Post-cardiac arrest temporal evolution of left ventricular function in a rat model. Speckle tracking Echocardiography and cardiac circulating biomarkers
D. De Giorgio, D. Olivari, F. Fumagalli, D. Novelli, María Cerrato, Francesca Motta, G. Ristagno, Roberto Latini, L. Staszewsky
{"title":"Post-cardiac arrest temporal evolution of left ventricular function in a rat model. Speckle tracking Echocardiography and cardiac circulating biomarkers","authors":"D. De Giorgio, D. Olivari, F. Fumagalli, D. Novelli, María Cerrato, Francesca Motta, G. Ristagno, Roberto Latini, L. Staszewsky","doi":"10.1093/ehjimp/qyae006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n There is little information from experimental studies regarding the evolution of post-resuscitation cardiac arrest (post-ROSC) myocardial dysfunction during mid-term follow-up. For this purpose, we assessed left ventricular (LV) function and circulating cardiac biomarkers at different time points in a rat model of cardiac arrest (CA).\n \n \n \n Rats were divided into two groups: control and post-ROSC rats. Eight min of untreated ventricular fibrillation were followed by 8 min of CPR. Conventional and speckle tracking (STE) echocardiographic parameters and cardiac circulating biomarkers concentrations were assessed, at 3-4-72-96h post-ROSC.\n \n \n \n At 3-and-4h post-ROSC LV systolic function resulted severely impaired and hs-cTnT and NT-pro ANP plasma concentrations were significantly increased, compared to control rats (p<0.0001 for all). At 72 and 96h post-ROSC left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) normalized. At 96h, the following variables were significantly different from control rats: early-trans-mitral-peak-velocity, 56.8 ± 3.1 vs. 87.8 ± 3.8 cm/sec, p<0.0001; late-trans-mitral-peak-velocity, 50.6±4.7 vs. 73.7±4.2 cm/sec, p<0.0001; mean s’ wave velocity, 4.6±0.3 vs. 5.9±0.3 cm/sec, p<0.0001, global longitudinal strain (GLS) -7.5±0.5 and vs. -11±1.2%, p<0.01, global longitudinal strain rate (GLSR): -0-9±0.4 and -2.3±0.2 1/sec, p<0.01 and NT-proANP concentration, 2.5[0.2; 6.0] vs 0.4 [0.01; 1.0] nmol/L, p<0.01.\n \n \n \n s’ velocity, GLS and GLSR, indicated that LV systolic function was still impaired 96h post-ROSC. These findings agree with NT-proANP concentrations which continue high. Normalization of LVEF supports the use of STE for its greater sensitivity for monitoring post-CA cardiac function. Further investigations are needed to provide evidence of the post-ROSC LV diastolic function pattern.\n","PeriodicalId":508944,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Imaging Methods and Practice","volume":"54 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Imaging Methods and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjimp/qyae006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
There is little information from experimental studies regarding the evolution of post-resuscitation cardiac arrest (post-ROSC) myocardial dysfunction during mid-term follow-up. For this purpose, we assessed left ventricular (LV) function and circulating cardiac biomarkers at different time points in a rat model of cardiac arrest (CA).
Rats were divided into two groups: control and post-ROSC rats. Eight min of untreated ventricular fibrillation were followed by 8 min of CPR. Conventional and speckle tracking (STE) echocardiographic parameters and cardiac circulating biomarkers concentrations were assessed, at 3-4-72-96h post-ROSC.
At 3-and-4h post-ROSC LV systolic function resulted severely impaired and hs-cTnT and NT-pro ANP plasma concentrations were significantly increased, compared to control rats (p<0.0001 for all). At 72 and 96h post-ROSC left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) normalized. At 96h, the following variables were significantly different from control rats: early-trans-mitral-peak-velocity, 56.8 ± 3.1 vs. 87.8 ± 3.8 cm/sec, p<0.0001; late-trans-mitral-peak-velocity, 50.6±4.7 vs. 73.7±4.2 cm/sec, p<0.0001; mean s’ wave velocity, 4.6±0.3 vs. 5.9±0.3 cm/sec, p<0.0001, global longitudinal strain (GLS) -7.5±0.5 and vs. -11±1.2%, p<0.01, global longitudinal strain rate (GLSR): -0-9±0.4 and -2.3±0.2 1/sec, p<0.01 and NT-proANP concentration, 2.5[0.2; 6.0] vs 0.4 [0.01; 1.0] nmol/L, p<0.01.
s’ velocity, GLS and GLSR, indicated that LV systolic function was still impaired 96h post-ROSC. These findings agree with NT-proANP concentrations which continue high. Normalization of LVEF supports the use of STE for its greater sensitivity for monitoring post-CA cardiac function. Further investigations are needed to provide evidence of the post-ROSC LV diastolic function pattern.