A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Drug Eluting Stents for Safety and Efficacy in Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
International Journal of Neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-19 DOI:10.1080/00207454.2024.2313013
Anand A Dharia, Stefano H Byer, Kevin Le, Xi Chen, Nihil Abraham, Suzanne Hunt, Michael G Abraham
{"title":"A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Drug Eluting Stents for Safety and Efficacy in Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease.","authors":"Anand A Dharia, Stefano H Byer, Kevin Le, Xi Chen, Nihil Abraham, Suzanne Hunt, Michael G Abraham","doi":"10.1080/00207454.2024.2313013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Advancements in arterial stenting technology have challenged prior notions favoring medical management for intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD). Where previous conclusions were drawn from bare metal stent (BMS) technology, recent studies suggest drug-eluting stents (DES) are favorable due to their anti-proliferative effect, which reduces vascular remodeling.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature prior to August 2023 reviewing all reports of ICAD treated with DES. Our target outcomes were incidence of any stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), or death within 30 days (postprocedural complications), ischemic stroke in the territory of the qualifying artery beyond 30 days (long-term complications), radiographically detected in-stent restenosis rate (ISR), and symptomatic ISR during follow-up. A subgroup analysis further stratified preprocedural mean stenosis above and below 70% into severe and moderate cohorts, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane and EMBASE query identified 527 candidate articles, from which 14 studies met inclusion criteria for a total of 607 patients and 640 ICAD lesions. Incidence of postprocedural complications was 7.3% (95% CI 3.9-11.7%) with subgroup analysis demonstrating significantly higher incidence in the severely stenotic group [9.0% (95% CI 4.7-14.5%)] than the moderately stenotic group [3.0% (95% CI 0.7-6.8%)]. Long-term complications were 1.2% (95% CI 0.4-2.3%). Radiographic ISR was 3.5% (95% CI 1.4-6.3%) and symptomatic ISR was 0.3% (95% CI 0.0-1.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that DES can effectively reduce the risk of ISR and may be a viable treatment modality to reduce long-term complications in refractory ICAD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":14161,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"607-617"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00207454.2024.2313013","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Advancements in arterial stenting technology have challenged prior notions favoring medical management for intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD). Where previous conclusions were drawn from bare metal stent (BMS) technology, recent studies suggest drug-eluting stents (DES) are favorable due to their anti-proliferative effect, which reduces vascular remodeling.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature prior to August 2023 reviewing all reports of ICAD treated with DES. Our target outcomes were incidence of any stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), or death within 30 days (postprocedural complications), ischemic stroke in the territory of the qualifying artery beyond 30 days (long-term complications), radiographically detected in-stent restenosis rate (ISR), and symptomatic ISR during follow-up. A subgroup analysis further stratified preprocedural mean stenosis above and below 70% into severe and moderate cohorts, respectively.

Results: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane and EMBASE query identified 527 candidate articles, from which 14 studies met inclusion criteria for a total of 607 patients and 640 ICAD lesions. Incidence of postprocedural complications was 7.3% (95% CI 3.9-11.7%) with subgroup analysis demonstrating significantly higher incidence in the severely stenotic group [9.0% (95% CI 4.7-14.5%)] than the moderately stenotic group [3.0% (95% CI 0.7-6.8%)]. Long-term complications were 1.2% (95% CI 0.4-2.3%). Radiographic ISR was 3.5% (95% CI 1.4-6.3%) and symptomatic ISR was 0.3% (95% CI 0.0-1.5%).

Conclusions: Our systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that DES can effectively reduce the risk of ISR and may be a viable treatment modality to reduce long-term complications in refractory ICAD patients.

药物洗脱支架对颅内动脉粥样硬化性疾病安全性和有效性的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:动脉支架技术的进步挑战了以往对颅内动脉粥样硬化性疾病(ICAD)采取药物治疗的观念。以前的结论来自裸金属支架(BMS)技术,而最近的研究表明,药物洗脱支架(DES)因其抗增殖作用而有利,可减少血管重塑:我们对 2023 年 8 月之前的文献进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,回顾了所有使用 DES 治疗 ICAD 的报告。我们的目标结果是任何卒中、短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)或30天内死亡的发生率(术后并发症)、30天后合格动脉区域内的缺血性卒中(长期并发症)、影像学检测到的支架内再狭窄率(ISR)以及随访期间的无症状ISR。一项亚组分析进一步将术前平均狭窄率高于70%和低于70%的患者分别划分为重度和中度组:通过PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane和EMBASE检索发现了527篇候选文章,其中14项研究符合纳入标准,共有607名患者和640个ICAD病变。术后并发症的发生率为 7.3% (95% CI 3.9-11.7%),亚组分析显示严重狭窄组[9.0% (95% CI 4.7-14.5%)]的发生率明显高于中度狭窄组[3.0% (95% CI 0.7-6.8%)]。长期并发症为 1.2%(95% CI 0.4-2.3%)。放射学ISR为3.5%(95% CI 1.4-6.3%),症状性ISR为0.3%(95% CI 0.0-1.5%):我们的系统综述和荟萃分析表明,DES能有效降低ISR风险,可能是减少难治性ICAD患者长期并发症的一种可行治疗方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
132
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Neuroscience publishes original research articles, reviews, brief scientific reports, case studies, letters to the editor and book reviews concerned with problems of the nervous system and related clinical studies, epidemiology, neuropathology, medical and surgical treatment options and outcomes, neuropsychology and other topics related to the research and care of persons with neurologic disorders.  The focus of the journal is clinical and transitional research. Topics covered include but are not limited to: ALS, ataxia, autism, brain tumors, child neurology, demyelinating diseases, epilepsy, genetics, headache, lysosomal storage disease, mitochondrial dysfunction, movement disorders, multiple sclerosis, myopathy, neurodegenerative diseases, neuromuscular disorders, neuropharmacology, neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, pain, sleep disorders, stroke, and other areas related to the neurosciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信