇论文进行荟萃分析。共纳入了 144 例 SCLC 发病病例和 897 例人群或医院对照病例。考虑了纺织/皮革业和农业部门工人接触羊毛、棉花或皮革粉尘内毒素的情况。除一项研究外,所有调查均被归类为偏差风险概率较低。荟萃分析的结果没有统计学意义(汇总 OR:0.86;95% CI:0.69-1.08)。此外,既未观察到研究间异质性(I2=0%;P=0.92),也未观察到发表偏倚(P=0.49)。敏感性分析包括了五项评估纺织业和作物/畜牧业工人(并非专门暴露于内毒素)罹患SCLC风险的研究,结果显示两者之间存在统计学意义上不显著的负相关,且研究间异质性较低(汇总OR:0.90;95% CI:0.79-1.02;I2=22%;p=0.23)。职业性接触内毒素的受试者似乎与鳞状细胞癌的发病呈负相关,但结果尚不确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
6.90%
发文量
13
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: "Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health: Part B - Critical Reviews" is an academic journal published by Taylor & Francis, focusing on the critical examination of research in the areas of environmental exposure and population health. With an ISSN identifier of 1093-7404, this journal has established itself as a significant source of scholarly content in the field of toxicology and environmental health. Since its inception, the journal has published over 424 articles that have garnered 35,097 citations, reflecting its impact and relevance in the scientific community. Known for its comprehensive reviews, the journal also goes by the names "Critical Reviews" and "Journal of Toxicology & Environmental Health, Part B, Critical Reviews." The journal's mission is to provide a platform for in-depth analysis and critical discussion of the latest findings in toxicology, environmental health, and related disciplines. By doing so, it contributes to the advancement of knowledge and understanding of the complex interactions between environmental factors and human health, aiding in the development of strategies to protect and improve public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信