Bioequivalence of a New Pediatric Paracetamol Oral Suspension Compared With a Marketed Formulation in Healthy Adults: A Randomized, Open-Label Study

IF 1.6 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Jiri Grim MD, PhD , Marianna Armogida MD , Preeti Kachroo BAMS, MD(AM) , Kamran Siddiqui MBBS, MBA , Mauro Cavinato PhD , Mako Araga MS
{"title":"Bioequivalence of a New Pediatric Paracetamol Oral Suspension Compared With a Marketed Formulation in Healthy Adults: A Randomized, Open-Label Study","authors":"Jiri Grim MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Marianna Armogida MD ,&nbsp;Preeti Kachroo BAMS, MD(AM) ,&nbsp;Kamran Siddiqui MBBS, MBA ,&nbsp;Mauro Cavinato PhD ,&nbsp;Mako Araga MS","doi":"10.1016/j.curtheres.2024.100734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>A new oral paracetamol formulation with the same paracetamol quantity (24 mg/mL) as a marketed formulation but with finer active ingredient particle size and lower amounts of maltitol (5.85 g/dose in the test formulation vs 7.25 g/dose in the reference formulation) and sorbitol (2.4 g/dose vs 2.83 g/dose) was developed.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Establish the bioequivalence of the new pediatric formulation (test treatment) compared with the marketed formulation (reference treatment).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This Phase I, open-label trial assigned healthy adult volunteers to a single 42-mL (1 g para-cetamol) dose of test or reference treatment. Participants received both treatments in a randomized order separated by a 72-hour washout period. The primary endpoints were AUC<sub>0–tlast</sub> (AUC vs time curve from time 0 to last measurable sampling timepoint), C<sub>max</sub>, and t<sub>max</sub>. Safety assessments included adverse event, clinical laboratory, and physical examination data.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Thirty-five participants were randomized and treated. The study population was 42.9% women (57.1% men) with a median age of 30 years; most participants were non-Hispanic White. Mean C<sub>max</sub> values were comparable between test and reference products, with a median t<sub>max</sub> of 1.00 hour for both. The test/reference ratios (%) (90% CI) for AUC<sub>0–tlast</sub> and C<sub>max</sub> were 98.69% (96.46, 100.97) and 100.73% (95.63, 106.10), respectively. There were no adverse events or deaths.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The new paracetamol formulation is bioequivalent to the marketed formulation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10920,"journal":{"name":"Current Therapeutic Research-clinical and Experimental","volume":"100 ","pages":"Article 100734"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0011393X24000043/pdfft?md5=47ca70cb77c917b984528fd3d13b1234&pid=1-s2.0-S0011393X24000043-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Therapeutic Research-clinical and Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0011393X24000043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

A new oral paracetamol formulation with the same paracetamol quantity (24 mg/mL) as a marketed formulation but with finer active ingredient particle size and lower amounts of maltitol (5.85 g/dose in the test formulation vs 7.25 g/dose in the reference formulation) and sorbitol (2.4 g/dose vs 2.83 g/dose) was developed.

Objective

Establish the bioequivalence of the new pediatric formulation (test treatment) compared with the marketed formulation (reference treatment).

Methods

This Phase I, open-label trial assigned healthy adult volunteers to a single 42-mL (1 g para-cetamol) dose of test or reference treatment. Participants received both treatments in a randomized order separated by a 72-hour washout period. The primary endpoints were AUC0–tlast (AUC vs time curve from time 0 to last measurable sampling timepoint), Cmax, and tmax. Safety assessments included adverse event, clinical laboratory, and physical examination data.

Results

Thirty-five participants were randomized and treated. The study population was 42.9% women (57.1% men) with a median age of 30 years; most participants were non-Hispanic White. Mean Cmax values were comparable between test and reference products, with a median tmax of 1.00 hour for both. The test/reference ratios (%) (90% CI) for AUC0–tlast and Cmax were 98.69% (96.46, 100.97) and 100.73% (95.63, 106.10), respectively. There were no adverse events or deaths.

Conclusions

The new paracetamol formulation is bioequivalent to the marketed formulation.

Abstract Image

新型儿用扑热息痛口服混悬液与市售制剂在健康成人中的生物等效性比较:一项随机、开放标签研究
背景开发了一种新的扑热息痛口服制剂,其扑热息痛含量(24 毫克/毫升)与市售制剂相同,但活性成分粒径更细,麦芽糖醇(试验制剂为 5.85 克/剂量,参比制剂为 7.25 克/剂量)和山梨醇(2.4 克/剂量,参比制剂为 2.83 克/剂量)的含量更低。方法这项 I 期开放标签试验将健康成年志愿者分配到单次 42 毫升(1 克对位西他莫)剂量的试验或参比制剂中。受试者按随机顺序接受两种治疗,中间有72小时的冲洗期。主要终点是AUC0-tlast(从时间0到最后一个可测量的采样时间点的AUC与时间曲线)、Cmax和tmax。安全性评估包括不良事件、临床实验室和体检数据。研究人群中 42.9% 为女性(57.1% 为男性),中位年龄为 30 岁;大多数参与者为非西班牙裔白人。试验品和参比品的平均 Cmax 值相当,两者的中位 tmax 值均为 1.00 小时。AUC0-tlast和Cmax的试验/参比比率(%)(90% CI)分别为98.69%(96.46, 100.97)和100.73%(95.63, 106.10)。结论扑热息痛新制剂与上市制剂具有生物等效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: We also encourage the submission of manuscripts presenting preclinical and very preliminary research that may stimulate further investigation of potentially relevant findings, as well as in-depth review articles on specific therapies or disease states, and applied health delivery or pharmacoeconomics. CTR encourages and supports the submission of manuscripts describing: • Interventions designed to understand or improve human health, disease treatment or disease prevention; • Studies that focus on problems that are uncommon in resource-rich countries; • Research that is "under-published" because of limited access to monetary resources such as English language support and Open Access fees (CTR offers deeply discounted English language editing); • Republication of articles previously published in non-English journals (eg, evidence-based guidelines) which could be useful if translated into English; • Preclinical and clinical product development studies that are not pursued for further investigation based upon early phase results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信