Development of the Japanese version of the stroke stigma scale: a validity and reliability assessment.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-19 DOI:10.1080/10749357.2024.2318097
Shin Kitamura, Reiko Miyamoto, Shota Watanabe, Taiki Yoshida, Yoshikazu Ishii
{"title":"Development of the Japanese version of the stroke stigma scale: a validity and reliability assessment.","authors":"Shin Kitamura, Reiko Miyamoto, Shota Watanabe, Taiki Yoshida, Yoshikazu Ishii","doi":"10.1080/10749357.2024.2318097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The stigma perceived by many post-stroke persons hinders their social lives. A scale to measure stigma is needed to identify social problems related to stigma, and to evaluate effectiveness of interventions.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to develop a Japanese version of the Stroke Stigma Scale (SSS-J), and confirm its utility by examining reliability and validity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty community-dwelling post-stroke individuals were enrolled at six sites. After translating the scale into Japanese using back translation methods, psychometric properties of the rating scale, internal scale validity, and reliability were examined to fit the Rasch model. Criterion-related validity, construct validity, and test-retest reliability were examined using total scores transformed to logit. For test-retest reliability, 30 participants completed the SSS-J twice, one week apart.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Rasch analysis showed that the SSS-J had the best fit with 15 items on a 3-category rating scale. Item difficulty logits were -2.01 to 2.21, person ability logits were -4.69 to 0.62 (mean, -1.41), person reliability coefficient was 0.71 (separation index, 1.58), and item reliability coefficient was 0.96 (separation index, 5.04). For criterion validity, Spearman's rank correlation coefficient with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale was 0.51 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). For construct validity, Spearman's rank correlation coefficients with each subscale of the Stroke Impact Scale ranged from -0.36 to -0.16 (<i>p</i> = 0.002-0.126). For test-retest reliability, the intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.64 (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SSS-J adapted to the Rasch model was reliable and valid. This scale can be used to quantitatively measure stigma among community-dwelling post-stroke persons in Japan.</p>","PeriodicalId":23164,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"745-754"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2024.2318097","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The stigma perceived by many post-stroke persons hinders their social lives. A scale to measure stigma is needed to identify social problems related to stigma, and to evaluate effectiveness of interventions.

Objectives: This study aimed to develop a Japanese version of the Stroke Stigma Scale (SSS-J), and confirm its utility by examining reliability and validity.

Methods: Eighty community-dwelling post-stroke individuals were enrolled at six sites. After translating the scale into Japanese using back translation methods, psychometric properties of the rating scale, internal scale validity, and reliability were examined to fit the Rasch model. Criterion-related validity, construct validity, and test-retest reliability were examined using total scores transformed to logit. For test-retest reliability, 30 participants completed the SSS-J twice, one week apart.

Results: Rasch analysis showed that the SSS-J had the best fit with 15 items on a 3-category rating scale. Item difficulty logits were -2.01 to 2.21, person ability logits were -4.69 to 0.62 (mean, -1.41), person reliability coefficient was 0.71 (separation index, 1.58), and item reliability coefficient was 0.96 (separation index, 5.04). For criterion validity, Spearman's rank correlation coefficient with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale was 0.51 (p < 0.001). For construct validity, Spearman's rank correlation coefficients with each subscale of the Stroke Impact Scale ranged from -0.36 to -0.16 (p = 0.002-0.126). For test-retest reliability, the intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.64 (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: The SSS-J adapted to the Rasch model was reliable and valid. This scale can be used to quantitatively measure stigma among community-dwelling post-stroke persons in Japan.

卒中耻辱感量表日文版的开发:有效性和可靠性评估。
背景:许多脑卒中后患者所感受到的耻辱感阻碍了他们的社交生活。我们需要一个测量成见的量表来确定与成见相关的社会问题,并评估干预措施的有效性:本研究旨在开发日语版脑卒中病耻感量表(SSS-J),并通过考察其信度和效度确认其实用性:方法:在六个地点招募了 80 名居住在社区的脑卒中后患者。采用回译方法将量表翻译成日语后,根据 Rasch 模型对评分量表的心理测量特性、内部量表效度和信度进行了检验。标准相关效度、建构效度和重测信度则使用转换为对数的总分进行检验。为了检验重测信度,30 名参与者两次完成了 SSS-J,每次间隔一周:Rasch 分析表明,SSS-J 的最佳拟合度为 3 类评分量表上的 15 个项目。项目难度对数为-2.01至2.21,个人能力对数为-4.69至0.62(平均值为-1.41),个人信度系数为0.71(分离指数为1.58),项目信度系数为0.96(分离指数为5.04)。在标准效度方面,与流行病学研究中心抑郁量表的斯皮尔曼等级相关系数为 0.51(P = 0.002-0.126)。在测试-重测信度方面,类内相关系数为 0.64(p 结论):根据 Rasch 模型改编的 SSS-J 具有可靠性和有效性。该量表可用于定量测量日本社区卒中后患者的病耻感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation is the leading journal devoted to the study and dissemination of interdisciplinary, evidence-based, clinical information related to stroke rehabilitation. The journal’s scope covers physical medicine and rehabilitation, neurology, neurorehabilitation, neural engineering and therapeutics, neuropsychology and cognition, optimization of the rehabilitation system, robotics and biomechanics, pain management, nursing, physical therapy, cardiopulmonary fitness, mobility, occupational therapy, speech pathology and communication. There is a particular focus on stroke recovery, improving rehabilitation outcomes, quality of life, activities of daily living, motor control, family and care givers, and community issues. The journal reviews and reports clinical practices, clinical trials, state-of-the-art concepts, and new developments in stroke research and patient care. Both primary research papers, reviews of existing literature, and invited editorials, are included. Sharply-focused, single-issue topics, and the latest in clinical research, provide in-depth knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信