Influence of fibre orientation parallel to impact direction on the impact response of unidirectional glass/epoxy composite: Experimental investigation on confinement and hybridisation

IF 2.1 Q2 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
B. Ramagiri, C. S. Yerramalli, Nabodyuti Das
{"title":"Influence of fibre orientation parallel to impact direction on the impact response of unidirectional glass/epoxy composite: Experimental investigation on confinement and hybridisation","authors":"B. Ramagiri, C. S. Yerramalli, Nabodyuti Das","doi":"10.1177/20414196241232676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a high-velocity impact phenomenon, the damage is localised, and for thick composite laminates, most of the projectile’s kinetic energy is absorbed through out-of-plane compression and shear mechanisms. In conventional composite laminate, as the fibre orientations are in the in-plane of laminate, the out-of-plane compression and out-of-plane shear of laminate are utilised. In composites, the out-of-plane compressive strength is significantly lower than the in-plane (fibre direction) strength. The present study investigates the impact response of unidirectional (UD) glass/epoxy composite targets with fibres oriented parallel to the impact direction. The lack of research on the impact behaviour of unidirectional glass/epoxy composites with fibre orientation parallel to the impact direction demands further experimentation and understanding of failure mechanisms. In this study, firstly, the impact response of UD glass/epoxy composites with fibres oriented parallel to the impact direction (GFID) was investigated and compared with conventional cross-ply (GFCP) and quasi-isotropic (GFQI) glass/epoxy laminates. Secondly, to address the issues of GFID splitting on impact, GFID was confined in both the hoop and normal-to-binder directions. Thirdly, the impact response of various hybrid GFID with and without confinement with GFCP as backing was evaluated. GFID under out-of-plane punch load fails by splitting, and its compressive participation depends on the impact velocity. GFID under the hoop and normal-to-binder direction confinement showed better specific impact energy absorption relative to pure GFID. The experimental results show that GFID wounds with carbon fibre used as a facing with GFCP as a backing provide better impact resistance at HVI conditions than conventional laminates of the same thickness. These findings suggest that the combination of GFID and GFCP targets can be used to have better impact resistance in various applications.","PeriodicalId":46272,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Protective Structures","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Protective Structures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20414196241232676","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a high-velocity impact phenomenon, the damage is localised, and for thick composite laminates, most of the projectile’s kinetic energy is absorbed through out-of-plane compression and shear mechanisms. In conventional composite laminate, as the fibre orientations are in the in-plane of laminate, the out-of-plane compression and out-of-plane shear of laminate are utilised. In composites, the out-of-plane compressive strength is significantly lower than the in-plane (fibre direction) strength. The present study investigates the impact response of unidirectional (UD) glass/epoxy composite targets with fibres oriented parallel to the impact direction. The lack of research on the impact behaviour of unidirectional glass/epoxy composites with fibre orientation parallel to the impact direction demands further experimentation and understanding of failure mechanisms. In this study, firstly, the impact response of UD glass/epoxy composites with fibres oriented parallel to the impact direction (GFID) was investigated and compared with conventional cross-ply (GFCP) and quasi-isotropic (GFQI) glass/epoxy laminates. Secondly, to address the issues of GFID splitting on impact, GFID was confined in both the hoop and normal-to-binder directions. Thirdly, the impact response of various hybrid GFID with and without confinement with GFCP as backing was evaluated. GFID under out-of-plane punch load fails by splitting, and its compressive participation depends on the impact velocity. GFID under the hoop and normal-to-binder direction confinement showed better specific impact energy absorption relative to pure GFID. The experimental results show that GFID wounds with carbon fibre used as a facing with GFCP as a backing provide better impact resistance at HVI conditions than conventional laminates of the same thickness. These findings suggest that the combination of GFID and GFCP targets can be used to have better impact resistance in various applications.
平行于冲击方向的纤维取向对单向玻璃/环氧复合材料冲击响应的影响:关于约束和杂化的实验研究
在高速撞击现象中,破坏是局部的,对于厚复合材料层压板来说,弹丸的大部分动能是通过平面外压缩和剪切机制吸收的。在传统的复合材料层压板中,由于纤维的取向在层压板的平面内,因此可以利用层压板的平面外压缩和平面外剪切。在复合材料中,面外压缩强度明显低于面内(纤维方向)强度。本研究调查了纤维方向平行于冲击方向的单向(UD)玻璃/环氧复合材料靶材的冲击响应。由于缺乏对纤维取向平行于冲击方向的单向玻璃/环氧复合材料冲击行为的研究,因此需要进一步的实验和对失效机理的了解。在本研究中,首先研究了纤维取向平行于冲击方向的单向玻璃/环氧复合材料(GFID)的冲击响应,并与传统的交叉层(GFCP)和准各向同性(GFQI)玻璃/环氧层压板进行了比较。其次,为了解决 GFID 在冲击时分裂的问题,GFID 被限制在箍向和法向粘结剂方向。第三,评估了以 GFCP 作为衬底的各种有限制和无限制混合 GFID 的冲击响应。在平面外冲压荷载作用下,GFID 通过分裂失效,其压缩参与取决于冲击速度。与纯 GFID 相比,在箍筋和法向粘结剂方向限制下的 GFID 表现出更好的冲击能量吸收能力。实验结果表明,在 HVI 条件下,以碳纤维为面、GFCP 为底的 GFID 伤口比相同厚度的传统层压板具有更好的抗冲击性。这些研究结果表明,GFID 和 GFCP 目标的组合可在各种应用中获得更好的抗冲击性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
25.00%
发文量
48
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信