[Sacral magnetic stimulation in overactive bladder syndrome: comparative analysis of protocols with a frequency of 1 and 5 Hz].

Q4 Medicine
I V Borodulina, G V Kovalev, I A Labetov, O V Volkova, D D Shkarupa, N G Badalov
{"title":"[Sacral magnetic stimulation in overactive bladder syndrome: comparative analysis of protocols with a frequency of 1 and 5 Hz].","authors":"I V Borodulina, G V Kovalev, I A Labetov, O V Volkova, D D Shkarupa, N G Badalov","doi":"10.17116/kurort202410101122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Peripheral magnetic stimulation (pMS) has shown its effectiveness in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms, such as symptoms of an overactive bladder (OAB). The perineal region (pelvic floor) and the sacral roots area (projection S3 of the root) are used as the locus of stimulation. The published literature presents protocols with different parameters of stimulation, while each of them reliably demonstrates clinical efficacy, however, no comparative studies have been found to select priority stimulation modes when analyzing available sources.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the efficacy and safety of different frequency - 1 and 5 Hz - modes of sacral MS in patients with symptoms of OAB.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A single blind prospective randomized comparative clinical study included 59 patients with OAB symptoms. The patients were divided by simple randomization into the group 1 (<i>n</i>=30), which received MS 3 times a week for 5 weeks with a frequency of 1 Hz per sacral root area (S2-S4), and the group 2 (<i>n</i>=29), in which stimulation was performed at a frequency of 5 Hz, while the remaining parameters and duration of therapy were identical to group 1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sacral pMS with different frequency modes (1 and 5 Hz) is reliably equally effective against the clinical symptoms of OAB, which is confirmed by the absence of significant intergroup differences. In patients receiving MS with a frequency of 5 Hz, there was a more pronounced increase in maximum cystometric capacity, normalization of the maximum and average urine flow velocity and regression of the residual urine volume (<i>p</i><0.001, <i>p</i>=0.007, <i>p</i>=0.011 and <i>p</i>=0.012 compared with group 1). The greatest difference in indicators was observed in the increase in the maximum cystometric capacity - +31±25 ml at MS with a frequency of 1 Hz and +109±96 ml at MS with a frequency of 5 Hz (<i>p</i><0.001). MS is a safe procedure and is well tolerated by patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>pMS when exposed to the area of S2-S4 roots for 20 minutes 3 times a week with a course for 5 weeks is reliably effective against the clinical symptoms of OAB at different frequency modes (1 and 5 Hz). At the same time, MS with a frequency of 5 Hz may have an advantage over stimulation of 1 Hz in terms of its effect on urodynamic parameters (maximum cystometric capacity, peak and average urine flow velocity and residual urine volume), which may be associated with a large inhibitory effect on detrusor.</p>","PeriodicalId":39492,"journal":{"name":"Voprosy kurortologii, fizioterapii, i lechebnoi fizicheskoi kultury","volume":"101 1","pages":"22-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Voprosy kurortologii, fizioterapii, i lechebnoi fizicheskoi kultury","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17116/kurort202410101122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Peripheral magnetic stimulation (pMS) has shown its effectiveness in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms, such as symptoms of an overactive bladder (OAB). The perineal region (pelvic floor) and the sacral roots area (projection S3 of the root) are used as the locus of stimulation. The published literature presents protocols with different parameters of stimulation, while each of them reliably demonstrates clinical efficacy, however, no comparative studies have been found to select priority stimulation modes when analyzing available sources.

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of different frequency - 1 and 5 Hz - modes of sacral MS in patients with symptoms of OAB.

Material and methods: A single blind prospective randomized comparative clinical study included 59 patients with OAB symptoms. The patients were divided by simple randomization into the group 1 (n=30), which received MS 3 times a week for 5 weeks with a frequency of 1 Hz per sacral root area (S2-S4), and the group 2 (n=29), in which stimulation was performed at a frequency of 5 Hz, while the remaining parameters and duration of therapy were identical to group 1.

