Comparison of luteal phase stimulation with follicular phase stimulation in poor ovarian response: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.2 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Mozhgan Vahabi Dastjerdi, Soheila Ansaripour, Mina Ataei, Roya Gharedaghi, Seyedeh Melika Mostafavi Hoseini, Arash Mohazzab, Simin Zafardoust
{"title":"Comparison of luteal phase stimulation with follicular phase stimulation in poor ovarian response: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Mozhgan Vahabi Dastjerdi, Soheila Ansaripour, Mina Ataei, Roya Gharedaghi, Seyedeh Melika Mostafavi Hoseini, Arash Mohazzab, Simin Zafardoust","doi":"10.1186/s40834-024-00265-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the last decade, luteal-phase ovarian stimulation (LPOS) has been suggested as an alternative controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) protocol for in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles mainly in women with a history of poor ovarian response (POR). The present randomized controlled trial study aimed to compare the outcomes of follicular phase ovarian stimulation (FPOS) and LPOS protocols in POR cases undergoing ICSI cycles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-eight POR patients who met the Bologna criteria and underwent an ICSI cycle were included. In this study, 39 POR cases were allocated to the FPOS group, and 39 POR cases were allocated to the LPOS group. The primary outcome was the number of metaphase II (MII) oocytes. In addition, the total number of oocytes, number of top-quality day 3 embryo, day 3 embryo development rate, chemical pregnancy and clinical pregnancy rates were defined as secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The obtained results demonstrated that the number of MII oocytes significantly increased in the LPOS group compared to the FPOS group (P = 0.007). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the number of GV and MI oocytes, number of top-quality day 3 embryos and day 3 embryo development rate among both categories of patients. Also, the number of total and MII oocytes was significantly higher in the LPOS group (P = 0.016).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results suggest that LPOS protocol effectively increases the number of mature oocytes in women with a history of POR.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>IRCT20210405050852N1 (Registered at Iranian registry of clinical trials; available at https://en.irct.ir/trial/55402 ).</p>","PeriodicalId":93956,"journal":{"name":"Contraception and reproductive medicine","volume":"9 1","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10874545/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception and reproductive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40834-024-00265-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the last decade, luteal-phase ovarian stimulation (LPOS) has been suggested as an alternative controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) protocol for in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles mainly in women with a history of poor ovarian response (POR). The present randomized controlled trial study aimed to compare the outcomes of follicular phase ovarian stimulation (FPOS) and LPOS protocols in POR cases undergoing ICSI cycles.

Methods: Seventy-eight POR patients who met the Bologna criteria and underwent an ICSI cycle were included. In this study, 39 POR cases were allocated to the FPOS group, and 39 POR cases were allocated to the LPOS group. The primary outcome was the number of metaphase II (MII) oocytes. In addition, the total number of oocytes, number of top-quality day 3 embryo, day 3 embryo development rate, chemical pregnancy and clinical pregnancy rates were defined as secondary outcomes.

Results: The obtained results demonstrated that the number of MII oocytes significantly increased in the LPOS group compared to the FPOS group (P = 0.007). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the number of GV and MI oocytes, number of top-quality day 3 embryos and day 3 embryo development rate among both categories of patients. Also, the number of total and MII oocytes was significantly higher in the LPOS group (P = 0.016).

Conclusion: These results suggest that LPOS protocol effectively increases the number of mature oocytes in women with a history of POR.

Trial registration: IRCT20210405050852N1 (Registered at Iranian registry of clinical trials; available at https://en.irct.ir/trial/55402 ).

黄体期刺激与卵泡期刺激对卵巢不良反应的比较:单盲随机对照试验。
背景:近十年来,黄体期卵巢刺激(LPOS)被认为是体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子显微注射(IVF/ICSI)周期的一种替代性控制卵巢刺激(COS)方案,主要用于卵巢反应不良(POR)的妇女。本随机对照试验研究旨在比较卵泡期卵巢刺激(FPOS)和LPOS方案对接受ICSI周期的POR病例的治疗效果:研究纳入了78例符合博洛尼亚标准并接受了ICSI周期的POR患者。在这项研究中,39 例 POR 病例被分配到 FPOS 组,39 例 POR 病例被分配到 LPOS 组。主要结果是分裂期 II(MII)卵母细胞的数量。此外,卵母细胞总数、第 3 天优质胚胎数、第 3 天胚胎发育率、化学妊娠率和临床妊娠率被定义为次要结果:结果表明,与 FPOS 组相比,LPOS 组的 MII 卵母细胞数明显增加(P = 0.007)。然而,两组患者的 GV 和 MI 卵母细胞数、第 3 天优质胚胎数和第 3 天胚胎发育率无明显差异。此外,LPOS 组的总卵母细胞数和 MII 卵母细胞数明显高于 LPOS 组(P = 0.016):这些结果表明,LPOS 方案能有效增加有 POR 病史的妇女的成熟卵母细胞数量:IRCT20210405050852N1(已在伊朗临床试验登记处登记;可在 https://en.irct.ir/trial/55402 上查阅)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信