Vaccination during pregnancy by race/ethnicity: a focus on American Indians/Alaska Natives

Christen L. Jarshaw MD , Osariemen Omoregie MBBS, MPH , Jennifer D. Peck PhD , Stephanie Pierce MD, MS , Emily J. Jones PhD, RNC-OB , Pardis Hosseinzadeh MD , LaTasha B. Craig MD
{"title":"Vaccination during pregnancy by race/ethnicity: a focus on American Indians/Alaska Natives","authors":"Christen L. Jarshaw MD ,&nbsp;Osariemen Omoregie MBBS, MPH ,&nbsp;Jennifer D. Peck PhD ,&nbsp;Stephanie Pierce MD, MS ,&nbsp;Emily J. Jones PhD, RNC-OB ,&nbsp;Pardis Hosseinzadeh MD ,&nbsp;LaTasha B. Craig MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>BACKGROUND</h3><p>Vaccination during pregnancy reduces the incidence of infections and their associated adverse outcomes in both mothers and infants. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has recommended influenza and Tdap vaccination during pregnancy since 2004 and 2013, respectively. Several studies have examined disparities in vaccination rates during pregnancy by race/ethnicity. However, none have included American Indians/Alaska Natives as a specific racial/ethnic group on a national level. Current literature suggests that American Indian/Alaska Native infants experience increased morbidity and mortality from both influenza and pertussis infections compared with most other groups in the United States.</p></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><p>This study aimed to evaluate the uptake of influenza and Tdap vaccinations during pregnancy by race/ethnicity, with a specific focus on American Indian/Alaska Native people.</p></div><div><h3>STUDY DESIGN</h3><p>This cross-sectional study used data from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System. Comparisons of vaccine uptake across racial/ethnic groups (American Indian/Alaska Native, Asian, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, and “None of the above”) were evaluated using weighted logistic regression analyses to estimate prevalence odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Models were adjusted for maternal age, parity, maternal education, marital status, payment method at delivery, prenatal care in first trimester, maternal smoking status, Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) participation, and receipt of influenza vaccine reported by a health care provider.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><p>For both vaccines, Asian respondents had the highest uptake (influenza, 70.1%; Tdap, 68.2%), whereas Black respondents reported the lowest uptake (influenza, 44.4%; Tdap, 57.9%). For the influenza vaccine, American Indian/Alaska Native respondents demonstrated a higher uptake compared with White respondents, and the magnitude of difference increased markedly after adjusting for respondent characteristics (adjusted odds ratio, 1.74; 95% confidence interval, 1.58–1.90). In the unadjusted analyses, Black individuals reported influenza vaccination at approximately half the rate of their White counterparts during pregnancy. This effect was attenuated but remained lower after adjustment for respondent characteristics (adjusted odds ratio, 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.70–0.76). For the Tdap vaccine, American Indian/Alaska Native respondents reported lower uptake than White respondents; however, this difference disappeared when adjusted for respondent characteristics (adjusted odds ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.83–1.19). Asian and Hispanic respondents displayed a similar uptake compared with their White counterparts for both vaccines.</p></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><p>Our findings indicate that there are racial/ethnic disparities in influenza and Tdap vaccination rates among pregnant individuals in the United States. Demonstration of increased uptake among American Indian/Alaska Native people in the crude analysis may reflect the success of various public health interventions through Tribal and Indian Health Service hospitals. Nonetheless, vaccination status during pregnancy remains seriously below national guideline recommendations. Greater measures must be taken to support preventative care in marginalized populations, with particular emphasis on community-driven solutions rooted in justice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72141,"journal":{"name":"AJOG global reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666577824000121/pdfft?md5=f63232621911af00ca0ffc31aaf5875f&pid=1-s2.0-S2666577824000121-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOG global reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666577824000121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Vaccination during pregnancy reduces the incidence of infections and their associated adverse outcomes in both mothers and infants. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has recommended influenza and Tdap vaccination during pregnancy since 2004 and 2013, respectively. Several studies have examined disparities in vaccination rates during pregnancy by race/ethnicity. However, none have included American Indians/Alaska Natives as a specific racial/ethnic group on a national level. Current literature suggests that American Indian/Alaska Native infants experience increased morbidity and mortality from both influenza and pertussis infections compared with most other groups in the United States.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the uptake of influenza and Tdap vaccinations during pregnancy by race/ethnicity, with a specific focus on American Indian/Alaska Native people.

