Intravenous Catheter Use for Inferior Lacrimal Canalicular Laceration Reconstruction: A Life Hack in Low Resource Setting

ISNA KUSUMA NINTYASTUTI, Ni Nyoman Geriputri
{"title":"Intravenous Catheter Use for Inferior Lacrimal Canalicular Laceration Reconstruction: A Life Hack in Low Resource Setting","authors":"ISNA KUSUMA NINTYASTUTI, Ni Nyoman Geriputri","doi":"10.35749/38dvfc62","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction : Silicone tube was the standard for stenting canaliculi in lacrimal canalicular laceration. But it was not always in stock at a hospital in remote area with low resource. Use of intravenous catheter to exchange the unavailable slicone tube was a possible option. \nCase Illustration : We reported two cases of inferior canalicular laceration at NTB provincial hospital. Both cases were adult, one female and one male. First case caused by nail and second because of traffic accident. There were no globe involvement in both case. Reconstruction surgeries with monocanalicular approach were performed. Intravenous catheter was used for stenting the canaliculus. First case was using a 24G, the other was 22G. The catheters were well inserted and planned to be removed at3 month. At the day 7 follow-up, the 24G catheter was extruded spontaneously while the patient with 22G was not. Both patients did not complain of profuse tearing. \nDiscussion : The diameter and length of 24G iv catheter were 0.7mm and 19mm, while 22G were 0.9mm and 25mm. The diameters were similar with the silicone tube (0.6mm) and the lengths were long enough to pass the lower and common canaliculus which has a total 15mm long. The catheter in the first case was extruded possibly because in 24G there was only 4mm inside th lacrimal sac. A high pressure air from the nose would push the catheter backward and extruded. The 22G would have 10mm inside the sac. \nConclusion : Intravenous catheter was an alternative option for inferior canalicular laceration stenting in low resource setting.","PeriodicalId":165753,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmologica Indonesiana","volume":"55 33","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmologica Indonesiana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35749/38dvfc62","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction : Silicone tube was the standard for stenting canaliculi in lacrimal canalicular laceration. But it was not always in stock at a hospital in remote area with low resource. Use of intravenous catheter to exchange the unavailable slicone tube was a possible option. Case Illustration : We reported two cases of inferior canalicular laceration at NTB provincial hospital. Both cases were adult, one female and one male. First case caused by nail and second because of traffic accident. There were no globe involvement in both case. Reconstruction surgeries with monocanalicular approach were performed. Intravenous catheter was used for stenting the canaliculus. First case was using a 24G, the other was 22G. The catheters were well inserted and planned to be removed at3 month. At the day 7 follow-up, the 24G catheter was extruded spontaneously while the patient with 22G was not. Both patients did not complain of profuse tearing. Discussion : The diameter and length of 24G iv catheter were 0.7mm and 19mm, while 22G were 0.9mm and 25mm. The diameters were similar with the silicone tube (0.6mm) and the lengths were long enough to pass the lower and common canaliculus which has a total 15mm long. The catheter in the first case was extruded possibly because in 24G there was only 4mm inside th lacrimal sac. A high pressure air from the nose would push the catheter backward and extruded. The 22G would have 10mm inside the sac. Conclusion : Intravenous catheter was an alternative option for inferior canalicular laceration stenting in low resource setting.
静脉导管用于下泪管裂孔重建术:低资源环境下的生活小窍门
导言:硅胶管是泪道裂伤时进行泪道支架植入术的标准材料。但在资源匮乏的偏远地区医院,硅胶管并不总是有库存。使用静脉导管交换没有的硅胶管是一个可行的选择。病例说明:我们在 NTB 省医院报告了两例下咽鼓管裂伤病例。两例患者均为成人,一女一男。第一例由钉子造成,第二例因交通事故造成。两个病例都没有累及眼球。两例患者均接受了单眼裂孔重建手术。使用静脉导管为管腔安装支架。第一例使用的是 24G 导管,另一例使用的是 22G 导管。导管插入良好,计划在 3 个月后拔出。在第 7 天的随访中,24G 导管被自动挤出,而使用 22G 导管的患者则没有。两名患者均未抱怨大量撕裂。讨论:24G 导管的直径和长度分别为 0.7 毫米和 19 毫米,而 22G 导管的直径和长度分别为 0.9 毫米和 25 毫米。直径与硅胶管(0.6 毫米)相似,长度足以通过总长度为 15 毫米的下管和总管。第一个病例中的导管被挤出,可能是因为 24G 的导管在泪囊内只有 4 毫米。鼻腔内的高压空气会将导管向后推挤。而 22G 的导管在泪囊内有 10 毫米。结论:在资源匮乏的情况下,静脉导管是下腔管裂孔支架植入术的替代选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信