Eğitim Yönetiminde Etkili Metodik Değerlendirme Süreçlerinin İncelenmesi

Halil Bektaş
{"title":"Eğitim Yönetiminde Etkili Metodik Değerlendirme Süreçlerinin İncelenmesi","authors":"Halil Bektaş","doi":"10.52096/usbd.8.33.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Methodically making a negative assessment of the effectiveness and efficiency of a policy or program immediately, rather than over a broader period of time, may lead to the termination of the program. When evaluating an institution in educational management, the content of the evaluation, it and the values involved in the event will affect the final evaluation as a whole. In this context, one of the decisions that should be taken before making any policy evaluation is to determine who should make the evaluation. The specific circumstances surrounding the necessity for any evaluation will have a significant impact on the alternative that will be selected. Within this framework, the suitability of time, financing situation, subject matter expertise, understanding of evaluation findings and management support, etc. the concepts of internal evaluation and external evaluation stand out in terms of the functioning of processes. Internal assessments have other advantages, such as low cost. In addition, internal evaluators are more predisposed to the organization itself, the evaluated program and related policies, corporate stakeholders and the target audience. The biggest disadvantage of internal evaluation is its real and perceived biases. There is real prejudice. Because it is human nature for corporate members to perceive program errors through the lens of their common corporate experience. External evaluations also have a number of advantages in terms of minimizing biases, at least internal biases. The most important advantage of external evaluation is that evaluators are perceived as impartial because they have no interest in the evaluation results. The plus advantage of using external evaluators is that they are not part of the corporate culture, program and evaluated policy, and their professionalism, previous experience, training, values and perceptions offer them a completely different perspective on problem identification and potential improvements. An important disadvantage of using external evaluators is that it is more expensive than internal evaluation and more time is needed. External evaluations take more time. Because evaluators need to internalize the programs or institutions as well as the policies, programs and institutions they evaluate. Key Words: Educational Management, Educational Effectiveness, Methodical Evaluation","PeriodicalId":506660,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Social Sciences","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52096/usbd.8.33.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Methodically making a negative assessment of the effectiveness and efficiency of a policy or program immediately, rather than over a broader period of time, may lead to the termination of the program. When evaluating an institution in educational management, the content of the evaluation, it and the values involved in the event will affect the final evaluation as a whole. In this context, one of the decisions that should be taken before making any policy evaluation is to determine who should make the evaluation. The specific circumstances surrounding the necessity for any evaluation will have a significant impact on the alternative that will be selected. Within this framework, the suitability of time, financing situation, subject matter expertise, understanding of evaluation findings and management support, etc. the concepts of internal evaluation and external evaluation stand out in terms of the functioning of processes. Internal assessments have other advantages, such as low cost. In addition, internal evaluators are more predisposed to the organization itself, the evaluated program and related policies, corporate stakeholders and the target audience. The biggest disadvantage of internal evaluation is its real and perceived biases. There is real prejudice. Because it is human nature for corporate members to perceive program errors through the lens of their common corporate experience. External evaluations also have a number of advantages in terms of minimizing biases, at least internal biases. The most important advantage of external evaluation is that evaluators are perceived as impartial because they have no interest in the evaluation results. The plus advantage of using external evaluators is that they are not part of the corporate culture, program and evaluated policy, and their professionalism, previous experience, training, values and perceptions offer them a completely different perspective on problem identification and potential improvements. An important disadvantage of using external evaluators is that it is more expensive than internal evaluation and more time is needed. External evaluations take more time. Because evaluators need to internalize the programs or institutions as well as the policies, programs and institutions they evaluate. Key Words: Educational Management, Educational Effectiveness, Methodical Evaluation
调查教育管理中有效的方法评价过程
有条不紊地对一项政策或计划的有效性和效率立即做出负面评估,而不是在更长的时间内做出评估,可能会导致计划的终止。在对教育管理机构进行评价时,评价的内容、它和事件所涉及的价值观都会影响到最终的整体评价。在这种情况下,在进行任何政策评价之前,应做出的决定之一就是确定由谁来进行评价。是否有必要进行评估的具体情况将对所选择的备选方案产生重大影响。在这一框架内,考虑到时间、资金状况、主题专长、对评估结果的理解和管理支持等方 面的适宜性,内部评估和外部评估的概念在程序的运作方面显得尤为突出。内部评估还有其他优势,如成本低。此外,内部评估人员更倾向于组织本身、被评估项目和相关政策、企业利益相关者和目标受众。内部评估的最大缺点是其实际存在的和被认为存在的偏见。确实存在偏见。因为企业成员会从他们共同的企业经验的角度来看待计划的错误,这是人之常情。外部评估在减少偏见,至少是内部偏见方面也有许多优点。外部评估最重要的优点是,评估者被认为是公正的,因为他们与评估结果没有利害关系。使用外部评估人员的另一个优点是,他们不属于企业文化、计划和评估政策的一部分, 他们的专业精神、以往的经验、培训、价值观和观念为他们提供了一个完全不同的视角来 发现问题和潜在的改进措施。使用外部评估人员的一个重要缺点是,费用比内部评估高,而且需要更多的时间。外部评估需要更多的时间。因为评估人员需要将项目或机构以及他们评估的政策、项目和机构内部化。关键字教育管理、教育效果、方法评估
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信