First evidence of pleistocene hominin occupations in the Jovin-Joghatai plain, Northeast of the Iranian Plateau

IF 0.6 4区 地球科学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY
Azita Mirzaye , Ali Sadraei
{"title":"First evidence of pleistocene hominin occupations in the Jovin-Joghatai plain, Northeast of the Iranian Plateau","authors":"Azita Mirzaye ,&nbsp;Ali Sadraei","doi":"10.1016/j.anthro.2024.103231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As an intermediate region between the Central Iranian Plateau and Central Asia, the northeast of Iran was at the heart of Pleistocene populations’ movements between both regions. The Paleolithic survey conducted in the Jovin-Joghatai plain permitted to identify six sites. In this paper, these newfound sites are introduced and the raw material sources used at them are analyzed through petrographic tests before putting their surface assemblages into the context of the Paleolithic eastern Iran. The paper results in the identification of two sites characterized by the so-called pebble-tools. Notwithstanding some slight differences, the assemblages seem to be closed to those from the Paleolithic sites of northeast Iran, such as Abarvan in Kashafrud and Mushan Tepeh in Neyshabur as well as Kuldara in Tajikistan. On the other hand, they display disparities with the lithic industries of western Turkmenistan, Yangadja site as well as Dagh Jazireh in eastern Iran. The remaining four sites are attributable to the Middle Paleolithic on account of their affinities with centers in Central Asia such as Teshik-Tash in Uzbekistan, and Jahan Abad, Damghani, and Kalat-eShur in eastern Iran as well as the Mirak complex in the central plateau. Yet, no significant correlations seem to exist between the Middle Paleolithic industries of the Jovin-Joghatai plain and those of Kiaram and Khunik caves in eastern Iran.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46860,"journal":{"name":"Anthropologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropologie","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003552124000013","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As an intermediate region between the Central Iranian Plateau and Central Asia, the northeast of Iran was at the heart of Pleistocene populations’ movements between both regions. The Paleolithic survey conducted in the Jovin-Joghatai plain permitted to identify six sites. In this paper, these newfound sites are introduced and the raw material sources used at them are analyzed through petrographic tests before putting their surface assemblages into the context of the Paleolithic eastern Iran. The paper results in the identification of two sites characterized by the so-called pebble-tools. Notwithstanding some slight differences, the assemblages seem to be closed to those from the Paleolithic sites of northeast Iran, such as Abarvan in Kashafrud and Mushan Tepeh in Neyshabur as well as Kuldara in Tajikistan. On the other hand, they display disparities with the lithic industries of western Turkmenistan, Yangadja site as well as Dagh Jazireh in eastern Iran. The remaining four sites are attributable to the Middle Paleolithic on account of their affinities with centers in Central Asia such as Teshik-Tash in Uzbekistan, and Jahan Abad, Damghani, and Kalat-eShur in eastern Iran as well as the Mirak complex in the central plateau. Yet, no significant correlations seem to exist between the Middle Paleolithic industries of the Jovin-Joghatai plain and those of Kiaram and Khunik caves in eastern Iran.

伊朗高原东北部乔温-乔格哈泰平原上新世人类活动的首个证据
作为伊朗中部高原和中亚之间的中间地区,伊朗东北部是更新世人口在这两个地区之间流动的中心。在乔温-乔格哈泰平原进行的旧石器时代调查发现了六个遗址。本文介绍了这些新发现的遗址,并通过岩石学测试分析了这些遗址使用的原材料来源,然后将这些遗址的地表组合放到旧石器时代伊朗东部的背景下进行研究。本文最终确定了两个以所谓的卵石工具为特征的遗址。尽管存在一些细微差别,但它们的组合似乎与伊朗东北部旧石器时代遗址的组合接近,如卡萨夫鲁德的阿巴万、内沙布尔的穆山特佩以及塔吉克斯坦的库尔达拉。另一方面,这些遗址与土库曼斯坦西部、扬加贾遗址和伊朗东部的达赫贾齐雷的石器工业存在差异。其余四个遗址可归于旧石器时代中期,因为它们与中亚的中心地带(如乌兹别克斯坦的 Teshik-Tash、伊朗东部的 Jahan Abad、Damghani 和 Kalat-eShur 以及中部高原的 Mirak 建筑群)有亲缘关系。然而,若温-若格哈台平原的旧石器时代中期工业与伊朗东部基阿拉姆和胡尼克洞穴的旧石器时代中期工业之间似乎并不存在明显的关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anthropologie
Anthropologie ANTHROPOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: First published in 1890, Anthropologie remains one of the most important journals devoted to prehistoric sciences and paleoanthropology. It regularly publishes thematic issues, originalsarticles and book reviews.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信