A COMPARISON BETWEEN OLD & NEW TAX REGIME OF INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 FOR SALARIED INDIVIDUALS

Dr. Meghali Bora
{"title":"A COMPARISON BETWEEN OLD & NEW TAX REGIME OF INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 FOR SALARIED INDIVIDUALS","authors":"Dr. Meghali Bora","doi":"10.36713/epra15730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper provides a comprehensive comparison between the old and new tax regimes under the Income Tax Act, 1961, with a specific focus on salaried individuals. The study aims to analyse the factors influencing the choice of tax regime, assess the implications of the chosen regime on tax liability, financial planning and savings of salaried individuals. The analysis begins with an overview of the recent changes in the tax landscape, particularly those introduced in the 2023 Budget. The paper explores the governments efforts to incentivize the transition to the new tax regime while retaining the flexibility for individuals to choose between the old and new systems. Key modifications, such as increased tax rebate limit, adjusted tax slabs and adjustments in surcharge rates are highlighted to make the new regime more appealing. A thorough comparison of the pros and cons of both tax regimes is presented, covering aspects such as tax slabs, standard deductions, deductions and exemptions, HRA, other allowances and the impact on savings and investments. The paper concludes with a detailed comparison table summarizing the differences between the old and new tax regimes. \nKEY WORDS: Income Tax Act, 1961, Old tax regime, New tax regime, Salaried individuals, Budget 2023","PeriodicalId":398391,"journal":{"name":"EPRA International Journal of Economics, Business and Management Studies","volume":"30 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EPRA International Journal of Economics, Business and Management Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36713/epra15730","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper provides a comprehensive comparison between the old and new tax regimes under the Income Tax Act, 1961, with a specific focus on salaried individuals. The study aims to analyse the factors influencing the choice of tax regime, assess the implications of the chosen regime on tax liability, financial planning and savings of salaried individuals. The analysis begins with an overview of the recent changes in the tax landscape, particularly those introduced in the 2023 Budget. The paper explores the governments efforts to incentivize the transition to the new tax regime while retaining the flexibility for individuals to choose between the old and new systems. Key modifications, such as increased tax rebate limit, adjusted tax slabs and adjustments in surcharge rates are highlighted to make the new regime more appealing. A thorough comparison of the pros and cons of both tax regimes is presented, covering aspects such as tax slabs, standard deductions, deductions and exemptions, HRA, other allowances and the impact on savings and investments. The paper concludes with a detailed comparison table summarizing the differences between the old and new tax regimes. KEY WORDS: Income Tax Act, 1961, Old tax regime, New tax regime, Salaried individuals, Budget 2023
新旧《1961 年所得税法》中受薪个人税制的比较
本文对 1961 年《所得税法》规定的新旧税制进行了全面比较,并特别关注受薪人士。研究旨在分析影响税制选择的因素,评估所选择的税制对受薪人士的纳税义务、财务规划和储蓄的影响。分析首先概述了近期税制的变化,尤其是 2023 年预算中引入的变化。本文探讨了政府在鼓励向新税制过渡的同时,为个人保留在新旧税制之间进行选择的灵活性所做的努力。本文强调了一些关键的修改,如提高退税限额、调整税率和附加税率,以使新税制更具吸引力。本文对两种税制的优缺点进行了全面比较,涉及税率上限、标准扣除额、扣除额和免税额、居所津贴、其他免税额以及对储蓄和投资的影响等方面。最后,本文还提供了一份详细的对比表,总结了新旧税制之间的差异。关键词:《1961 年所得税法》、旧税制、新税制、工薪个人、2023 年预算案
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书