Results: Sacral pMS with different frequency modes (1 and 5 Hz) is reliably equally effective against the clinical symptoms of OAB, which is confirmed by the absence of significant intergroup differences. In patients receiving MS with a frequency of 5 Hz, there was a more pronounced increase in maximum cystometric capacity, normalization of the maximum and average urine flow velocity and regression of the residual urine volume (p<0.001, p=0.007, p=0.011 and p=0.012 compared with group 1). The greatest difference in indicators was observed in the increase in the maximum cystometric capacity - +31±25 ml at MS with a frequency of 1 Hz and +109±96 ml at MS with a frequency of 5 Hz (p<0.001). MS is a safe procedure and is well tolerated by patients.

Conclusion: pMS when exposed to the area of S2-S4 roots for 20 minutes 3 times a week with a course for 5 weeks is reliably effective against the clinical symptoms of OAB at different frequency modes (1 and 5 Hz). At the same time, MS with a frequency of 5 Hz may have an advantage over stimulation of 1 Hz in terms of its effect on urodynamic parameters (maximum cystometric capacity, peak and average urine flow velocity and residual urine volume), which may be associated with a large inhibitory effect on detrusor.

[骶磁刺激治疗膀胱过度活动综合征:频率为 1 赫兹和 5 赫兹的方案比较分析]。
外周磁刺激(pMS)在治疗下尿路症状(如膀胱过度活动症(OAB)症状)方面已显示出其有效性。会阴区域(骨盆底)和骶骨根部区域(骶骨根部 S3 投射)被用作刺激部位。已发表的文献介绍了具有不同刺激参数的方案,虽然每种方案都可靠地证明了临床疗效,但在分析现有资料来源时,尚未发现有比较研究可选择优先刺激模式:比较不同频率(1 赫兹和 5 赫兹)的骶管 MS 模式对有 OAB 症状患者的疗效和安全性:这是一项单盲前瞻性随机比较临床研究,共纳入 59 名有 OAB 症状的患者。这些患者被简单随机分为第1组(30人)和第2组(29人),前者每周3次、每次骶根区(S2-S4)的刺激频率为1赫兹,持续5周;后者的刺激频率为5赫兹,其余参数和疗程与第1组相同:结果:不同频率模式(1 赫兹和 5 赫兹)的骶管刺激对 OAB 临床症状同样有效,组间无明显差异证实了这一点。在接受频率为 5 赫兹的 MS 的患者中,最大膀胱容量、最大和平均尿流速度的正常化以及残余尿量的减少都有更明显的提高(与第 1 组相比,pp=0.007、p=0.011 和 p=0.012)。指标差异最大的是最大膀胱容量的增加--频率为 1 赫兹的 MS 增加了 +31±25 毫升,频率为 5 赫兹的 MS 增加了 +109±96 毫升(p 结论:在不同频率模式(1 赫兹和 5 赫兹)下,将 pMS 暴露于 S2-S4 根部区域,每周 3 次,每次 20 分钟,疗程 5 周,对 OAB 的临床症状有可靠的疗效。同时,在对尿动力参数(最大膀胱容量、峰值和平均尿流速度以及残余尿量)的影响方面,频率为 5 Hz 的 MS 可能比 1 Hz 的刺激更有优势,这可能与对排尿肌的巨大抑制作用有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The journal deals with the study of the mechanism of a physiological and therapeutic effect of physical and health resort factors, methods and results of their employment, as well as with theoretical and practical problems involved in the use of exercise therapy in combined treatment of different diseases. The results of research and experience of using physical and health resort methods in medical practice and organization of physiotherapeutic and sanatorial and health resort service, book reviews on physiotherapy, health resort science and exercise therapy are published. Scientific life of allied specialities, proceedings of congresses, conferences, symposia (including foreign), the activity of republican and local societies, etc., are covered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信