James Varani , Matthew J. Bendelow, William J. Hillegas
{"title":"The effect of substrate on the production of infectious virus by cells in culture","authors":"James Varani , Matthew J. Bendelow, William J. Hillegas","doi":"10.1016/0092-1157(88)90021-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Herpes simplex virus type I (HSV-1), infectious bovine rhinotracheitis virus (IBR) and turkey herpesvirus were examined for growth in cells cultured on three different substrates. The substrates were glass, DEAE-dextran and collagen gel. With two of the viruses, HSV-1 and IBR, there were no apparent differences in production as a function of substrate. In contrast, the amount of the turkey herpesvirus which was recovered varied greatly with the substrate. Titers were highest on glass, followed by DEAE-dextran and then collagen gel. Our previous studies have indicated that the substrate on which anchorage-dependent cells are grown <em>in vitro</em> has an affect on a number of biological and biochemical properties. The present study indicates that the production of commercially important biologicals can be affected by the substrate.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":75991,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biological standardization","volume":"16 4","pages":"Pages 333-338"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0092-1157(88)90021-2","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biological standardization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0092115788900212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Herpes simplex virus type I (HSV-1), infectious bovine rhinotracheitis virus (IBR) and turkey herpesvirus were examined for growth in cells cultured on three different substrates. The substrates were glass, DEAE-dextran and collagen gel. With two of the viruses, HSV-1 and IBR, there were no apparent differences in production as a function of substrate. In contrast, the amount of the turkey herpesvirus which was recovered varied greatly with the substrate. Titers were highest on glass, followed by DEAE-dextran and then collagen gel. Our previous studies have indicated that the substrate on which anchorage-dependent cells are grown in vitro has an affect on a number of biological and biochemical properties. The present study indicates that the production of commercially important biologicals can be affected by the substrate.