Automated office infrastructures and the valuation of work

Lizzie Richardson
{"title":"Automated office infrastructures and the valuation of work","authors":"Lizzie Richardson","doi":"10.1177/02637758231218799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Popular and academic analyses of automation in work predominantly focus on paid labour, sometimes forecasting how many jobs may be lost or investigating how new types of jobs are being created through such technological change. This article takes a different approach by considering what automation implies for the valuation of work. The starting point is that contemporary office automation is not exclusively aimed at working activities themselves but rather is increasingly directed at the infrastructure that allows work. Two infrastructural elements are identified where office automation is occurring: “tenant experience applications” that aid in the flexible occupation of office buildings, and “productivity tools” that support the organisation of office tasks regardless of location. This shift from automation targeting what work is done to how that work is done raises the question of work valuation. Plural regimes of valuation are at play in contemporary office automation, through which a myriad of interested actors emerge, extending beyond the employer and the worker. The value of flexibility thus occurs not singularly nor even primarily in the production process, but rather is achieved in the financial valuation of various aspects of office performance as well as in the social (re)definition of work.","PeriodicalId":504516,"journal":{"name":"Environment and Planning D: Society and Space","volume":"350 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment and Planning D: Society and Space","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02637758231218799","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Popular and academic analyses of automation in work predominantly focus on paid labour, sometimes forecasting how many jobs may be lost or investigating how new types of jobs are being created through such technological change. This article takes a different approach by considering what automation implies for the valuation of work. The starting point is that contemporary office automation is not exclusively aimed at working activities themselves but rather is increasingly directed at the infrastructure that allows work. Two infrastructural elements are identified where office automation is occurring: “tenant experience applications” that aid in the flexible occupation of office buildings, and “productivity tools” that support the organisation of office tasks regardless of location. This shift from automation targeting what work is done to how that work is done raises the question of work valuation. Plural regimes of valuation are at play in contemporary office automation, through which a myriad of interested actors emerge, extending beyond the employer and the worker. The value of flexibility thus occurs not singularly nor even primarily in the production process, but rather is achieved in the financial valuation of various aspects of office performance as well as in the social (re)definition of work.
自动化办公基础设施和工作估值
大众和学术界对工作自动化的分析主要集中在有偿劳动方面,有时会预测可能会失去多少工作,或研究如何通过这种技术变革创造新的工作类型。本文采用不同的方法,探讨自动化对工作估值的影响。本文的出发点是,当代办公自动化并不完全针对工作活动本身,而是越来越多地针对实现工作的基础设施。在实现办公自动化的过程中,我们发现了两个基础设施要素:帮助灵活占用办公楼的 "租户体验应用",以及支持在任何地点组织办公任务的 "生产力工具"。自动化的目标从 "完成什么工作 "转向 "如何完成工作",这就提出了 "工作估值 "的问题。在当代办公自动化的过程中,出现了多元的价值评估体系,通过这些体系,出现了无数利益相关者,而不仅仅是雇主和工人。因此,灵活性的价值并不是单一的,甚至主要不是在生产过程中产生的,而是通过对办公室绩效的各个方面进行财务估值以及对工作进行社会(重新)定义来实现的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信