Comparison of the Antibacterial Effect of AH26, Adseal and Beta RCS Root Canal Sealers Against Enterococcus Faecalis, an in Vitro Study

Q3 Dentistry
Sholeh Ghabraei, Hadi Assadian, Hassan Razmi, Mohammad Saeid Sheikhrezaei, S. Khedmat, Nazanin Chitsaz, Zahra Mohammadi, F Noori
{"title":"Comparison of the Antibacterial Effect of AH26, Adseal and Beta RCS Root Canal Sealers Against Enterococcus Faecalis, an in Vitro Study","authors":"Sholeh Ghabraei, Hadi Assadian, Hassan Razmi, Mohammad Saeid Sheikhrezaei, S. Khedmat, Nazanin Chitsaz, Zahra Mohammadi, F Noori","doi":"10.18502/fid.v21i5.14853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Antibacterial activity against endodontic pathogens is a desirable feature for root canal sealers. The objective of this study was to compare the antibacterial effect of three resin-based endodontic sealers (AH26, Adseal, and Beta RCS) against Enterococcus faecalis in vitro. \nMaterials and Methods: The antibacterial properties of the sealers were assessed against E. faecalis using agar diffusion test (ADT) for fresh state (N=10) and direct contact test (DCT) for freshly-mixed and set states of the materials (N=10). In ADT, the diameter of the zones of inhibition was measured after 24h of contact. In DCT, the colony-forming units of the bacteria were counted after 30 minutes and 180 minutes of exposure. The results were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and independent sample t-test. P<0.05 was considered significant. \nResults: Regarding DCT results, all test materials indicated an antibacterial effect, both in freshly-mixed and set states. The highest antibacterial effect was related to Adseal, whereas the lowest was observed in Beta RCS. There was a significant difference between all study groups (different sealers, setting states, and contact times; P<0.001), except for freshly-mixed AH26 and Adseal at 180 minutes (P>0.05). According to ADT, AH26 and Adseal represented the widest and the smallest inhibition zones, respectively (P<0.001). \nConclusion: Within the limitations of this in vitro study, AH26, Adseal, and Beta RCS showed antibacterial effects against E. faecalis in both freshly-mixed and set states. The antibacterial effect increased over time in all of the studied sealers.","PeriodicalId":12445,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Dentistry","volume":"28 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/fid.v21i5.14853","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Antibacterial activity against endodontic pathogens is a desirable feature for root canal sealers. The objective of this study was to compare the antibacterial effect of three resin-based endodontic sealers (AH26, Adseal, and Beta RCS) against Enterococcus faecalis in vitro. Materials and Methods: The antibacterial properties of the sealers were assessed against E. faecalis using agar diffusion test (ADT) for fresh state (N=10) and direct contact test (DCT) for freshly-mixed and set states of the materials (N=10). In ADT, the diameter of the zones of inhibition was measured after 24h of contact. In DCT, the colony-forming units of the bacteria were counted after 30 minutes and 180 minutes of exposure. The results were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and independent sample t-test. P<0.05 was considered significant. Results: Regarding DCT results, all test materials indicated an antibacterial effect, both in freshly-mixed and set states. The highest antibacterial effect was related to Adseal, whereas the lowest was observed in Beta RCS. There was a significant difference between all study groups (different sealers, setting states, and contact times; P<0.001), except for freshly-mixed AH26 and Adseal at 180 minutes (P>0.05). According to ADT, AH26 and Adseal represented the widest and the smallest inhibition zones, respectively (P<0.001). Conclusion: Within the limitations of this in vitro study, AH26, Adseal, and Beta RCS showed antibacterial effects against E. faecalis in both freshly-mixed and set states. The antibacterial effect increased over time in all of the studied sealers.
体外研究:比较 AH26、Adseal 和 Beta RCS 根管封闭剂对粪肠球菌的抗菌效果
目的:对根管病原体的抗菌活性是根管封闭剂的一个理想特性。本研究的目的是比较三种树脂根管封闭剂(AH26、Adseal 和 Beta RCS)在体外对粪肠球菌的抗菌效果。材料和方法:采用琼脂扩散试验(ADT)对新鲜状态的材料(10 人)以及直接接触试验(DCT)对新鲜混合和固化状态的材料(10 人)进行了评估。在 ADT 试验中,在接触 24 小时后测量抑制区的直径。在 DCT 中,分别在接触 30 分钟和 180 分钟后对细菌的菌落形成单位进行计数。结果采用双向方差分析和独立样本 t 检验进行分析。P0.05).根据 ADT,AH26 和 Adseal 分别代表了最宽和最小的抑菌区(P<0.001)。结论在这项体外研究的局限性范围内,AH26、Adseal 和 Beta RCS 在新混合和凝固状态下都显示出对粪肠球菌的抗菌效果。所有研究的封闭剂的抗菌效果都会随着时间的推移而增强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Dentistry
Frontiers in Dentistry Dentistry-General Dentistry
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信