STUDY DESIGN

This cross-sectional study used data from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System. Comparisons of vaccine uptake across racial/ethnic groups (American Indian/Alaska Native, Asian, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic White, Hispanic, and “None of the above”) were evaluated using weighted logistic regression analyses to estimate prevalence odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Models were adjusted for maternal age, parity, maternal education, marital status, payment method at delivery, prenatal care in first trimester, maternal smoking status, Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) participation, and receipt of influenza vaccine reported by a health care provider.

RESULTS

For both vaccines, Asian respondents had the highest uptake (influenza, 70.1%; Tdap, 68.2%), whereas Black respondents reported the lowest uptake (influenza, 44.4%; Tdap, 57.9%). For the influenza vaccine, American Indian/Alaska Native respondents demonstrated a higher uptake compared with White respondents, and the magnitude of difference increased markedly after adjusting for respondent characteristics (adjusted odds ratio, 1.74; 95% confidence interval, 1.58–1.90). In the unadjusted analyses, Black individuals reported influenza vaccination at approximately half the rate of their White counterparts during pregnancy. This effect was attenuated but remained lower after adjustment for respondent characteristics (adjusted odds ratio, 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.70–0.76). For the Tdap vaccine, American Indian/Alaska Native respondents reported lower uptake than White respondents; however, this difference disappeared when adjusted for respondent characteristics (adjusted odds ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.83–1.19). Asian and Hispanic respondents displayed a similar uptake compared with their White counterparts for both vaccines.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that there are racial/ethnic disparities in influenza and Tdap vaccination rates among pregnant individuals in the United States. Demonstration of increased uptake among American Indian/Alaska Native people in the crude analysis may reflect the success of various public health interventions through Tribal and Indian Health Service hospitals. Nonetheless, vaccination status during pregnancy remains seriously below national guideline recommendations. Greater measures must be taken to support preventative care in marginalized populations, with particular emphasis on community-driven solutions rooted in justice.

按种族/族裔分列的孕期疫苗接种情况:关注美国印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民
背景孕期接种疫苗可降低母婴感染率及其相关不良后果。美国妇产科医师学会分别从 2004 年和 2013 年开始推荐在孕期接种流感疫苗和百白破疫苗。有几项研究按种族/族裔调查了孕期疫苗接种率的差异。但是,没有一项研究将美国印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民作为一个特定的种族/民族群体纳入全国范围。目前的文献表明,与美国的大多数其他群体相比,美国印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民的婴儿因流感和百日咳感染而导致的发病率和死亡率均有所上升。使用加权逻辑回归分析评估了不同种族/族裔群体(美国印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民、亚裔、非西班牙裔黑人、非西班牙裔白人、西班牙裔和 "非上述人群")的疫苗接种率,并估算了流行几率比和 95% 的置信区间。模型根据产妇年龄、奇偶数、产妇教育程度、婚姻状况、分娩时的付款方式、前三个月的产前护理、产妇吸烟状况、参加妇女、婴儿和儿童特别补充营养计划(WIC)的情况以及医疗保健提供者报告的接种流感疫苗情况进行了调整。结果对于两种疫苗,亚裔受访者的接种率最高(流感,70.1%;百白破,68.2%),而黑人受访者的接种率最低(流感,44.4%;百白破,57.9%)。就流感疫苗而言,美国印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民受访者的接种率高于白人受访者,在调整受访者特征后,差异幅度明显增大(调整后的几率比为 1.74;95% 置信区间为 1.58-1.90)。在未经调整的分析中,黑人报告的孕期流感疫苗接种率约为白人的一半。在对受访者特征进行调整后,这一影响有所减弱,但仍然较低(调整后的几率比为 0.73;95% 置信区间为 0.70-0.76)。就百白破疫苗而言,美国印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民受访者的接种率低于白人受访者;然而,在对受访者特征进行调整后,这一差异消失了(调整后的几率为 0.99;95% 置信区间为 0.83-1.19)。我们的研究结果表明,美国孕妇的流感疫苗和百白破疫苗接种率存在种族/民族差异。在粗略分析中,美国印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民的接种率有所提高,这可能反映了通过部落和印第安人健康服务医院采取的各种公共卫生干预措施取得了成功。尽管如此,怀孕期间的疫苗接种情况仍然严重低于国家指导建议。必须采取更多措施来支持边缘化人群的预防保健工作,尤其要重视由社区推动的、植根于正义的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AJOG global reports
AJOG global reports Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Perinatology, Pediatrics and Child Health, Urology
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信